Topic: Which of these notoriously racist people/cultures is the more racist?
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #131,502
Which of these notoriously racist people/cultures is the more racist?
Some internet dude joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 51 minutes later[^] [v] #1,406,488
I think South Africans are more racist for two reasons:
1. They lost in the 1990s
2. They lost to black people
Germany, Italy, and Japan lost in World War Two, but you have to understand, Germany lost to white people, and Japan lost because they didn’t invent nuclear weapons first. The white South Africans invented nuclear weapons first, and they still lost… to black people. They’re going to have a chip on their shoulder for generations because of that.
1. They lost in the 1990s
2. They lost to black people
Germany, Italy, and Japan lost in World War Two, but you have to understand, Germany lost to white people, and Japan lost because they didn’t invent nuclear weapons first. The white South Africans invented nuclear weapons first, and they still lost… to black people. They’re going to have a chip on their shoulder for generations because of that.
Some internet dude double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,489
Like, Germany lost. Germany didn’t lose to Israel specifically after Germany invented nuclear weapons first. You get what I mean? It’s like if Japan invented nuclear weapons, and then they lost to the Koreans somehow. That’s going to hurt a racists ego pretty bad.
Some internet dude triple-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,492
They literally had to take the bombs apart because they knew the blacks were going to get their hands on them but they still had to hand over the uranium to the blacks anyway.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Some internet dude joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,495
Despite all that, I still think Japanese cock tastes the best.
Some internet dude replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,496
@previous (Some internet dude)
> Despite all that, I still think Japanese cock tastes the best.
Yeah, it’s because they shower. That’s why women can’t stand to be within 6 feet of you. COVID is over, they’re not social distancing.
> Despite all that, I still think Japanese cock tastes the best.
Yeah, it’s because they shower. That’s why women can’t stand to be within 6 feet of you. COVID is over, they’re not social distancing.
Some internet dude replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,497
@previous (Some internet dude)
Although dirty cock can still be good if it doesn't have that week old sweat clinging to their nutsack.
Although dirty cock can still be good if it doesn't have that week old sweat clinging to their nutsack.
Some internet dude double-posted this 1 month ago, 53 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,500
I just like cock. I always have. It's like a craving that won't go away.
Some internet dude triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,501
I like the Arby's slogan, "We have the meats", well bring it to me dammit.
Some internet dude replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,504
It’s weird you think impersonating me and saying gay stuff would hurt my reputation more than you being a racist already hurts yours.
Some internet dude double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,505
If you don’t like what I said, you could have like… not developed nuclear weapons just to lose to people you claimed were biologically inferior who didn’t have nuclear weapons. If you didn’t want to be embarrassed by me speaking, you could have just not have done what I said you did and then nobody would be saying it.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,566
@1,406,488 (Some internet dude)
> I think South Africans are more racist for two reasons:
>
> 1. They lost in the 1990s
>
> 2. They lost to black people
>
> Germany, Italy, and Japan lost in World War Two, but you have to understand, Germany lost to white people, and Japan lost because they didn’t invent nuclear weapons first. The white South Africans invented nuclear weapons first, and they still lost… to black people. They’re going to have a chip on their shoulder for generations because of that.
Japan lost because it ran a strategy of folly and lacked fuel and logistics. Island seizures and an Asian land war with relatively limited means. Midway destroyed the fleet. The depleted Kwantung Army was annihilated by the Soviets, the worst land battle defeat in Japanese history.
60% of Japanese military casualties resulted from starvation and disease. Soldiers were making their own shoes by 1943.
The army and navy didn’t talk to each other. The navy concealed the Midway disaster from the army. Bushido was so rooted in “honor” and face saving that lying and foolish command decisions were commonplace.
Japan should have thrown its weight into conquering Siberia and seizing Vladivostok in 1941 like the army wanted to do.
> I think South Africans are more racist for two reasons:
>
> 1. They lost in the 1990s
>
> 2. They lost to black people
>
> Germany, Italy, and Japan lost in World War Two, but you have to understand, Germany lost to white people, and Japan lost because they didn’t invent nuclear weapons first. The white South Africans invented nuclear weapons first, and they still lost… to black people. They’re going to have a chip on their shoulder for generations because of that.
Japan lost because it ran a strategy of folly and lacked fuel and logistics. Island seizures and an Asian land war with relatively limited means. Midway destroyed the fleet. The depleted Kwantung Army was annihilated by the Soviets, the worst land battle defeat in Japanese history.
60% of Japanese military casualties resulted from starvation and disease. Soldiers were making their own shoes by 1943.
The army and navy didn’t talk to each other. The navy concealed the Midway disaster from the army. Bushido was so rooted in “honor” and face saving that lying and foolish command decisions were commonplace.
Japan should have thrown its weight into conquering Siberia and seizing Vladivostok in 1941 like the army wanted to do.
Some internet dude joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 18 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,574
Some internet dude double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,575
Whatever the case is, the Japanese should have realized they were screwed when they realized they were fighting a naval war in an era where ships were powered by oil, when they didn’t have any oil. That should have been the first sign they were screwed.
Some internet dude triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,576
Fun fact: the Japanese got their steel from Korea and Manchuria. So they couldn’t build or power their ships with their own resources.
Some internet dude quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,577
Now that their neighbors are industrialized, there’s really no hope for a second Japanese empire, it’s just never going to happen. They screwed up the first time, they’re never getting a second chance.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,599
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,406,616
I've never met a nice South African