Topic: Sorry, EbolaBoy. The 2020 guilt for the accidental death of junkie POS George Floyd is dead.
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 months ago#131,183
A parasite junkie who held a gun to a woman’s stomach can’t transform into a martyr just because he crashed out due to drugs and positional asphyxiation.
The liberalization of law enforcement and end of cash bail just caused a crime explosion.
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,273
If I’m being completely honest, I actually don’t really know why George Floyd’s death went viral like that was the first time a black dude got killed by a white cop, but that’s just me though.
> If I’m being completely honest, I actually don’t really know why George Floyd’s death went viral like that was the first time a black dude got killed by a white cop, but that’s just me though.
Bored kids in lockdown wanted to get out of the house.
EbolaBoy double-posted this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,312
I’ve noticed this before more than once. Different racists have different levels of intelligence, but I’d say the bottom 25% of racists, the ones that aren’t really too bright, when they get into it, you realize that their hatred starts sounding more and more like a gay fantasy.
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,460
I think murder is bad, at the same time 50 people get murdered every day in the US. Crime happens everywhere all the time, people only cherry pick examples of somebody from a group they don’t like doing a crime to somebody they like in order to push their agenda. Everybody does it, liberals do it, conservatives do it, only I find conservatives more annoying because they’re racist. Overall, if I’m being totally honest, I never have an emotional reaction to hearing someone was murdered, I feel more angry at people trying to politicize murder to push their goals. In this case OP trying to use it to push his anti black narrative, because he’s a pathetic weasel.
EbolaBoy double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,461
I have noticed a correlation between stupidity and being outraged at every single murder or robbery that’s ever happened. If the exact same thing happened but the cop was black and the guy that got killed was white, OP would be kicking and screaming about how blacks are uncivilized. It’s all bullshit, people are bullshit.
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,466
@1,404,464 (N)
7,700 people on average die every day in the United States. Did you cry 7,700 times today? The point I’m making isn’t immoral or stupid or psychopathic, I’m just being real here. People care about things because they decide to.
In 2018 the FBI reported that 81% of white victims were killed by white people and 89% of black victims were killed by black people.
Black people aren’t killing white people and white people aren’t killing black people. White people live in white neighborhoods, black people live in black neighborhoods, people kill people they know most of the time. Every so often on the margins a black kills a white or a white kills a black and idiots get riled up about it. Sorry but that’s the truth. Now most cops are white, if more cops were black, there wouldn’t be a racial disparity between blacks and whites in crime statistics at all.
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,476
@previous (N)
Whites kill other white people at a very similar rate to the rate at which black people kill other black people. You’re being an idiot right now.
EbolaBoy double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,479
I mean, if you white people are really so smart and so high IQ as you say you are, if you acknowledge the fact that most of the time when a black person gets murdered, it’s by another black person, surely you must be able to extrapolate the logical consequence of this which is that, almost every time a black person kills someone, they’re not targeting a white person. Therefore, the narrative that black people are targeting white people or that black people are committing violent crime against white people actually isn’t true at all. White people by and large are actually not the victims of black criminals. Crazy. You know, there’s this thing called thinking maybe you should try it sometime.
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,481
In fact, I’ll go one step further. The rate at which black people kill black people is higher than the rate at which white people kill white people. The logical consequence of this is that more white people are killing non-whites than blacks are killing non-blacks, therefore if you’re not white or black, whites are actually more dangerous to you than blacks are. And would you look at that? The data for Hispanics and Latinos says they’re more likely to get killed by white people than black people.
Hispanics or Latinos killed by whites in 2018: 772
Hispanics or Latinos killed by blacks in 2018: 143
> I mean, if you white people are really so smart and so high IQ as you say you are, if you acknowledge the fact that most of the time when a black person gets murdered, it’s by another black person, surely you must be able to extrapolate the logical consequence of this which is that, almost every time a black person kills someone, they’re not targeting a white person.
This is retarded even for you. 89% of black murders being commited by blacks doesn't mean they're not also targeting whites. That's like saying "you drank 89% of the milk in the fridge so you can't possibly have drunk 76% of the juice too".
Congratulations on proving every stereotype about low IQ blacks.
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,483
@previous (N)
If it doesn’t mean that blacks aren’t also targeting whites, then how come the majority of white murders are committed by whites? If it didn’t mean that they’re not also targeting whites, then why is it the case that they’re not targeting whites?
EbolaBoy triple-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,486
In 2018, blacks killed 514 white people, and 2,600 black people. If they’re intentionally targeting whites, and whites are the majority of the population, if they were killing people randomly, you’d think that most of the victims would be white if they weren’t targeting whites. But most of the victims of black murderers are black people not white people, so you can’t even say that black people just aren’t not intentionally killing white people as targets, you’d have to concede that black people are actually avoiding killing white people.
EbolaBoy quintuple-posted this 2 months ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,489
The reason why you’re confused about my logic is that logic can be probabilistic. The situation you have is possible, but highly improbable. You used an example of a human drinking milk and juice. The difference is that milk can’t drink you. If all races commit murder it is highly highly improbable that "most black people are killed by black people" and "most people who aren’t black are killed by black people" are both true statements unless black people are the majority of the population and/or other groups almost never commit murder, neither of which are remotely true. Therefore, my logic actually is valid.
EbolaBoy sextuple-posted this 2 months ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,493
For the sake of simplicity, there are 100 murders in the US in a year. This isn’t true, but for the sake of argument. 13 people were murdered by blacks, 87 people were murdered by non-blacks. Say the following year, the black murder rate doubles, the murder rate of everybody else stays the same. Now 26 people were murdered by blacks and 87 people were murdered by non blacks. This raises the total to 113 murders. 26 is 23% of 113. So you can see that the percentage of the murders committed by blacks is growing at a slower rate than the number of murders committed by blacks. (This is why my logic works).
If 87 murders are committed by non-blacks, in order for blacks to commit as many murders as non-blacks, blacks need to commit 87 murders. 87 divided by 13 is roughly 6.7 but let’s just round it to 7.
There is no reason why black people would commit murder at 700% the rate of everybody else. That is very improbable.
EbolaBoy septuple-posted this 2 months ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,494
The consequence of that is that either black people are investing most of their effort in killing blacks and almost none of their effort in killing other people or they’re investing almost all of their effort in killing non-blacks and almost none of their effort in killing blacks. So it is actually logical to say that if most black people are being killed by other black people and black people are a minority it is much, much more likely that black people kill a very small number of non-blacks relative to other racial groups, which is what is reflected in the actual data.
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,496
@OP
Your lack of empathy is noted, along with the Doctor referring to the Sandy Hook victims as a "pile of dead kids" and making light of Jeffery Epstein's under-aged sex trafficking activities.
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 49 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,504
@1,404,493 (EbolaBoy)
If x is the number of times higher the rate that blacks murder people is than the rate whites murder people, then the percentage of murders committed by blacks would be 100(13x/(x+87)).
If you divide 100(13x/(x+87)) by x you get the ratio of how fast the percentage of blacks is growing relative to how many x times higher the black murder rate is compared to everybody else.
If you graph f(x)= 100(13x/(x+87))/x, you can see it has a limit of 0 as x approaches infinity. It just tails off forever. Basically, the higher you want to increase the murder rate of blacks, you need to increase x by a disproportionate amount.
If you plug in some numbers
f(1)=13%
f(7)=50%
f(11)=60%
f(17)=70%
f(28)=80%
f(61)=90%
It’s not a linear relationship, the amount by which you have to increase x increases at an increasing rate.
Anonymous U double-posted this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,404,505
So for example, to go from blacks doing 50% to 60% of murders, their murder rate has to get 157% larger not 10%. And to go from 80% to 90%, their murder rate would have to become 218% larger