Topic: Democrats keep saying the church protest was legal because "free speech".
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 days ago #132,473
Do they really the 1st amendment gives you a right to trespass on private property and harass people?
These are the same people saying "freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences" to justify murdering Kirk.
The only consolation in all this is that if it does come to a civil war, they are so detached from reality that organizing based on common rules and language is impossible for them. The infighting, crash outs, and shifting responsibility would immediately break their ranks.
The right would have loyalty and order even from dissenters within the party.
These are the same people saying "freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences" to justify murdering Kirk.
The only consolation in all this is that if it does come to a civil war, they are so detached from reality that organizing based on common rules and language is impossible for them. The infighting, crash outs, and shifting responsibility would immediately break their ranks.
The right would have loyalty and order even from dissenters within the party.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 days ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,414,353
12 Jesus entered the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. 13 “It is written,” he said to them, “‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’[e] but you are making it ‘a den of robbers."
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 days ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,358
@previous (B)
The protests were not about people operating businesses in the church, they were protesting what the pastor did outside the church.
The protests were not about people operating businesses in the church, they were protesting what the pastor did outside the church.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 days ago, 11 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,363
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 days ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,366
@previous (B)
Only fascist and gestapo when America does it, though.
And Jesus didn't go into the temple to disrupt the service because of what the Rabbi was doing outside the church.
Only fascist and gestapo when America does it, though.
And Jesus didn't go into the temple to disrupt the service because of what the Rabbi was doing outside the church.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 days ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,370
@previous (A)
Normally I would be against interrupting a church service, but in this context, where the pastor is actually going out every day as a member of a secret police, and harassing, beating, and kidnapping innocent men, women, and children, including citizens and legal residents, and actually murdering people, then I literally don't give a fuck. Burn down the fucking church for all I care.
Normally I would be against interrupting a church service, but in this context, where the pastor is actually going out every day as a member of a secret police, and harassing, beating, and kidnapping innocent men, women, and children, including citizens and legal residents, and actually murdering people, then I literally don't give a fuck. Burn down the fucking church for all I care.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 days ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,374
@previous (B)
They are going after people here illegally, and defending themselves when people try to murder agents with their car.
It's a twisted morality where you think you're allowed to break into a country, fight the police enforcing the law, and then play the victim when you fail.
They are going after people here illegally, and defending themselves when people try to murder agents with their car.
It's a twisted morality where you think you're allowed to break into a country, fight the police enforcing the law, and then play the victim when you fail.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 days ago, 5 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,377
@previous (A)
She did not "try to murder agents with her car" you bootlicker. The entire world saw the videos from all angles. Again, they are beating and arresting citizens and people here legally, unclipping children and pregnant women. Go gaslight someone else, you bootlicking dumbshit.
She did not "try to murder agents with her car" you bootlicker. The entire world saw the videos from all angles. Again, they are beating and arresting citizens and people here legally, unclipping children and pregnant women. Go gaslight someone else, you bootlicking dumbshit.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 days ago, 2 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,382
@previous (B)
> She did not "try to murder agents with her car" you bootlicker. The entire world saw the videos from all angles.
And if you go frame by frame you can see the car move forward while the agent is still in front of the car.
Plus he had internal bleeding in that same area when he went to the hospital.
Do you think you can lie your way into winning a civil war? That you can override losing a battle by declaring it's your truth that you actually won?
> Again, they are beating and arresting citizens and people here legally, unclipping children and pregnant women.
That's what happens when you interfere with law enforcement.
> Go gaslight someone else, you bootlicking dumbshit.
Gaslighting is denying video evidence. Anyone can go frame by frame and see who's lying.
> She did not "try to murder agents with her car" you bootlicker. The entire world saw the videos from all angles.
And if you go frame by frame you can see the car move forward while the agent is still in front of the car.
Plus he had internal bleeding in that same area when he went to the hospital.
Do you think you can lie your way into winning a civil war? That you can override losing a battle by declaring it's your truth that you actually won?
> Again, they are beating and arresting citizens and people here legally, unclipping children and pregnant women.
That's what happens when you interfere with law enforcement.
> Go gaslight someone else, you bootlicking dumbshit.
Gaslighting is denying video evidence. Anyone can go frame by frame and see who's lying.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 days ago, 16 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,390
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 days ago, 5 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,394
@previous (B)
How did you think they BS'd the internal bleeding? Bribe the doctor or have his buddies hit him to make it convincing?
Anyone can download the video and go frame by frame.
How did you think they BS'd the internal bleeding? Bribe the doctor or have his buddies hit him to make it convincing?
Anyone can download the video and go frame by frame.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 days ago, 44 seconds later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,395
@previous (A)
There was no "internal bleeding" lol. I have watched it from ALL angles and he did not hit him. Again, go fuck yourself, Nazi pig.
There was no "internal bleeding" lol. I have watched it from ALL angles and he did not hit him. Again, go fuck yourself, Nazi pig.
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 days ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,398
Go fuck yourself, Nazi pig.Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 days ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,399
@1,414,395 (B)
> There was no "internal bleeding" lol.
Right, so how did they get the hospital to say there was?
I had two ideas how they could do it, is it one of those? Something else?
Not expecting you to know for sure, just wonder what your guess is.
> I have watched it from ALL angles and he did not hit him. Again, go fuck yourself, Nazi pig.
You went frame by frame? You are saying you saw him move before the car moved?
> There was no "internal bleeding" lol.
Right, so how did they get the hospital to say there was?
I had two ideas how they could do it, is it one of those? Something else?
Not expecting you to know for sure, just wonder what your guess is.
> I have watched it from ALL angles and he did not hit him. Again, go fuck yourself, Nazi pig.
You went frame by frame? You are saying you saw him move before the car moved?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 days ago, 53 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,401
@1,414,398 (B)
Regular police also do this when a white citizen parent commits a crime, they don't just leave the kid alone unsupervised.
Regular police also do this when a white citizen parent commits a crime, they don't just leave the kid alone unsupervised.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 days ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,408
forcefully impregnating male nigguhs butthoals
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 2 days ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,432
I shall prey for all Democrats. Then I shall bestow the fluids of extreme unction upon all of them.
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 2 days ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,437
@1,414,363 (B)
So why quote that bible passage then? Why not the one about ignoring the hungry, thirsty, imprisoned being like ignoring Christ?
So why quote that bible passage then? Why not the one about ignoring the hungry, thirsty, imprisoned being like ignoring Christ?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 5 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,446
The difference between OP and a jihadist terrorist is a jihadist terrorist is a psychopath who gets radicalized by Islam, OP is a psychopath who was radicalized by race realism and American politics.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 day ago, 55 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,453
@previous (F)
Political extremism and racism = Thinking trespassing and harassment are wrong and illegal
Political extremism and racism = Thinking trespassing and harassment are wrong and illegal
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 47 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,414,465
They were trespassing and doing disorderly conduct, not withholding rights.