Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,412,067
@1,412,063 (Male2Male)
Trans activists will insist that puberty blockers are reversible, but you cannot go through puberty the same after you are done growing- adolescence is a critical period.
An AMAB that takes puberty blockers for years in adolescence, and then changes his mind, getting normal testosterone as an adult will not be the same.
Stopping the blockers won't return to normal, because testosterone increases height during that critical period but not as an adult (this is why AFAB trans men are not as tall).
A boy that is on puberty blockers and the. stops them later will never be a fully developed man in the physical sense.
It's not just height! Heart size, brain structure, bone density and more are all *permanently* affected if testosterone is blocked during critical development and only resumed later.
Boys can only develop into men if puberty is allowed to proceed normally. Trans activists are causing permanent harm to those children. California and other states allow this as early as 12, during the very start of that critical period!
NigguhCreme joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,412,068
Like when i donkey punch nigguhs while im raping them, they tighten their nigguhoals like a cigarcutter and then i really start GOOSH GOOSH GOOSH GOOSH
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,412,162
The mantra of “socially constructed” began with feminist professors in the 1980s and 1990s, and was part of the whole post-modernist, post-structuralist gobbledygook where nothing has meaning - unless those who state this nonsense specify otherwise. It’s the left wing portion of Newspeak.
boof joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 58 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,412,165
the philosophy of science will tell us that the very conceptualization of something as a social construct is itself not particularly interesting as the process of recognizing, categorizing, and naming anything is an endeavoar of the mind regardless
Male2Male joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,412,213
@1,412,162 (E)
Not to be "that guy" but while we can debate if race is socially constructed or if gender is socially constructed, something must be socially constructed because otherwise, how can we live in a society if nobody constructed it? Because in case you haven’t noticed: we live in a society.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,412,577
@1,412,213 (Male2Male)
There are many things that precede culture.
Each culture has unique practices, which are arbitrary and created by that society.
But there are also rules about how humans behave that are true whether a society chooses to believe them. Men and women have differences in their behavior, and a few exceptions to that rule don't change the average.
A society that constructs ways to manage those differences will fare better than a society that thinks they can just choose to be a society without those differences.
Male2Male joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 19 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,412,583
@previous (A)
I’m going to be honest: I’ve never had a problem dealing with women in my life before because they have different biology. I don’t know why, that just never came up.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,412,588
@1,412,585 (Male2Male)
I asked you specifically, do you find it weird that all these spiritual writings across cultures have this idea? but that your idea is contrary to all of it?
If I was in that position, I think I'd at least stop and say "why?" even if I didn't change my position.
Male2Male replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,412,590
@previous (A)
My thing is, men and women are different obviously. The way you’re talking about it like you think it’s some profound insight that men and women are different just seems kinda silly to me honestly. I know I’m not a woman, what is there to be thought about exactly?