Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 34 minutes later[^][v]#1,421,745
Definitely men. It’s more socially acceptable for men to be losers, so hoards of low IQ male losers idolize low IQ male losers with online followings like Nick Fuentes and Asmongold. Then on top of that, men will also simp for women.
> Definitely men. It’s more socially acceptable for men to be losers, so hoards of low IQ male losers idolize low IQ male losers with online followings like Nick Fuentes and Asmongold. Then on top of that, men will also simp for women.
Men will watch streamers but they never idolize them the way women idolize random celebrities.
A guy will get famous for a catchy song and women will obsess over him and scream when they see him.
With men there's more of a detachment. They may follow a guy's advice for their expertise or gawk over a hot woman but it's not really about the person in either case.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,421,788
Now I’m confused. I have some Fox and Friends and Tucker nuthugger family members. I also have some female relatives who are celebrity obsessed morons. You’d think they were going to Taylor Swift’s wedding. Morons.
Do they follow the personal lives and drama of the Fox hosts, or show up to events with them live to scream? Is there a name for the fanbase like "swifties" has?
Chuds are annoying, but men don't have the same parasocial connections.
> Do they follow the personal lives and drama of the Fox hosts, or show up to events with them live to scream? Is there a name for the fanbase like "swifties" has? > > Chuds are annoying, but men don't have the same parasocial connections.
Some women talk about celebrities like they’re best friends. It’s actually a good thing. You know to avoid such pea brains.