Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 hours ago, 15 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,415,277
i said the same thing. however some namefag always comes up with a straw man argument to derail the point towards africa or some meandering yap session of history.
oatmeal cucker and that blackest black fuck are the two that i think of when that happens.
boof joined in and replied with this 13 hours ago, 10 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,415,280
what is meant by radical left? because to me, it's beheading the aristocracy. not something innocuous as letting fags get married, or as stupid as having annoying stupid hair.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 hours ago, 31 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,415,286
@1,415,280 (boof)
Radical left is a handful of terminally online twitter folk that maga likes to pretend represents every single person who doesn't vote Republican. In other words, it doesn't exist.
> Radical left is a handful of terminally online twitter folk that maga likes to pretend represents every single person who doesn't vote Republican. In other words, it doesn't exist.
There is a strain of the authoritarian left that consists of bullies. They’re the ones who embarked on gender madness and acted like secular religious fanatics. They have never held MAGA-like power and their media and corporate friends discarded them like hot potatoes three weeks after the election.
They were the boosters for “mostly peaceful protests” in 2020 and they’re the ones who routinely tear up Portland.
They’re the types who champion the rights of aggressors or turn working class neighborhoods into open air drug markets through non-enforcement. They don’t prosecute criminals and permit public disorder. While this has been referred to as anarchy-tyranny it’s less a grand design than obscure 1980s academia meets wannabe 1960s radicals.