B L A C K P E O P L E double-posted this 10 hours ago, 3 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,422,944
Or maybe, just maybe, what if they’re smart? What if these people are so smart they can conceptualize of a brilliant reason how this is Biden’s fault and actually the other 89% is stupid. I mean, probably not. But maybe!
B L A C K P E O P L E joined in and replied with this 9 hours ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,422,956
@previous (D)
I thought Trump said we’re the world’s largest producer of oil? And Trump started this war so why did he not know we didn’t have enough oil before he did this?
> Biden drained the strategic oil reserve. > > Now we need to use that reserve, but can't fully utilize it since it's significantly drained. > > This isn't complicated.
Biden sold the oil in 2022 to combat spikes due to Russia invading Ukraine. Oil prices didn’t allow a full refill. Biden did 50B barrels in 2024. Trump only did 10B in 2025 then attacked Iran.
This was with Brent crude potentially averaging around $69 a barrel in 2025, down from $81 in 2024.
And what happened to supply and demand? I thought if there was a surplus of oil before the war in Iran, that means if you produce even more oil that would drive down the price of oil and mean that the US would profit less from the sale of oil.
…but that’s what I thought. What did Trump think? Did he think?
B L A C K P E O P L E replied with this 9 hours ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,422,970
@previous (B L A C K P E O P L E)
It’s sad you don’t appreciate real music made by a Japanese. You must hate your aryan roots. Do not be ashamed of being Indian!
> Like hold up for a second… > > I thought Donald Trump said we did that whole thing in Venezuela for their oil… but we produce more oil than Venezuela, so we don’t need their oil. > >https://www.worldometers.info/oil/oil-production-by-country/ > > And what happened to supply and demand? I thought if there was a surplus of oil before the war in Iran, that means if you produce even more oil that would drive down the price of oil and mean that the US would profit less from the sale of oil. > > > …but that’s what I thought. What did Trump think? Did he think?
I’d be fine filling the SPR with Venezuelan oil. Problem is fatass Chavez and Madumbass let the refining infrastructure decline. They were filling their tankers with Russian oil.
It did reduce drug trafficking yes, but we're going to have to stop this conversation because you are incapable of having a normal conversation and insist on using the strawman technique multiple times in every single thread.
So I'm done, please have fun shouting into the void.
B L A C K P E O P L E replied with this 7 hours ago, 42 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,423,009
I posted in this thread before you did and you replied to me. I didn’t post in this thread because I wanted a conversation with you. It really sounds like you got upset at what I said and you don’t want to have to justify the claim you made because you know you can’t do it.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 hours ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,423,010
@previous (B L A C K P E O P L E)
You strawmanned Trump.
You said he did it to control their oil, but he and the administration always said it was to combat drug trafficking.
Why does a smart person need to misrepresent the people they disagree with 100% of the time.
It takes intelligence to respond to someone elses argument, but if you lack that you can just make up a silly argument you already know how to refute.
You always feel the need to create a fake, silly argument to attack. That seems like the behavior of a very low IQ person who cannot figure out a response the actual argument.
B L A C K P E O P L E replied with this 7 hours ago, 28 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,423,011
And while you can tell me what you want me to say or what you don’t want me to say, you can’t make me do what you want me to do. I get that you’re arrogant and you want control over other people, but I’m not going to agree with you just because you want to bully me into agreeing with you. I’m not going to agree with your position on anything because you consistently have the most stupid position on every issue.
> I’m not going to agree with you just because you want to bully me into agreeing with you.
Again, a strawman. I never said you have to agree with me
I said if you're going to disagree, respond to what was actually said.
If you always have to pretend someone said something else, and you are incapable of responding to what they actually said, then you are too stupid to actually have a conversation.
B L A C K P E O P L E replied with this 7 hours ago, 45 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,423,022
@1,423,020 (D)
So wait a minute, what you’re telling me, is that you think that Donald Trump didn’t think about controlling the oil before he decided to go into Venezuela, he just happened to discover that Venezuela had oil after he sent the navy there?
B L A C K P E O P L E double-posted this 7 hours ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,423,023
Are you actually genuinely stupid? The Venezuela operation had nothing to do with drugs, it was about the oil and the drugs excuse was propaganda, that’s why you were afraid to give me a source to back up your claim that drug trafficking went down.
B L A C K P E O P L E triple-posted this 7 hours ago, 49 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,423,027
Because I’m going to tell you, if you know you’re lying to me, I’ll respect you more than if you’re a true believer, because you have to be pretty fucking stupid to not see this subject the way that it is.