Topic: Trump threatens death on US Senators
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 months ago #131,011
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 30 minutes later[^] [v] #1,402,925
About time! Clean the damn swamp already.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 40 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,936
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday President Trump does not actually want to see members of Congress executed despite his social media post earlier in the day, calling a video by some members "seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH!"
> "seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH!"
> "seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH!"
Trumps gene line is 100% Nazi German.
> "seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH!"
> "seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH!"
Trumps gene line is 100% Nazi German.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,937
White people: "Africa isn’t poor because of colonialism it’s poor because they have corrupt governments"
White people 5 minutes later: *corruption intensities*
White people 5 minutes later: *corruption intensities*
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,938
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,941
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 21 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,112
@1,402,937 (D)
> White people: "Africa isn’t poor because of colonialism it’s poor because they have corrupt governments"
>
> White people 5 minutes later: *corruption intensities*
Africa is poor due to both. Aid gets funneled into offshore bank accounts the leadership uses to ply elites and the army. Wealth concentration is hyper stratified. And yes colonialism endures through resource exports. Check out the Safari Group of Western and MENA nations that conspired to keep these elites in power in the 1970s and beyond.
> White people: "Africa isn’t poor because of colonialism it’s poor because they have corrupt governments"
>
> White people 5 minutes later: *corruption intensities*
Africa is poor due to both. Aid gets funneled into offshore bank accounts the leadership uses to ply elites and the army. Wealth concentration is hyper stratified. And yes colonialism endures through resource exports. Check out the Safari Group of Western and MENA nations that conspired to keep these elites in power in the 1970s and beyond.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,116
@previous (F)
The point of the aid isn’t to help Africa develop. If it was they’d be roads, trains, ports, and factories, and then Africa just wouldn’t be poor.
The point of the aid isn’t to help Africa develop. If it was they’d be roads, trains, ports, and factories, and then Africa just wouldn’t be poor.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,151
@1,403,112 (F)
Africa is poor because africans are so stupid they barely qualify as sentient. Average IQ continent wide is sixty, and thats with the middle eastern north neutralizing the hilariously low average IQ of 45 for liberia and seirra leone.
Africa is poor because africans are so stupid they barely qualify as sentient. Average IQ continent wide is sixty, and thats with the middle eastern north neutralizing the hilariously low average IQ of 45 for liberia and seirra leone.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
DEI hire joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,162
@previous (H)
Has it ever occurred to you that IQ scores aren’t percentages, they’re based on percentiles. Someone with an IQ of 60 didn’t get 60% of the questions right. A 60 IQ is 0.4 percentile. Meaning if 99.6% of people score higher than you on an IQ test, you have an IQ of 60. Now you see, the tiny little problem with this, is Africa has 1.5 billion people, and if 99.6% of people scored higher than all Africans on an IQ test, that would mean the world would have to have a population of least 375 billion people.
Has it ever occurred to you that IQ scores aren’t percentages, they’re based on percentiles. Someone with an IQ of 60 didn’t get 60% of the questions right. A 60 IQ is 0.4 percentile. Meaning if 99.6% of people score higher than you on an IQ test, you have an IQ of 60. Now you see, the tiny little problem with this, is Africa has 1.5 billion people, and if 99.6% of people scored higher than all Africans on an IQ test, that would mean the world would have to have a population of least 375 billion people.
DEI hire double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,163
DEI hire triple-posted this 2 months ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,166
The problem with IQ scores and race realism is that IQ scores aren’t a linear scale, but people like thinking about numbers on a linear scale. Africans aren’t dumber than everyone else in the world, but even if they were hypothetically dumber than everyone else in the world, if there are 1.5 billion Africans and 8.2 billion total people in the world, then Africans are about 18% of the population, which means it’s not possible for Africans to score lower than the other 82% of the population. An 18th percentile IQ is an IQ score of 80. Any source that cites "statistics" that aren’t mathematically possible is propaganda not science.
Anonymous H replied with this 2 months ago, 34 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,167
DEI hire replied with this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,168
I mean, basically what you’re saying is, is you’re claiming that Africans are so dumb that 18% of the population is dumber than 99.6% of the population, but if we hypothetically take that as a fact and say that that’s true, that 99.6% of people are smarter than 18% of people, via the pigeonhole principle, that would mean that at least 17.6% of people are both Africans who are dumber than non-Africans and non-Africans who are smarter than Africans at the same time, which is nonsensical.
(Edited 59 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,169
DEI hire replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,170
DEI hire double-posted this 2 months ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,173
…can you just help me understand why you heard someone say that a natural language exists that has only 300 words? I mean, just think about this for a second: how many different species of animals and plants are there in nature? Imagine the most primitive least advanced tribe you can think of. What setting do you imagine them in? Probably a natural setting. There are a lot more than 300 things in nature. I honestly don’t even understand how or why you would even believe something like that unless you’re just really, really stupid.
DEI hire triple-posted this 2 months ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,175
The only possible excuse I can think of, to where that would make sense is if a linguist went to Africa and was just really, really lazy. Some words are used more frequently than other words in all languages. For example, word use in English has a logarithmic distribution, so if you look at English text, 50% of the words are the top 100 most frequently used words. So if a linguist was looking at a language, and this hypothetical linguist was really, really, really dumb, they might think, "Oh, when I read English text, the same 100 words keep coming up 50% of the time, English must only have 200 words total!"
DEI hire quadruple-posted this 2 months ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,403,177
I mean, it doesn’t even make sense from the perspective of, most native African religions are polytheistic. So for example, how would Yoruba have less than 300 words if they have more than 300 deities? Like why would you believe that?