Topic: Evidence is criminal trials is becoming obsolete.
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 months ago #130,956
www.nbcnews.com/news/rcna235976
What's worse? Accepting video evidence when anyone can generate it, or banning video evidence when it's the only evidence of a crime?
What's worse? Accepting video evidence when anyone can generate it, or banning video evidence when it's the only evidence of a crime?
boof joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 17 hours later[^] [v] #1,402,686
it never mattered in Texas one way or the other, it's like China
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,687
Citing the plaintiffs’ use of AI-generated material masquerading as real evidence, Kolakowski dismissed the case on Sept. 9. The plaintiffs sought reconsideration of her decision, arguing the judge suspected but failed to prove that the evidence was AI-generated. Judge Kolakowski denied their request for reconsideration on Nov. 6. The plaintiffs did not respond to a request for comment.> The plaintiffs did not respond to a request for comment.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 21 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,690
@1,402,686 (boof)
> it never mattered in Texas one way or the other, it's like China
Texan is another kinda Chinese. Think about it: they both love executions.
> it never mattered in Texas one way or the other, it's like China
Texan is another kinda Chinese. Think about it: they both love executions.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 5 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,780
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 4 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,782
@1,402,687 (C)
This one was probably fake, but it's concerning a judge can just feel in their gut that it's not real and dismiss it.
A lot of people are calling real videos AI, it won't be long until someone submits a real tape and a judge accuses them of AI with no evidence.
This one was probably fake, but it's concerning a judge can just feel in their gut that it's not real and dismiss it.
A lot of people are calling real videos AI, it won't be long until someone submits a real tape and a judge accuses them of AI with no evidence.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,816
somehow human civiliation managed 1000s of years without relying on video evidence. we'll manage again. whats new is old. whats old is new