Topic: Fora you think trump will do the same with cuba?
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago#131,957
I cant really see a reason since the country is also a shithole too. not sure they form much of threat unless it becomes another cuba missle crisis situation and perhaps this time china/russia might provide military prescence.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 11 minutes later[^][v]#1,410,137
The problem with this line of thinking is the United States is not the only country with this type of capability. China could do the same thing to the president of Taiwan.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,410,142
Anything you do to your enemies, your enemies can do to you. There’s a reason why international law exists. Without it, things will degrade back to the way it was in World War One when using chemical weapons was acceptable.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,410,144
@previous (A)
The United States is only 4% of the world population, we aren’t the only country with nuclear weapons. What happens when one country starts imposing its will, isn’t submission, what’s going to happen is the European Union, Russia, and China are going to start fighting over spreading their respective ideologies around the world. You can’t just make the entire world submit by calling random countries shitholes, that’s just going to inspire resistance.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,410,146
@1,410,142 (B)
man World War 1.. I was just playing battlefield 1 in conquest and during the match I was bombed with chem gas until i got sniped. playing that match reminded me that war is brutal and theres no respawns.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 51 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,410,161
As with Venezuela or Iraq or Afghanistan or Libya etc. the US could easily take out the leadership of the country quickly. The problem always becomes "Then What?".
Anyway, I'm sure our Peace President has this all figured out. 👍
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,410,163
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Well, since Japan, every time the "then what" has been 20 years and trillions of dollars wasted on fighting dudes in sandals only to embarrassingly leave the country and have the enemy instantly take over the place.
a lot of "oh no dont do that. oh man thats not cool we should respect le laws and stuff :( #thoughtsnprayer" in that list. most of them dont even give a fuck lol
You don’t strike me as very intelligent. Trump has said he has interest in pushing right wing ideology in Europe and the EU has been attempting to regulate American social media companies. It’s not as bad as the situation with China where China outright blocks all American social media, but you have to be blind to not see what’s going on here.
Anonymous G double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,410,174
Brazil actually blocked Twitter for refusing to adhere to a court order, they unblocked it when Twitter finally complied. Unlike China, democracies have to come up with legal justifications for these sorts of things, but there’s clearly a desire there that wasn’t there before.
Anonymous G triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,410,178
The reason why it’s easy to dismiss it as "they don’t actually care" is because they’re smart enough to do these things slowly so that you don’t notice it. They’re not all a bunch of idiots who give away their hand.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,410,182
The US already has a military base on the island, which the Cuban government says is illegal.
The could deploy from there, but there isn't much point. Cuba doesn't have oil reserves like Venezuela, and they aren't a military threat now that the Soviet Union has shrunk.
Anonymous I triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,410,187
The problem of starting a war in a country with a lot of oil with big ethnic divisions is everybody wants that oil, and both sides have oil, which leads to shenanigans nobody talks about because nobody in the west wants to talk about the time the UK and the USSR were on the same side against the Vatican and China. Because nobody ever needs to bring that up.
> > > https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/world-reacts-us-strikes-venezuela-2026-01-03/ > > > > a lot of "oh no dont do that. oh man thats not cool we should respect le laws and stuff :( #thoughtsnprayer" in that list. most of them dont even give a fuck lol > > You don’t strike me as very intelligent. Trump has said he has interest in pushing right wing ideology in Europe and the EU has been attempting to regulate American social media companies. It’s not as bad as the situation with China where China outright blocks all American social media, but you have to be blind to not see what’s going on here. > >https://www.npr.org/2025/12/05/nx-s1-5634694/x-musk-eu-fines
and it seems like you suffer from severe case of assumption all because I was making a comment on the various countries and their reaction to whats going on. I already saw what trump was doing way before he even got reelected. most of us already saw this coming. its not new.
all you're saying is water is wet. we know wiseguy.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 33 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,410,236
@1,410,202 (H)
Oil. He bombed Nigeria on Christmas, Nigeria had been buying weapons from the United States to fight terrorists and he turned on Nigeria out of nowhere. They’re building one of the world’s largest oil refineries in Nigeria. Donald Trump did not care about terrorism in Nigeria at all until Nigeria decided to take control of its own resources.
Anonymous J double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,410,237
It’s also racism. They don’t want Africans to control their own resources, and they don’t want China to build infrastructure in Africa because they don’t want Africa to develop.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 16 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,410,250
@previous (C)
Back in the 1800s when Africans didn’t have guns and Europeans did, it kinda made sense the Africans lost to the Europeans. In the 1990s when the white South Africans built nuclear bombs and they lost to the blacks who didn’t have nuclear bombs… that one’s a little bit harder to explain.