@previous (B)
I think it was all related to some underlying condition, that then later escalated to substance abuse at young age. I couldn't be bothered to read it again, that's on me, but I agree with the sentiment, early strong intervention often is cheaper than a long spiraling low intervention, such as a month of therapy instead of a year, or a month of benefits instead of a year. That's why I posted it, it feels like the state is doing a whole lot of good intentions, but often not efficient in effects. So there's lots of government employees, doing all kinds of unnecessary work, when maybe it required a therapist, a counselor and a year to work on some stuff.
Edit: yet I had to read this again for errors but in the end I figured I can't be bothered, that's on me.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
@previous (C)
> early strong intervention
Ah, like my dental insurance covering two cleanings a year now. Took them long enough to figure that one out.
@previous (D)
Exactly something like that
@1,421,200 (C)
Talk therapy isn't going to stop addiction or crime, talk therapy is when women and fags pay medical industry prices for validation.
@previous (E)
Well you would know. I suppose that's why real therapy is better