Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4 hours ago, 17 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,419,690
At Target for just under $10
Also GPS Sats could be useless over Iran, which would screw up any targets jets need.
Iran can use Russia GPS Sats just in case.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 hours ago, 5 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,419,694
@previous (C)
GLONASS isn't reliable, there's a good reason Iran couldn't stop the last strikes and Venezuela's air defenses failed during the Maduro's extraction.
Anonymous B replied with this 4 hours ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,419,695
@1,419,689 (A)
I tell you Jimbo, those kooky third world ooga-boogas might seem like the worst thing ever, but without the liberal cuck-a-ducks none of them would have ever gotten out of the stone age. Always kill a nigger before an enemy, Jimbo.
> GLONASS isn't reliable, there's a good reason Iran couldn't stop the last strikes and Venezuela's air defenses failed during the Maduro's extraction.
Venezuela’s air defenses didn’t fail, they weren’t used at all because the United States never invaded Venezuela. It was an internal coup supported by the United States.
> GLONASS isn't reliable, there's a good reason Iran couldn't stop the last strikes and Venezuela's air defenses failed during the Maduro's extraction.
AI: GLONASS is generally considered less accurate and reliable than GPS
, with civilian accuracy typically within 5–10 meters compared to GPS's 3.5–7.8 meters.
And I was in error. GPS has two outputs (in effect) The civilian GPS can be turned off with Military encrypted still working.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 hours ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,419,700
@previous (C)
Note civilian accuracy. There’s effectively no difference between 10 meters and 7.8 meters of accuracy if you’re trying to blow up a building or a ship that’s more than 10 meters across.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 hours ago, 5 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,419,701
Maduro was a liability to the socialist regime in Venezuela because he was so unpopular, so his vice president Delcy Rodríguez cooperated with the United States to allow Maduro to be kidnapped so she could assume power instead. It’s still an authoritarian dictatorship, and there was no change of government and there will not be any elections held.
Anonymous D triple-posted this 3 hours ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,419,704
And the thing with Iran right, is Trump said he destroyed their nuclear program. If you’re not stupid, you should ask why is he trying to destroy a nuclear program that shouldn’t exist if he really was successful the first time? I’m not going to answer that question, but if you’re not a complete idiot, it should be very obvious what actually happened.
> Note civilian accuracy. There’s effectively no difference between 10 meters and 7.8 meters of accuracy if you’re trying to blow up a building or a ship that’s more than 10 meters across.
Of key importance is to BOMB the Super Protected Uranium processing deeeeeeep underground and steel plate protection. Accuracy is everything!
"Iran has significantly fortified its uranium processing capabilities, particularly at the
Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) and a new, deeply buried facility near Natanz, often referred to as "Pickaxe Mountain," aimed at protecting them from potential aerial strikes. These sites are located hundreds of meters inside mountain rock, featuring complex, reinforced underground,
and heavily fortified entrances designed to withstand bunker-buster bombs"
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 hours ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,419,706
@previous (C)
There were satellite pictures that’s showed dozens of trucks lined up outside the Fordow facility before it was bombed. The government said "They were so confident it couldn’t be destroyed they didn’t remove the uranium, they put more in."
There are two possibilities. All you need to know is Trump still thinks we should destroy the Iranian nuclear program, therefore it still exists. Maybe the uranium is down there, maybe it’s not, it doesn’t really matter actually.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 hours ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,419,707
South Africa is actually closer to being able to produce nuclear weapons than Iran is. Iran is trying to build a stockpile of weapons grade uranium, so they need to build enrichment facilities. South Africa doesn’t have any enrichment facilities because they already have a stockpile.
> There were satellite pictures that’s showed dozens of trucks lined up outside the Fordow facility before it was bombed. The government said "They were so confident it couldn’t be destroyed they didn’t remove the uranium, they put more in." > > There are two possibilities. All you need to know is Trump still thinks we should destroy the Iranian nuclear program, therefore it still exists. Maybe the uranium is down there, maybe it’s not, it doesn’t really matter actually.
Iran does NOT have to make a working Atomic Bomb. They can do great damage to a place by spreading the Nuke Fuel - Even incomplete fuel will kill zillions when spread by the wind. Maybe slow cancer deaths yet totally effective.