Topic: MAGA fags were so triggered they needed a Kid Rock halftime show.
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #132,884
This way they could be sheltered from the terrifying Latino performance sung in Mexican. Turning Point provided a safe space for terrified MAGA celebrants who didn’t have to witness a Puerto Rican foreigner despoil the stage with his jungle rhythms. Kid Rock also gave them another half hour to avoid talking to their families or, God forbid, read a book.
BlindingDarkLight joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 18 minutes later[^] [v] #1,417,637
They think Canada is a part of the United States but Puerto Rico isn’t. Wait until they find out there are French speakers in Canada.
boof joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 20 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,640
Kid Rock is such a big phoney. This "Mr. Rock" as it turns out, is really an overgrown trust fund theater kid named Rob Richie. His fuckin dad had a car dealership.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,641
@previous (boof)
> Kid Rock is such a big phoney. This "Mr. Rock" as it turns out, is really an overgrown trust fund theater kid named Rob Richie. His fuckin dad had a car dealership.
One of the biggest in Michigan.
He reminds me of this hobo hippie kid in high school. The bus pulls up to his house and it was a mansion. He wasn’t camping out back.
> Kid Rock is such a big phoney. This "Mr. Rock" as it turns out, is really an overgrown trust fund theater kid named Rob Richie. His fuckin dad had a car dealership.
One of the biggest in Michigan.
He reminds me of this hobo hippie kid in high school. The bus pulls up to his house and it was a mansion. He wasn’t camping out back.
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,642
@1,417,640 (boof)
> Kid Rock is such a big phoney. This "Mr. Rock" as it turns out, is really an overgrown trust fund theater kid named Rob Richie. His fuckin dad had a car dealership.
“He was raised in a 5,660-square-foot home in Romeo, Michigan, on a 6-acre estate featuring a horse stable and orchard. His early career was supported by family money.”
> Kid Rock is such a big phoney. This "Mr. Rock" as it turns out, is really an overgrown trust fund theater kid named Rob Richie. His fuckin dad had a car dealership.
“He was raised in a 5,660-square-foot home in Romeo, Michigan, on a 6-acre estate featuring a horse stable and orchard. His early career was supported by family money.”
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 32 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,647
Donald J. Trump is the democratically elected President of Puerto Rico.
BlindingDarkLight joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,648
@previous (E)
Maybe he should respect the citizens he works for. He serves us not the other way around.
Maybe he should respect the citizens he works for. He serves us not the other way around.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,649
@previous (BlindingDarkLight)
He won the popular vote after campaigning to enforce immigration laws.
President's are supposed to serve by doing what they promised they would.
He won the popular vote after campaigning to enforce immigration laws.
President's are supposed to serve by doing what they promised they would.
BlindingDarkLight replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,653
@previous (E)
He barely won the popular vote and his approval rating has only gotten lower and lower since he took office because people think he’s doing a bad job of it.
He barely won the popular vote and his approval rating has only gotten lower and lower since he took office because people think he’s doing a bad job of it.
BlindingDarkLight double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,654
Donald Trump actually got less than 50% of the votes in 2024. He still won the popular vote, but the majority of Americans have never supported him.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,655
@previous (BlindingDarkLight)
> Donald Trump actually got less than 50% of the votes in 2024. He still won the popular vote, but the majority of Americans have never supported him.
He won the election due to people who thought a lifelong con man and seditionist, whose has excelled at entrepreneurial failure and defrauding investors, would magically become a restrained and astute statesman at 80.
> Donald Trump actually got less than 50% of the votes in 2024. He still won the popular vote, but the majority of Americans have never supported him.
He won the election due to people who thought a lifelong con man and seditionist, whose has excelled at entrepreneurial failure and defrauding investors, would magically become a restrained and astute statesman at 80.
BlindingDarkLight joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,663
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,664
I support democracy, and I’m not an expert on this, but the Ancient Greeks had some criticisms of democracy. For example, I think Aristotle took a more pessimistic view of it. Of course, these days you’re not supposed to question libertarian thinking.
Anonymous H triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,665
Trump’s main support base really is uneducated white voters. Which is why they think college is indoctrination. It’s not that college makes people left wing or college is left wing propaganda, it’s more that the smarter somebody is the more likely it is they’ll realize how stupid Trump is.
Anonymous H quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,667
Also if you look at the history of slavery and the civil rights movement, there is a valid argument to be made that a strong federal government guarantees freedom more effectively than giving individual states democratic sovereignty does. If it was up to white southern voters, slavery wouldn’t have ended.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,668
Democratic voters are all on the niggers and homos.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 59 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,669
The reason economics is called the dismal science is because it actually proved that slavery was a net negative for the economy. Which played out in the civil war, the north won because it was more developed and more industrious. People who try to white wash the civil war to pretend it wasn’t about slavery (the states that seceded wrote that it was because of slavery) will say it was over "states rights." There’s some truth in that, it was states rights to own slaves. That’s why they were called confederate, because they wanted a weak federal government. But the modern American state was the federation which was the original central government before the US split apart. Which is why republicans want to weaken the federal government despite controlling it.
Anonymous J double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,670
People will say it’s authoritarian, but sometimes you actually really do need a strong central authority to kill people that don’t want to be a part of that union in order to protect the rights of individuals. Which maybe sounds twisted but that’s how it worked out in reality.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,689
nigguhs toungue my anus
Sam joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,690
If the beloved Kamala Harris had won the election, incomes would soar and living costs would plummet. The hundred-million or more entrants would bless us with diversity and maximize the multiculturalism that makes us stronger than any other country on the planet.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,691
Anonymous E replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,694
@1,417,653 (BlindingDarkLight)
If they barely win, they still won.
Respecting democracy means letting them carry out their democratic mandate.
You can't just ignore the election results when they don't go your way.
If they barely win, they still won.
Respecting democracy means letting them carry out their democratic mandate.
You can't just ignore the election results when they don't go your way.
BlindingDarkLight replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,695
@previous (E)
How is not supporting Trump the same thing as ignoring election results? I didn’t vote for Trump.
How is not supporting Trump the same thing as ignoring election results? I didn’t vote for Trump.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,704
@previous (BlindingDarkLight)
Forget how we got started with this?
You said he should respect citizens.
I pointed out that a president respects citizens by doing what he campaigned to do.
If he stopped enforcing immigration laws like he said, then he'd be disrespecting the majority of voters. He had a mandate to deport illegal immigrants.
Forget how we got started with this?
You said he should respect citizens.
I pointed out that a president respects citizens by doing what he campaigned to do.
If he stopped enforcing immigration laws like he said, then he'd be disrespecting the majority of voters. He had a mandate to deport illegal immigrants.
BlindingDarkLight replied with this 1 month ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,708
BlindingDarkLight double-posted this 1 month ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,710
There’s no reason to throw a fit about the half time show other than racism. Puerto Ricans are American citizens and the United States didn’t have an official language until Donald Trump signed an executive order. But the reason why we didn’t have an official language is because not all American citizens speak English. 95% of people in Puerto Rico speak Spanish but it’s a part of the United States. It’s incredibly disrespectful to complain that American citizens aren’t American because he doesn’t approve of their culture, which is American.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,728
@1,417,694 (E)
> If they barely win, they still won.
>
> Respecting democracy means letting them carry out their democratic mandate.
>
> You can't just ignore the election results when they don't go your way.
They don’t have a mandate. An election win is not permission to grift, rule by royal decree, use federal police as a personal army, cause massive job losses and hurt American business and taxpayers.
Trump is a lifelong business failure who succeeds only in enriching himself.
It’s an administration of liars that denied Project 25 was their plan. Trump casually talks about seizing Greenland and sees fit to rupture alliances he never would have possessed the intelligence to create.
He is surrounded by a cadre of unqualified subordinates who have overseen health care cost increases and outbreaks of measles and tuberculosis.
He’s an autocrat whose only virtue is deeply underscoring that the rich and powerful have no accountability. The sheep obey laws while they abuse teenage girls on an island with impunity.
> If they barely win, they still won.
>
> Respecting democracy means letting them carry out their democratic mandate.
>
> You can't just ignore the election results when they don't go your way.
They don’t have a mandate. An election win is not permission to grift, rule by royal decree, use federal police as a personal army, cause massive job losses and hurt American business and taxpayers.
Trump is a lifelong business failure who succeeds only in enriching himself.
It’s an administration of liars that denied Project 25 was their plan. Trump casually talks about seizing Greenland and sees fit to rupture alliances he never would have possessed the intelligence to create.
He is surrounded by a cadre of unqualified subordinates who have overseen health care cost increases and outbreaks of measles and tuberculosis.
He’s an autocrat whose only virtue is deeply underscoring that the rich and powerful have no accountability. The sheep obey laws while they abuse teenage girls on an island with impunity.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,734
@1,417,690 (Sam)
> If the beloved Kamala Harris had won the election, incomes would soar and living costs would plummet. The hundred-million or more entrants would bless us with diversity and maximize the multiculturalism that makes us stronger than any other country on the planet.
plus we get to look at a decent looking woman all the time instead another fat minichan bozo in the office. again.
I genuinely believe most male maga/far-right voters are secretly gay.
> If the beloved Kamala Harris had won the election, incomes would soar and living costs would plummet. The hundred-million or more entrants would bless us with diversity and maximize the multiculturalism that makes us stronger than any other country on the planet.
plus we get to look at a decent looking woman all the time instead another fat minichan bozo in the office. again.
I genuinely believe most male maga/far-right voters are secretly gay.
Anonymous O double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,737
@1,417,728 (N)
> The sheep obey laws while they abuse teenage girls on an island with impunity.
exactly. when I wanna do that its considered "immoral" or whatever but when they do its okay? thats soo not fair >:(
> The sheep obey laws while they abuse teenage girls on an island with impunity.
exactly. when I wanna do that its considered "immoral" or whatever but when they do its okay? thats soo not fair >:(
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,738
@1,417,734 (O)
Trump paints his entire face an JD Vance wears eyeliner.
https://youtu.be/Fv6m7vFaHcY
Trump paints his entire face an JD Vance wears eyeliner.
https://youtu.be/Fv6m7vFaHcY
Anonymous E replied with this 1 month ago, 40 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,743
@1,417,728 (N)
> They don’t have a mandate. An election win is not permission to grift, rule by royal decree, use federal police as a personal army, cause massive job losses and hurt American business and taxpayers.
He's using federal police to deport people, which is what he campaigned on.
And yes, it's not permanent. Every 4 years the people get to decide who the next President is.
America gets 4 years of ICE because America voted for 4 years of ICE.
The losers of the election don't get to invalidate that because they are upset. The very idea is undemocratic. Maybe the "democrats" should change their name since they don't respect elections.
> They don’t have a mandate. An election win is not permission to grift, rule by royal decree, use federal police as a personal army, cause massive job losses and hurt American business and taxpayers.
He's using federal police to deport people, which is what he campaigned on.
And yes, it's not permanent. Every 4 years the people get to decide who the next President is.
America gets 4 years of ICE because America voted for 4 years of ICE.
The losers of the election don't get to invalidate that because they are upset. The very idea is undemocratic. Maybe the "democrats" should change their name since they don't respect elections.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 56 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,756
@previous (E)
> > They don’t have a mandate. An election win is not permission to grift, rule by royal decree, use federal police as a personal army, cause massive job losses and hurt American business and taxpayers.
>
> He's using federal police to deport people, which is what he campaigned on.
>
> And yes, it's not permanent. Every 4 years the people get to decide who the next President is.
>
> America gets 4 years of ICE because America voted for 4 years of ICE.
>
> The losers of the election don't get to invalidate that because they are upset. The very idea is undemocratic. Maybe the "democrats" should change their name since they don't respect elections.
I’m not a Democrat. MAGA is an autocratic movement that hijacked the GOP. No one is invalidating an election. They’re questioning the abuses of power by a corrupt old man.
ICE agents killed two people who didn’t do anything. They’re also grabbing actual citizens and lawful residents. Oddly, Obama deported far more and he did so by having states empty their prisons of illegal criminals to send home.
Securing the border is a win. Of course, Trump had his allies subvert a good bipartisan bill that would have done the same under the last administration.
Trump promised affordability. Failed. Hailed a new age of manufacturing and failed with tariffs that helped eliminate 68,000 manufacturing jobs last year. He and his cronies are destroying alliances and export markets. Then they lie more and deflect.
> > They don’t have a mandate. An election win is not permission to grift, rule by royal decree, use federal police as a personal army, cause massive job losses and hurt American business and taxpayers.
>
> He's using federal police to deport people, which is what he campaigned on.
>
> And yes, it's not permanent. Every 4 years the people get to decide who the next President is.
>
> America gets 4 years of ICE because America voted for 4 years of ICE.
>
> The losers of the election don't get to invalidate that because they are upset. The very idea is undemocratic. Maybe the "democrats" should change their name since they don't respect elections.
I’m not a Democrat. MAGA is an autocratic movement that hijacked the GOP. No one is invalidating an election. They’re questioning the abuses of power by a corrupt old man.
ICE agents killed two people who didn’t do anything. They’re also grabbing actual citizens and lawful residents. Oddly, Obama deported far more and he did so by having states empty their prisons of illegal criminals to send home.
Securing the border is a win. Of course, Trump had his allies subvert a good bipartisan bill that would have done the same under the last administration.
Trump promised affordability. Failed. Hailed a new age of manufacturing and failed with tariffs that helped eliminate 68,000 manufacturing jobs last year. He and his cronies are destroying alliances and export markets. Then they lie more and deflect.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 month ago, 44 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,767
@previous (Q)
> ICE agents killed two people who didn’t do anything.
Renee Good refused to get out her car when ordered to, and then accelerated when a federal agent was in front of her car.
You are lying about something with video evidence proving you wrong. Even if the video is too fast for you, you can go frame by frame and see the car accelerate forward before the ice agent moves. He later had internal bleeding.
Cut your losses and stop repeating the same lies.
> ICE agents killed two people who didn’t do anything.
Renee Good refused to get out her car when ordered to, and then accelerated when a federal agent was in front of her car.
You are lying about something with video evidence proving you wrong. Even if the video is too fast for you, you can go frame by frame and see the car accelerate forward before the ice agent moves. He later had internal bleeding.
Cut your losses and stop repeating the same lies.
boof replied with this 1 month ago, 20 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,775
Anonymous K replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,786
Anonymous E replied with this 1 month ago, 42 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,807
@1,417,775 (boof)
First the left lies with a pretense of civility, next they are debunked, and finally they devolve into childish behavior.
Can't lose an argument if you stop taking it seriously, right?
It's a real mystery why you can't win elections.
First the left lies with a pretense of civility, next they are debunked, and finally they devolve into childish behavior.
Can't lose an argument if you stop taking it seriously, right?
It's a real mystery why you can't win elections.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous K replied with this 1 month ago, 37 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,810
Nigguhs so triggered by losing that they spam their defective thoughts everwhere constantly.
boof replied with this 4 weeks ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,867
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,876
@1,417,767 (E)
You're fooling yourself if you think you're convincing anyone, the fact is he should have had more than internal bleeding because he murdered a mother. Almost causing a minor injury to a idiot that steps in front of a car, doesn't justify lethal force by that idiot or any other idiot for something that would have mounted to a minor car accident.
You're fooling yourself if you think you're convincing anyone, the fact is he should have had more than internal bleeding because he murdered a mother. Almost causing a minor injury to a idiot that steps in front of a car, doesn't justify lethal force by that idiot or any other idiot for something that would have mounted to a minor car accident.
Anonymous E replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,901
Anonymous E double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,902
@1,417,876 (R)
Wrong, you don't get a pass on attempted murder because you're a mother.
First because because your sex isn't a legal defense.
Second, because cheap tactics like "she was a mother" just encourage that demographic to be the front line since they have immunity. A lot like when leftists bring children to a protest.
The left hides behind women and children for a PR win when things go violent. The right makes men the front line so only the men are exposed to violence.
Wrong, you don't get a pass on attempted murder because you're a mother.
First because because your sex isn't a legal defense.
Second, because cheap tactics like "she was a mother" just encourage that demographic to be the front line since they have immunity. A lot like when leftists bring children to a protest.
The left hides behind women and children for a PR win when things go violent. The right makes men the front line so only the men are exposed to violence.
Anonymous R replied with this 4 weeks ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,904
@previous (E)
Can you read? Can you understand the difference between a car accident, fleeing the scene, resisting arrest.... And attempted murder? I don't think you can. Are all car accidents attempted murder? Am I murdering you right now?
Can you read? Can you understand the difference between a car accident, fleeing the scene, resisting arrest.... And attempted murder? I don't think you can. Are all car accidents attempted murder? Am I murdering you right now?
Anonymous E replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,905
@previous (R)
She was ordered to get out of her car, and decided to accelerate with an officer still in front if the vehicle.
If you are being detained and try to kill them while fleeing, the officer can legally kill that person.
This is not exclusive to the US. All countries work this way.
She was ordered to get out of her car, and decided to accelerate with an officer still in front if the vehicle.
If you are being detained and try to kill them while fleeing, the officer can legally kill that person.
This is not exclusive to the US. All countries work this way.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous R replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,906
@previous (E)
Ah you can't understand the difference between fleeing the scene and attempted murder. You don't even understand the difference between car accidents and attempted murder.
Ah you can't understand the difference between fleeing the scene and attempted murder. You don't even understand the difference between car accidents and attempted murder.
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,907
@previous (R)
Tbh I’ve talked to that guy before. He believes in eugenics and thinks humanoid robots will take over the world and he’s obsessed with American politics but he’s an EU citizen. I think he has some mental issue tbh.
Tbh I’ve talked to that guy before. He believes in eugenics and thinks humanoid robots will take over the world and he’s obsessed with American politics but he’s an EU citizen. I think he has some mental issue tbh.
Anonymous S double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,908
Like idk, I’ve met right wing Americans IRL, even actual real life trump supporters usually aren’t nearly as radicalized as him. It’s like a pathological thing, he’ll never change his mind no matter what you say.
Anonymous R replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,909
@previous (S)
I think they should, if nothing else, call Trump a traitor. That way they don't have to change anything about what they believe and not have to do mental gymnastics all the time just to coherently believe what they do and be a trump supporter.
I think they should, if nothing else, call Trump a traitor. That way they don't have to change anything about what they believe and not have to do mental gymnastics all the time just to coherently believe what they do and be a trump supporter.
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,910
@previous (R)
I’m still the same person as anonymous S, I just cleared my cookies. I think a lot of people in the world feel relatively powerless in their daily lives, so the whole white supremacist rhetoric that they were born special appeals to them, and then living vicariously through a rich pathological liar appeals to them. They feel power in lying because if they’re not beholden to the truth they feel like they can do whatever they want. It’s a really messed up way to live that won’t get them anywhere, but it is what it is.
I’m still the same person as anonymous S, I just cleared my cookies. I think a lot of people in the world feel relatively powerless in their daily lives, so the whole white supremacist rhetoric that they were born special appeals to them, and then living vicariously through a rich pathological liar appeals to them. They feel power in lying because if they’re not beholden to the truth they feel like they can do whatever they want. It’s a really messed up way to live that won’t get them anywhere, but it is what it is.
Anonymous T double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,911
There’s really no logic to the way that they think. For example, white supremacists want to live in completely white societies, and they feel like they’re superior because they’re white so that makes them feel special. But if everybody actually was white, being white couldn’t possibly make somebody special. But they don’t even think about simple things like that.
Anonymous R replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,912
@1,417,910 (T)
That's so sad because just being a human is already profoundly special, I suppose the world can take the wonder out of that anyways, I mean it definitely can.
That's so sad because just being a human is already profoundly special, I suppose the world can take the wonder out of that anyways, I mean it definitely can.
Anonymous T replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,913
@previous (R)
Yeah, I mean, all of us are incredibly lucky in a lot of ways. I guess if we could be randomly born as any species in any time in any place, being humans in modern industrialized societies instead of hunter gatherers or insects or something is highly unlikely.
Yeah, I mean, all of us are incredibly lucky in a lot of ways. I guess if we could be randomly born as any species in any time in any place, being humans in modern industrialized societies instead of hunter gatherers or insects or something is highly unlikely.
Anonymous T double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,914
Whatever the human to ant ratio is, it’s amazing we’re not ants.
Anonymous R replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,916
@1,417,913 (T)
Yeah it's a very lucky thing, but so mysterious for me personally. Like what is the deal with us, we can come up with lots of answers for that vague question, then watch die hard or something.
Yeah it's a very lucky thing, but so mysterious for me personally. Like what is the deal with us, we can come up with lots of answers for that vague question, then watch die hard or something.
Anonymous T replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,917
If humans have existed for 300,000 years and the Industrial Revolution was 200 years ago, that’s also very lucky.
Anonymous R replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,918
Anonymous T replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,919
@previous (R)
Either way it’s lucky, whether society continues for a long time or it doesn’t. Either we were born really early or really late.
Either way it’s lucky, whether society continues for a long time or it doesn’t. Either we were born really early or really late.
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Anonymous R replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,922
@previous (T)
Perhaps there truly won't be a satisfying answer, because maybe nothing truly justifies it.
Perhaps there truly won't be a satisfying answer, because maybe nothing truly justifies it.
Anonymous T replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,925
@previous (R)
People have different opinions on it, but there are so many stars in the universe, I wonder if we’re really the only civilization and if there are others if they could be more advanced than we are. What would it mean if a civilization was a billion years older than us?
People have different opinions on it, but there are so many stars in the universe, I wonder if we’re really the only civilization and if there are others if they could be more advanced than we are. What would it mean if a civilization was a billion years older than us?
Anonymous T double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,926
Because the sun isn’t a first generation star.
Anonymous R replied with this 4 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,927
@previous (T)
I don't know what that means but I've wondered about how a intelligent life form would spread if there's truly no way for such abnormalities to travel great distances on cosmic scale.
I like to think it wouldn't be done in the name of expansion like a empire or something like that, but mere respect of life, they'd try to send these versatile microorganisms, put those on rocks, and just spread it around like turkey on Thanksgiving
I don't know what that means but I've wondered about how a intelligent life form would spread if there's truly no way for such abnormalities to travel great distances on cosmic scale.
I like to think it wouldn't be done in the name of expansion like a empire or something like that, but mere respect of life, they'd try to send these versatile microorganisms, put those on rocks, and just spread it around like turkey on Thanksgiving
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,931
Who saw Donald Drumpf’s first term & decided to have more of that?
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 54 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,943
@1,417,907 (S)
Humanoid robots absolutely will take over the world though, it's only a matter of time. Some gooner will kickstart it by demanding clanker rights
Humanoid robots absolutely will take over the world though, it's only a matter of time. Some gooner will kickstart it by demanding clanker rights
Elon joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,956
Anonymous W double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,958
Elon triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,417,959
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,418,016
@1,417,931 (U)
> Who saw Donald Drumpf’s first term & decided to have more of that?
Deluded dupes and cultists who translate chaos into purpose and who can deny reality. The goalposts are always moving yet they will say the goalposts always were there.
> Who saw Donald Drumpf’s first term & decided to have more of that?
Deluded dupes and cultists who translate chaos into purpose and who can deny reality. The goalposts are always moving yet they will say the goalposts always were there.
Anonymous Z-1 joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 11 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,418,069
He real question is: is Donald Trump transgender?
Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,418,075
The TPUSA show used bots to increase YouTube “viewership.”
boof replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 days later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,418,794
hey I found a swell commentary on the hafltime show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WWJssZIDac
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WWJssZIDac