Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,041
Have enjoyed many a nude beach and nude resort.
99.9% of the time you do not see a male in an aroused state.
Nude living is sensual not sexual. However sure on reflection when back home one might remember something totally desirable and use that in love making with lover or self.
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 53 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,049
Regarding cultures where women being topless was considered to be normal before Europeans arrived, that has more to do with the fact that breasts aren’t really a reproductive organ. It’s not that they don’t have a concept of nudity or indecency, it’s just that they consider reproductive organs to be reproductive organs, which technically makes more sense if you actually think about it. Because I mean really think about it, why are breasts nudity? A woman can show her cleavage in the west as long as she doesn’t expose her nipples. But that’s the part that men have though. It’s not really logical.
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 18 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,085
@previous (F)
Probably because you’re old and you saw pictures of starving Africans in the 1980s. The human body uses fat for energy first, but then when the fat is gone it starts eating away at your muscles. Your muscles are what hold your guts in.
EbolaBoy double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,086
There’s actually a lot less starvation in Africa now even though Africa has a significantly higher population than it did back then. It’s not because Africans started growing more food, even though it’s the poorest continent, they’ve improved enough economically that now they import $50 billion worth of food every year.
> Probably because you’re old and you saw pictures of starving Africans in the 1980s. The human body uses fat for energy first, but then when the fat is gone it starts eating away at your muscles. Your muscles are what hold your guts in.
That’s not it. The bodies of “stone age” tribal peoples are heavily exerted and subjected to the elements. They don’t look good, whether Inuit, Amazon or elsewhere.
I’m not talking about all. For instance, I met some Maasai in Kenya. They’re basically a super race. I shook a 62 year old man’s hand. I lift 5x a week. He could have crushed my hand.
EbolaBoy replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,091
It’s actually a kind of stupidly obvious thing when you realize it. Africa is rich in resources you can’t eat, but they were starving. In the past Europe stole from them, so they kept starving. Then they became independent and traded with the outside world, but they were starving so they couldn’t afford food so they kept starving, until eventually, they made enough money they could just buy food and now they aren’t starving. Instead of one exploiting the other, it turns out Africa and the rest of the world can both be richer from mutual gains through trade. Who would have thought? E c o n o m i c s
EbolaBoy double-posted this 2 months ago, 57 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,092
@1,404,090 (H)
They’re not really Stone Age though, Africans had iron before the Europeans arrived. They were fighting the Europeans with spears, but the part people leave out is the spears weren’t made from stone.
EbolaBoy sextuple-posted this 2 months ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,097
If intelligence does have a genetic component, it is interesting when you look at statistics Nazis cite that say Nigerians have low IQs, and then you look into the data on how well Nigerians do in university when they immigrate to the United States. They’re actually one of the most educated minority groups even when compared with East Asians.
EbolaBoy septuple-posted this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,098
…there are actually more Nigerian international students than Japanese international students, even though Japanese people are 30x richer. It makes you wonder what would happen if these people actually had the same starting position.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,100
@1,404,091 (EbolaBoy) > Africa is rich in resources you can’t eat, but they were starving. In the past Europe stole from them, so they kept starving.
food grows year round but africas are too stupid to eat, lol
EbolaBoy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,101
@previous (I)
Believe it or not the actual reason why black people don’t farm much is because they perceive farmers as having low social status and they see opportunity in cities. Africa is actually urbanizing incredibly quickly because of this.
EbolaBoy quadruple-posted this 2 months ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,104
A consequence of this is that Africa has a growing population that’s already pretty large, so if people move to cities while the population is growing, the cities can grow faster than the population will grow. So there are some projections that the world’s largest cities at the end of the century will wind up being in Africa. For example, there are projections that Lagos in 2100 could end up having twice as many people as Tokyo has today (80 million vs 40 million). I’m skeptical they’ll get that big. But it will be interesting to see how that plays out.
EbolaBoy quintuple-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,404,105
…of course they’re talking about metro area. Since Lagos either has like 8 million people or 20 million depending on whether you use the official city limits or the metro population.