Topic: USA Destroyed
Sam started this discussion 1 day ago #132,488
Mainstream media is owned by the socioeconomic class that seeks to destroy Western civilization and place a hereditary mega-wealthy elite class at the head of all Western government. The start of a one-world government. Their propaganda and indoctrination systems will not warn We, the People of the dangers threatening our ways of life. Sadly, much of the USA populace is either part of the problem by assisting the tyrant elite class (look at those Minneapolis traitor protestors in action) or by ignoring the realities that will send our grandkids or their children into slavery to the New World Order.
Most to all who appear at this GAB group know the many methods used to destroy the West. European countries are falling fast and cesspools such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc are not far behind. The USA is making steady progress towards destruction as the video by Tucker Carlson shows us. The elites are so wealthy thus powerful and with so many money-hungry traitors ready to serve the elite masters that I fear that all of Western civilization is doomed; including the USA.
I envision but one way to prevent the elites from attaining their heredity-based one-world government. The militaries of all western countries must rise up and permanently imprison the elite class and their higher-level cohorts, minions and lackeys and drive out the barbarian filth that were brought into Western countries to destroy our cultures, societies and entire countries!!!
Anything less than winning a total war against our elite-class enemies results in the end of our lives as we once knew them. Heaven help the common folks of the future under the lash of a tyrannical one-world government. Modern technology will allow the hereditary elite-class and their minions to ensure their evil regime can never be defeated by the common folks.
Share the video with as many people as you can.
.
https://rumble.com/v74o7gk-tucker-on-what-the-violent-ice-protests-are-really-about-and-what-it-means-.html
Most to all who appear at this GAB group know the many methods used to destroy the West. European countries are falling fast and cesspools such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc are not far behind. The USA is making steady progress towards destruction as the video by Tucker Carlson shows us. The elites are so wealthy thus powerful and with so many money-hungry traitors ready to serve the elite masters that I fear that all of Western civilization is doomed; including the USA.
I envision but one way to prevent the elites from attaining their heredity-based one-world government. The militaries of all western countries must rise up and permanently imprison the elite class and their higher-level cohorts, minions and lackeys and drive out the barbarian filth that were brought into Western countries to destroy our cultures, societies and entire countries!!!
Anything less than winning a total war against our elite-class enemies results in the end of our lives as we once knew them. Heaven help the common folks of the future under the lash of a tyrannical one-world government. Modern technology will allow the hereditary elite-class and their minions to ensure their evil regime can never be defeated by the common folks.
Share the video with as many people as you can.
.
https://rumble.com/v74o7gk-tucker-on-what-the-violent-ice-protests-are-really-about-and-what-it-means-.html
TheDarkestDude joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,414,450
It’s interesting how people that believe in the great replacement conspiracy theory recognize that western countries are deteriorating. But they blame the deterioration on non-whites from non-western counties, but fail to notice that developing countries aren’t deteriorating, they’re actually growing much faster than the west is economically. Compare India’s GDP growth to America’s or Japan’s or Germany’s. A hundred years from now, China, India, and various countries in Africa will probably end up being more powerful than Europe, Australia, and the Americas.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 9 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,455
@previous (TheDarkestDude)
Is it really a conspiracy theory when I meet regular people in person who say whites should die out and that we can keep society going with immigration?
Is it really a conspiracy theory when I meet regular people in person who say whites should die out and that we can keep society going with immigration?
TheDarkestDude replied with this 1 day ago, 3 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,456
White people in the west are so used to being on top that they can’t comprehend this. Everyone is equal, differences in power and wealth can be explained by population sizes and birth rates. Europe used to have a bigger population than Africa, so because there were simply more Europeans they invented more things and could send more men to fight in Africa than the other way around, so Europeans colonized Africa. Africa’s population surpassed Europe in the 90s.
China developed first because of the one child policy. China used to be as poor as Africa, but they got their birth rates under control first through highly questionable means (forced abortions), but nevertheless it happened. When China’s birth rate fell, they began having 10% growth annually for a period of 30 years.
India never had a one Child policy, so India is about 30 years behind China. Their birth rates fell naturally instead of through forced government intervention. Now they’re starting to have higher rates of GDP growth, not 10% yet, around 7% so far.
The west doesn’t have a high population, Asia has a high population. Both Asia and the west have birth rates below immigration so both will shrink in the future without immigration.
Africa has the highest birth rates, but they have about four children per woman. Right now they have 1.5 billion people compared with 750 million Europeans. African birth rates are in decline, but they are so high to begin with that it is projected that Africa will to continue to grow for the rest of the century. By the time that African birth rates fall below replacement, sometime around the beginning of the next century, they’ll have about 40% of the world’s population, China will have a much smaller much older population, and so will Europe. So it isn’t unreasonable to assume that when Africa does develop, they might end up being more powerful than Europe was.
If you compare the ratio difference between Europe’s population and Africa’s population during the scramble to Africa to the ratio between the population projections for 2100, Africa will have a much greater advantage over Europe in the future than Europe did in the past.
China developed first because of the one child policy. China used to be as poor as Africa, but they got their birth rates under control first through highly questionable means (forced abortions), but nevertheless it happened. When China’s birth rate fell, they began having 10% growth annually for a period of 30 years.
India never had a one Child policy, so India is about 30 years behind China. Their birth rates fell naturally instead of through forced government intervention. Now they’re starting to have higher rates of GDP growth, not 10% yet, around 7% so far.
The west doesn’t have a high population, Asia has a high population. Both Asia and the west have birth rates below immigration so both will shrink in the future without immigration.
Africa has the highest birth rates, but they have about four children per woman. Right now they have 1.5 billion people compared with 750 million Europeans. African birth rates are in decline, but they are so high to begin with that it is projected that Africa will to continue to grow for the rest of the century. By the time that African birth rates fall below replacement, sometime around the beginning of the next century, they’ll have about 40% of the world’s population, China will have a much smaller much older population, and so will Europe. So it isn’t unreasonable to assume that when Africa does develop, they might end up being more powerful than Europe was.
If you compare the ratio difference between Europe’s population and Africa’s population during the scramble to Africa to the ratio between the population projections for 2100, Africa will have a much greater advantage over Europe in the future than Europe did in the past.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,457
@previous (TheDarkestDude)
As long as there is one country with freedom there will be hypergamy, and whites are a natural consequence of that.
Billions of Asians, plus the oxford study = white genes spreading.
As long as there is one country with freedom there will be hypergamy, and whites are a natural consequence of that.
Billions of Asians, plus the oxford study = white genes spreading.
TheDarkestDude replied with this 1 day ago, 5 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,459
@1,414,455 (C)
> Is it really a conspiracy theory when I meet regular people in person who say whites should die out and that we can keep society going with immigration?
I don’t think that whites should die out, but I have noticed countries with more white people have lower birth rates. That’s not the fault of non-whites, it’s a consequence of economics. Wealthier people have fewer children, and the project of white supremacy and European imperialism was to enrich Europe and the United States at the expense of the rest of the world. This worked in the short run, but in the long run Asia and Africa will have populations that are so much larger that they’ll be able to develop their own economies without needing the west.
Europe was not the wealthiest society for the majority of history. It is a recent phenomenon caused mostly by the discovery of the Americas in the late 1400s which coincided with 90% of the native population dying from smallpox which they didn’t have resistance to. This allowed Europeans to amass great wealth which eventually led to the Industrial Revolution occurring in Europe which gave Europeans massive technological and military superiority over Africans which only allowed Europe to colonize Africa in the late 1800s. However, after the Second World War, Europe bankrupted itself and lost their colonies in Africa in the 1960s and 1970s. Africa’s population surpassed Europe in the 90s, and now they have twice as many people.
It’s not anyone conspiring against white people. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. European dominance was never natural and the world will rebalance itself to its earlier natural state where the largest counties had the largest economies. Except this time, Africa will have a larger portion of the world population than it ever had in the past.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Divergence
> Is it really a conspiracy theory when I meet regular people in person who say whites should die out and that we can keep society going with immigration?
I don’t think that whites should die out, but I have noticed countries with more white people have lower birth rates. That’s not the fault of non-whites, it’s a consequence of economics. Wealthier people have fewer children, and the project of white supremacy and European imperialism was to enrich Europe and the United States at the expense of the rest of the world. This worked in the short run, but in the long run Asia and Africa will have populations that are so much larger that they’ll be able to develop their own economies without needing the west.
Europe was not the wealthiest society for the majority of history. It is a recent phenomenon caused mostly by the discovery of the Americas in the late 1400s which coincided with 90% of the native population dying from smallpox which they didn’t have resistance to. This allowed Europeans to amass great wealth which eventually led to the Industrial Revolution occurring in Europe which gave Europeans massive technological and military superiority over Africans which only allowed Europe to colonize Africa in the late 1800s. However, after the Second World War, Europe bankrupted itself and lost their colonies in Africa in the 1960s and 1970s. Africa’s population surpassed Europe in the 90s, and now they have twice as many people.
It’s not anyone conspiring against white people. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. European dominance was never natural and the world will rebalance itself to its earlier natural state where the largest counties had the largest economies. Except this time, Africa will have a larger portion of the world population than it ever had in the past.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Divergence
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
TheDarkestDude double-posted this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,460
@1,414,457 (C)
> As long as there is one country with freedom there will be hypergamy, and whites are a natural consequence of that.
>
> Billions of Asians, plus the oxford study = white genes spreading.
White people simply told themselves they were special so they wouldn’t feel guilty about the crimes they were committing in Africa, the Americas, and Asia. All white supremacist beliefs are lies, white people are not superior and white supremacist policies will only accelerate the decline of the west. You can’t afford to have wars if you aren’t having children, you can’t afford to not have immigration if you aren’t having children while other countries are still having children. It will only lead to your demise faster to react to it in the way white supremacists want to react to it.
> As long as there is one country with freedom there will be hypergamy, and whites are a natural consequence of that.
>
> Billions of Asians, plus the oxford study = white genes spreading.
White people simply told themselves they were special so they wouldn’t feel guilty about the crimes they were committing in Africa, the Americas, and Asia. All white supremacist beliefs are lies, white people are not superior and white supremacist policies will only accelerate the decline of the west. You can’t afford to have wars if you aren’t having children, you can’t afford to not have immigration if you aren’t having children while other countries are still having children. It will only lead to your demise faster to react to it in the way white supremacists want to react to it.
TheDarkestDude triple-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,461
@1,414,459 (TheDarkestDude)
Accidentally linked to the wrong article, meant to post the great divergence not post-classical history.
Accidentally linked to the wrong article, meant to post the great divergence not post-classical history.
TheDarkestDude quadruple-posted this 1 day ago, 11 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,462
In 1800 Europe had 200 million people and Africa had 90 million people.
In 1900 Europe had 400 million people and Africa had 140 million people.
In 2000 Europe had 700 million people and Africa had 800 million people.
In 2026, Europe has 750 million people and Africa has 1.5 billion people.
In 2100, Europe is projected to decline to 400 million people while Africa is projected to rise to 4 billion people. This will give Africa a 10x population advantage over Europe which is higher than the advantage that Europe ever had over Africa.
If you look into how long Africa had fewer people than Europe and for how short of a time Africa has had a larger population than Europe, there is no mystery as to how Europe dominated Africa. There’s no need for a biological explanation, population sizes can explain the entire thing.
In 1900 Europe had 400 million people and Africa had 140 million people.
In 2000 Europe had 700 million people and Africa had 800 million people.
In 2026, Europe has 750 million people and Africa has 1.5 billion people.
In 2100, Europe is projected to decline to 400 million people while Africa is projected to rise to 4 billion people. This will give Africa a 10x population advantage over Europe which is higher than the advantage that Europe ever had over Africa.
If you look into how long Africa had fewer people than Europe and for how short of a time Africa has had a larger population than Europe, there is no mystery as to how Europe dominated Africa. There’s no need for a biological explanation, population sizes can explain the entire thing.
TheDarkestDude quintuple-posted this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,463
Which is why a certain country with a very low birth rate has an interest in building infrastructure in a certain part of the world.
TheDarkestDude sextuple-posted this 1 day ago, 6 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,464
In 2100, the largest city in the world is going to be Lagos in Nigeria instead of Tokyo in Japan. In 1950, Lagos had less than a million people. The past success of Europe says absolutely nothing about the future conditions of the world. It’s entirely possible that Africa could dominate in the future more than Europe did in the past.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,483
The stupidity behind replacement is the idea of equivalence in human capital. Culture, education, and societal background matter. You can bring a Yoruba Nigerian or an Ethiopian to the U.S. and they will thrive and educate their kids. Bring people from Somalia or DRC and they’ll still be on welfare in 30 years, generally.
Same difference elsewhere.
The Dutch had a human capital strategy. Take in the Jews and Muslims from Spain to continue their businesses and access to trade routes. Take in mercantile Huguenots from France to bolster the economy.
Randomly absorb the third world and become the third world.
The real way to end illegal immigration would be to imprison landlords and employers. But the U.S. is more interested in outgroups to mollify and exploit, or to hate, and political debates.
Same difference elsewhere.
The Dutch had a human capital strategy. Take in the Jews and Muslims from Spain to continue their businesses and access to trade routes. Take in mercantile Huguenots from France to bolster the economy.
Randomly absorb the third world and become the third world.
The real way to end illegal immigration would be to imprison landlords and employers. But the U.S. is more interested in outgroups to mollify and exploit, or to hate, and political debates.
TheDarkestDude replied with this 1 day ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,485
@previous (D)
African Americans are mostly Nigerian. The Nigerian thing I think is evidence of the fact that Nigerians actually do have a good culture and the reason why Nigeria is poor is because of the British Empire, and the reason why black Americans are poorer than white Americans is because of America’s history of racial discrimination. I just hate that white supremacists want so desperately to say that black people are worse than white people. Because they’re obviously lying. Because think about this: why would white people need to deny black Americans rights to stop black people from being successful if black American were actually inferior? They wouldn’t. The entire thing is bullshit and I want to destroy these people.
African Americans are mostly Nigerian. The Nigerian thing I think is evidence of the fact that Nigerians actually do have a good culture and the reason why Nigeria is poor is because of the British Empire, and the reason why black Americans are poorer than white Americans is because of America’s history of racial discrimination. I just hate that white supremacists want so desperately to say that black people are worse than white people. Because they’re obviously lying. Because think about this: why would white people need to deny black Americans rights to stop black people from being successful if black American were actually inferior? They wouldn’t. The entire thing is bullshit and I want to destroy these people.
TheDarkestDude double-posted this 1 day ago, 48 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,486
And if African American culture is inferior to Nigerian culture in some way, the only explanation is the influence of western ideas.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,488
@1,414,485 (TheDarkestDude)
> African Americans are mostly Nigerian. The Nigerian thing I think is evidence of the fact that Nigerians actually do have a good culture and the reason why Nigeria is poor is because of the British Empire, and the reason why black Americans are poorer than white Americans is because of America’s history of racial discrimination. I just hate that white supremacists want so desperately to say that black people are worse than white people. Because they’re obviously lying. Because think about this: why would white people need to deny black Americans rights to stop black people from being successful if black American were actually inferior? They wouldn’t. The entire thing is bullshit and I want to destroy these people.
Nigeria is poor because it’s a typical petrostate. The Dutch Disease is real.
> African Americans are mostly Nigerian. The Nigerian thing I think is evidence of the fact that Nigerians actually do have a good culture and the reason why Nigeria is poor is because of the British Empire, and the reason why black Americans are poorer than white Americans is because of America’s history of racial discrimination. I just hate that white supremacists want so desperately to say that black people are worse than white people. Because they’re obviously lying. Because think about this: why would white people need to deny black Americans rights to stop black people from being successful if black American were actually inferior? They wouldn’t. The entire thing is bullshit and I want to destroy these people.
Nigeria is poor because it’s a typical petrostate. The Dutch Disease is real.
TheDarkestDude replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,489
Given Nigeria’s population growth, I have no doubt that Nigeria will be incredibly powerful in the future since Nigeria will probably surpass the United States in population by the time I’m middle aged in my 40s or 50s. Especially now that America is against immigration. That’s why white Americans started the whole bullshit about Nigeria being anti Christian.
TheDarkestDude double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,490
@1,414,488 (D)
That’s also a factor, but I don’t believe that they’re doomed forever just because they have oil. They have been building large oil refineries to refine their own oil instead of sending it to Europe. Obviously there will be corruption and various problems, but they’ll figure it out eventually.
That’s also a factor, but I don’t believe that they’re doomed forever just because they have oil. They have been building large oil refineries to refine their own oil instead of sending it to Europe. Obviously there will be corruption and various problems, but they’ll figure it out eventually.
TheDarkestDude joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,492
Obviously billionaires can cause all sorts of problems, but with the case of Nigeria, their new oil refinement is going to be owned by a black Nigerian billionaire instead of by foreigners. Unlike South Africa, there’s no white minority in Nigeria that can buy everything up to halt the country’s progress by taking away control from black people of their own resources and then blaming them for mismanaging what they don’t even own in the first place.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,493
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,494
raping nigguhs in front o their mums
Anonymous E replied with this 1 day ago, 7 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,495
Nigeria has problems with its neighbors of course, and Nigeria doesn’t have a great military by western standards. But they have a much higher population and a much stronger military than any of their neighbors. They’ve just never been provoked to get their act together. But over a period of several decades, that entire security situation could turn into something very different.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 day ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,507
@1,414,485 (TheDarkestDude)
African-Americans have significant British DNA, plus they have had unique selective pressures from their history of explicit legal discrimination which would weed out the weaker — both because slave owners bred stronger slaves, and because only the smarter and faster could escape and thrive while being persecuted.
A Nigerian living in Nigeria does not have that British DNA, and they are in a culture where they look just like the people in charge and can avoid serious discrimination like the American blacks population.
African-Americans have significant British DNA, plus they have had unique selective pressures from their history of explicit legal discrimination which would weed out the weaker — both because slave owners bred stronger slaves, and because only the smarter and faster could escape and thrive while being persecuted.
A Nigerian living in Nigeria does not have that British DNA, and they are in a culture where they look just like the people in charge and can avoid serious discrimination like the American blacks population.
TheDarkestDude joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 35 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,516
TheDarkestDude double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,517
It’s a stupid assumption to make that African Americans with white ancestry have British DNA when the majority of white Americans are not ethnically British in the first place. Plenty of black Americans are Irish or Italian or German.
TheDarkestDude triple-posted this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,519
Americans speak English, go around anywhere in America and ask people where they came from "England" is actually pretty rare.
TheDarkestDude quadruple-posted this 1 day ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,520
Also, not every white country in Europe that speaks English is British. There’s a country in Europe that speaks English that’s not British where 40 million Americans can trace their ancestry back to.
TheDarkestDude quintuple-posted this 1 day ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,521
The British and Irish aren’t even that closely genetically repeated to each other, the Anglo Saxons have Germanic and French influences in the English language and in their genetics, the Irish are Celtic and originated in centeral Europe in southern Germany and northern Italy. Irish doesn’t even have the same word order as English does, but the Irish speak English because the British occupied Ireland and forced people to speak English. That doesn’t mean white Americans are the descendants of British people.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 1 day ago, 18 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,525
@1,414,516 (TheDarkestDude)
No one said you were British.
I was responding to your claim that African Americans are Nigerian. They are not genetically the same, because African Americans have a significant amount of British DNA.
No one said you were British.
I was responding to your claim that African Americans are Nigerian. They are not genetically the same, because African Americans have a significant amount of British DNA.
TheDarkestDude replied with this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,527
Anonymous C replied with this 1 day ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,547
@previous (TheDarkestDude)
Great, and I didn't say YOU were British. I said African-Americans, as in the group as a whole, have significant amounts of British DNA.
You ≠ African Americans as a whole
Significant amount of British DNA ≠ Just plain "British"
Your specific DNA test does not negate the average of the group as a whole.
Great, and I didn't say YOU were British. I said African-Americans, as in the group as a whole, have significant amounts of British DNA.
You ≠ African Americans as a whole
Significant amount of British DNA ≠ Just plain "British"
Your specific DNA test does not negate the average of the group as a whole.
(Edited 35 seconds later.)