This is a good read. He starts by citing another author who speculates that feminine irrationality is rooted in a lack of memory.
This explanation fits well for many reasons, but one thing the paper doesn't mention is that this would also explain the lack of accountability that women have. Why would you accept responsibility for something when you have no memory of it.
> Total beta move, write a 12 page article instead of asking himself why he can't get his knob slobbed.
It was probably harder back then. You went out on 2-3x dates and got married. Brothels weren’t a great option because there were no antibiotics for syphilis.
I get you on the dumb rant. One of my female friends went out with a guy. She’s recently divorced and a sure thing. Instead the retard ranted about his ex wife and made his date feel unsafe. Idiot.
> Total beta move, write a 12 page article instead of asking himself why he can't get his knob slobbed.
I was just about to say that looking for over 100 year old sexist garbage to hate on women is the most homosexual thing of all time then I remembered I’m not supposed to be homophobic so I can’t say that. But I am thinking it about OP.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,420,175
It’s also the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard, my mom still remembers things from when she was a 6 year old. Women don’t lack the ability to remember things, and memory isn’t required for higher order thinking. Chimpanzees have better short term memories than humans, they basically have photographic memories. Chimpanzees actually outperform humans on some memory tasks, but nobody’s making the argument that chimpanzees are smarter than humans. Intelligence and memory and logic are three different things.
Anonymous D triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,420,176
Logic and memory actually don’t require intelligence. Inanimate objects can have both the capacity for logic and memory.
But that’s the thing with these types of people who want to categorize men and women or black people and white people as superior or inferior, they base it all off of a stupid person’s concept of what being smart means.
> Logic and memory actually don’t require intelligence. Inanimate objects can have both the capacity for logic and memory. > > But that’s the thing with these types of people who want to categorize men and women or black people and white people as superior or inferior, they base it all off of a stupid person’s concept of what being smart means.
Inanimate objects don’t have cognition and are incapable of having memory or applying logic.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 16 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,420,199
@1,420,189 (E)
It’s funny you typed that out on a computer which has memory and has logic gates. Cognition isn’t the same thing as logic or memory which was my point. Thank you.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,420,206
@1,420,175 (D)
The author of this paper doesn't run with that theory, but he talks about it in the beginning.
Someone could remember specific people in specific physical activities, and not be able to remember variables or certain abstract concepts.
Women can remember where they live and work, but have serious trouble following conversations and context. That vould be due to how locations and conversational structures are stored.