Topic: On the Tuesday vote
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 months ago #130,934
R I P
NatasDasDas joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,402,484
My condolences
boof joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 42 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,487
voices carry
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,506
Is this about the Epstein files? I bet that Matt is in them... That sicko...
45-47 joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,508
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,526
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 25 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,528
Votes are in, was almost unanimous. Now for the senate drama next.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,529
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y replied with this 2 months ago, 13 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,531
@previous (H)
> I wonder who the 1 vote against was.
Republican Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana was the only House member to vote against the Epstein files bill. In a post on X, Higgins explained his reasons for opposing the measure, saying the files will inadvertently entangle innocent people if they are released.
"I have been a principled 'NO' on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc.," Higgins wrote. "If enacted in its current form, this type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files, released to a rabid media, will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt. Not by my vote."
His concerns echoed those expressed by Johnson and others, who argue that the legislative language needs to change to prevent the release of information that could compromise investigations or other sensitive material. The bill's supporters dismiss those concerns and say the bill includes provisions to block such disclosures.
Higgins continued: "The Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation that has already released well over 60,000 pages of documents from the Epstein case. That effort will continue in a manner that provides all due protections for innocent Americans. If the Senate amends the bill to properly address [the] privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House."
> I wonder who the 1 vote against was.
Republican Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana was the only House member to vote against the Epstein files bill. In a post on X, Higgins explained his reasons for opposing the measure, saying the files will inadvertently entangle innocent people if they are released.
"I have been a principled 'NO' on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc.," Higgins wrote. "If enacted in its current form, this type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files, released to a rabid media, will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt. Not by my vote."
His concerns echoed those expressed by Johnson and others, who argue that the legislative language needs to change to prevent the release of information that could compromise investigations or other sensitive material. The bill's supporters dismiss those concerns and say the bill includes provisions to block such disclosures.
Higgins continued: "The Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation that has already released well over 60,000 pages of documents from the Epstein case. That effort will continue in a manner that provides all due protections for innocent Americans. If the Senate amends the bill to properly address [the] privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House."
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,534
@previous (+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y)
Clay Higgins was one of the girls, escaped, and transitioned to make it in the good old boys club in Louisiana.
If the files are released then everyone will know he has a vag and fucked a Jew, ending his political career in the state.
Clay Higgins was one of the girls, escaped, and transitioned to make it in the good old boys club in Louisiana.
If the files are released then everyone will know he has a vag and fucked a Jew, ending his political career in the state.
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y replied with this 2 months ago, 13 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,535
@previous (I)> Clay Higgins was one of the girls, escaped, and transitioned to make it in the good old boys club in Louisiana.
>
> If the files are released then everyone will know he has a vag and fucked a Jew, ending his political career in the state.
This is him and Wife - Does NOT look like she would put up with what you in humor of course imply.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,536
Anonymous J double-posted this 2 months ago, 7 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,537
The other guy he’s sitting next to has killed some reporters, she should know better than to ask a stupid question like that.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,539
Anonymous J replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,540
boof replied with this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,542
I wonder what files Trump flushed down his golf course toilet a few years agao
Meta joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 4 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,578
I feel raped and attacked.
boof joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,607
Meta double-posted this 2 months ago, 29 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,608
boof triple-posted this 2 months ago, 20 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,609
Meta quadruple-posted this 2 months ago, 16 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,610
Meta quintuple-posted this 2 months ago, 26 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,611
Seriously, if you don’t cut that out I’m gonna punch you.