Even MAGA doesn't deny he knew him, Trump is on record saying he did on multiple occasions.
The steelman is that Trump cut contact at some point.
> - Thinks Grok generating child porn on X is protected by the first amendment.
No one is saying that.
> - Doesn’t understand why local preschools won’t let him see the children when he shows up with a camera wearing a mask.
The steelman here is that they interviewed people in the area who confirmed they worked there for years and didn't ever see kids in the area.
And no is claiming a random journalist has a right access, they are pointing out that each time he went they had no forms to fill out, no lobby, no parents coming or going at any of them.
Finally, the Police do get access, and when they went in there were no kids, no first aid kits, no evidence of kids being there prior like leftover items or children's food, and sometimes no furniture.
When they go into a barebones daycare that's obviously not being used, and find witnesses that confirm the misspelled daycare never has kids around, there's fraud.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,412,203
I will address your points though:
1. I’ve made some mistakes in my life, I’ve never accidentally gotten on a billionaire’s private jet and landed on a pedo island where over a thousand women and children were sex trafficked multiple times over a period of several years only to "cut ties" without ever alerting any authorities. That’s one freak accident!
2. Elon Musk is. He called the UK fascist for suggesting placing a ban on X if he refuses to remove the child porn. (Shouldn’t need to explain that one.)
3. You’re one of those people who doesn’t see the problem with walking up to your local daycare and asking to see the children.
Anonymous E triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,412,204
The problem with might makes right thinking is that if one assumes that if someone has the power to do something that makes it morally justified, then pedophilia and rape can be easily justified if the person doing it is rich enough. Which is what’s going on.
> The problem with might makes right thinking is that if one assumes that if someone has the power to do something that makes it morally justified, then pedophilia and rape can be easily justified if the person doing it is rich enough. Which is what’s going on.
The grand irony being the entire Q and associated mantra of The Storm, with Trump removing elite pedos from power. Meanwhile he was an Epstein friend, Pat Bondi won’t release all the records, and Acosta negotiated Epstein’s sweetheart deal.
Meanwhile two guys who pissed on school grounds late at night while drunk and a 19 year old who accidentally slept with a lying 16 year old get lifelong sex offender raps.
I wouldn’t hold my breath for any kind of great awakening in America. Americans are the type of people so brainless that they’ll believe the world is run by billionaire pedophiles, vote for a billionaire, and then wonder why people were ever stupid enough to try socialism.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,412,294
@previous (D)
Dudes walking up to daycares asking to see the children is some pedo shit only a white man could get away with in this country. Nobody else anywhere in the world would think this is normal.
> You are more upset with someone exposing fraud than the fraudsters themselves.
A better way to phrase that is I don’t believe obvious propaganda artificially boosted on X, because I don’t use X, because I’m not a pedophile protecting Trump cultist with a room temperature IQ in Celsius.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,412,390
@1,412,295 (I)
I saw it on YouTube, and he says in his videos that he's a YouTuber.
Each place he goes, it clear the business isn't real.
They are shutting down, the government is admitting it's fraud.
Do you understand that it's only people online thinking it's real still? The people behind the businesses are already dealing with police and courts, the politicians have admitted it happened. Their spin is that people are responding to real fraud with racism, but they aren't denying the fraud.
It's not better or worse, it has nothing to do with the evidence that there's $100m+ fraud.
You don't say anything about the fraud, and you're fixated on the platform he published it on, and yet you don't even get that right.
It's more impressive he didn't have a big paper or broadcaster behind him. Why didn't they get this story earlier, or why didn't the state ever investigate to see if there were any kids at the daycares or cars at the transportation companies?