pandering to male sexuality. Perhaps the classic example is Charlie's Angels, which wiki describes as "crime-fighting adventures of three women working at a private detective agency in Los Angeles, California". Make no mistake. It may as well have been titled Good Pussy Detectives. And yet, there were no lingering tight shots of good parts. No, these detectives were respected for their work. And luxurious hair. Really nice hair.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,412,794
Unless you watch foreign content sex is dead in American cinema. NC-17 and crybabies killed it. Not the conservative church ladies but the “evil male gaze” secular church lady feminists.
Now it’s:
1) Eros-free slow missionary that’s so brief the guys look like minute men.
2) Women slow riding with covers over their ass. And a bra on.
3) The rare female-centric sex shows like Sex/Life and Outlander that have a 3:1 ratio of cuddling and intimate post-coital discussions to actual fucking.
At the same time, who cares? I tried to rewatch a couple of 1990s erotic thrillers that proved neither erotic nor thrilling. A tube site is better and porn doesn’t feature bad saxophone work.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 month ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,412,800
@1,412,797 (C)
It's a terrible film I'll be honest, so I wouldn't bother unless you like ironically watching shit films (think The Room), but the extended sex scenes are the type only the 80/90s could produce. Definitely don't get much of that in modern cinema.
> It's a terrible film I'll be honest, so I wouldn't bother unless you like ironically watching shit films (think The Room), but the extended sex scenes are the type only the 80/90s could produce. Definitely don't get much of that in modern cinema.
Sounds about right. The trailer was kind of funny. Didn’t realize Patrick Swayze had a marginal actor brother.