Topic: The Jews are still trying to slander Hitler.
Tired Erik !saAqdaazn2 started this discussion 2 months ago #130,795
Worried that Hitler will continue to be popular with the younger generation a Jewish scientist somehow found a splatter of blood, assumed it belonged to Hitler and declared he had a micro penis.
Confused Gaz from Lewisham joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #1,401,726
I only follow men with massive knobs.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 6 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,744
I don’t get what people see in Hitler. He was an abject failure. One could argue his war led to the end of colonialism and white supremacy and kicked off Europe’s importing of foreign workers.
DEI guy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 37 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,745
@previous (C)
Erik’s real name is Svet which is a Slavic name, and he’s British. I feel like I shouldn’t have to explain why that’s dumb, but I will anyway. Hitler killed more Slavs than Jews and he bombed London.
Erik’s real name is Svet which is a Slavic name, and he’s British. I feel like I shouldn’t have to explain why that’s dumb, but I will anyway. Hitler killed more Slavs than Jews and he bombed London.
DEI guy double-posted this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,747
I really don’t understand the obsession that Europeans have with their losers. I’ve never once seen a black person be like, "Ha! The British are afraid what will happen if Idi Amin becomes popular again! Idi Amin could have won his war with Tanzania, he almost won guys! Idi Amin almost won!"
Anonymous C replied with this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,748
@previous (DEI guy)
> I really don’t understand the obsession that Europeans have with their losers. I’ve never once seen a black person be like, "Ha! The British are afraid what will happen if Idi Amin becomes popular again! Idi Amin could have won his war with Tanzania, he almost won guys! Idi Amin almost won!"
Blacks are quicker to call bullshit - just not always in front of whites to have it then used against them. Remember Jussie Smollett? The black community was dead silent.
> I really don’t understand the obsession that Europeans have with their losers. I’ve never once seen a black person be like, "Ha! The British are afraid what will happen if Idi Amin becomes popular again! Idi Amin could have won his war with Tanzania, he almost won guys! Idi Amin almost won!"
Blacks are quicker to call bullshit - just not always in front of whites to have it then used against them. Remember Jussie Smollett? The black community was dead silent.
DEI guy replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,749
Although, Idi Amin’s lack of military success was probably because instead of trying to develop Uganda’s industry, the moment Uganda became independent he was so ambitious he was like, "I’m doing the war right now."
DEI guy double-posted this 2 months ago, 39 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,750
@1,401,748 (C)
Tbh there are so many famous people he’s one of the famous people I haven’t heard of.
Tbh there are so many famous people he’s one of the famous people I haven’t heard of.
DEI guy triple-posted this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,751
I think humanity would be better off if we stopped putting narcissistic crazy people who think they can take over the world in power. I think there are two or three countries right now where they’ve made that mistake but I’m not gonna say which ones they are because we all know I can’t say that.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,757
@1,401,749 (DEI guy)
> Although, Idi Amin’s lack of military success was probably because instead of trying to develop Uganda’s industry, the moment Uganda became independent he was so ambitious he was like, "I’m doing the war right now."
African militaries are notoriously bad because so many leaders fear competence becomes a coup. Most African armies fire about five training rounds a year, are on their own to make up meals and extras, don’t have medical care or glasses. Rwanda is a huge exception. Emphasis goes on familial networks and security forces - what we used to see in Latin America or even the Chinese warlord period.
> Although, Idi Amin’s lack of military success was probably because instead of trying to develop Uganda’s industry, the moment Uganda became independent he was so ambitious he was like, "I’m doing the war right now."
African militaries are notoriously bad because so many leaders fear competence becomes a coup. Most African armies fire about five training rounds a year, are on their own to make up meals and extras, don’t have medical care or glasses. Rwanda is a huge exception. Emphasis goes on familial networks and security forces - what we used to see in Latin America or even the Chinese warlord period.
Tired Erik !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,764
@1,401,745 (DEI guy)
My real name is not Svet, Svetla was the name of an ex girlfriend from Bulgaria. Im a a true Anglo Saxon.
My real name is not Svet, Svetla was the name of an ex girlfriend from Bulgaria. Im a a true Anglo Saxon.
DEI gyy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,768
@previous (Tired Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Hitler wouldn’t be down with you dating a Slav either… or with you being British to be honest. If I as a black guy praised Hitler people would call me self hating, but he killed more British people than black people.
Hitler wouldn’t be down with you dating a Slav either… or with you being British to be honest. If I as a black guy praised Hitler people would call me self hating, but he killed more British people than black people.
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 36 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,769
DEI gyy replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,770
@1,401,757 (C)
> African militaries are notoriously bad because so many leaders fear competence becomes a coup. Most African armies fire about five training rounds a year
I’m gonna be honest - that sounds like BS. Authoritarian countries tend to be more militaristic than democracies most of the time. Although, not all African countries are authoritarian.
> African militaries are notoriously bad because so many leaders fear competence becomes a coup. Most African armies fire about five training rounds a year
I’m gonna be honest - that sounds like BS. Authoritarian countries tend to be more militaristic than democracies most of the time. Although, not all African countries are authoritarian.
DEI gyy double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,771
@1,401,769 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
> Hitler didn't kill a single British person, not even in ww1.
This has to be rage bait there no way you didn’t know that the Nazis invented rockets with turbo pumps just so they could increase the range in order to indiscriminately kill more British civilians.
> Hitler didn't kill a single British person, not even in ww1.
This has to be rage bait there no way you didn’t know that the Nazis invented rockets with turbo pumps just so they could increase the range in order to indiscriminately kill more British civilians.
DEI guy triple-posted this 2 months ago, 28 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,775
@1,401,770 (DEI gyy)
Also, Tanzania is an African country, so even if it were true that all African countries had bad militaries, that isn’t really an explanation for why one African country lost a war to another African country.
Also, Tanzania is an African country, so even if it were true that all African countries had bad militaries, that isn’t really an explanation for why one African country lost a war to another African country.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 5 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,806
@1,401,770 (DEI gyy)
> > African militaries are notoriously bad because so many leaders fear competence becomes a coup. Most African armies fire about five training rounds a year
>
>
> I’m gonna be honest - that sounds like BS. Authoritarian countries tend to be more militaristic than democracies most of the time. Although, not all African countries are authoritarian.
Dictatorships often neuter their militaries. Saddam Hussein kept the best equipment and training for the Republican Guard and ringed Bagdad with them.
North Korea has nukes but much of its forces rotate into medical due to lack of food. The parade troops gets better rations. Neat marching doesn’t translate into effective fighting. If it did all the McDojo clowns would dominate MMA.
> > African militaries are notoriously bad because so many leaders fear competence becomes a coup. Most African armies fire about five training rounds a year
>
>
> I’m gonna be honest - that sounds like BS. Authoritarian countries tend to be more militaristic than democracies most of the time. Although, not all African countries are authoritarian.
Dictatorships often neuter their militaries. Saddam Hussein kept the best equipment and training for the Republican Guard and ringed Bagdad with them.
North Korea has nukes but much of its forces rotate into medical due to lack of food. The parade troops gets better rations. Neat marching doesn’t translate into effective fighting. If it did all the McDojo clowns would dominate MMA.
Anonymous G double-posted this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,807
@1,401,775 (DEI guy)
> Also, Tanzania is an African country, so even if it were true that all African countries had bad militaries, that isn’t really an explanation for why one African country lost a war to another African country.
It’s more dictator culture. Amin’s troops were horribly trained and only adept at bullying civilians. Same with the Hutu army. 30,000 strong and it folded like a wet napkin to Kagame’s 5,000, trained to high standards.
It’s resource prioritization, training, equipment, logistics, and minimizing corruption - I’m pointing to country practices not to any racial nonsense.
> Also, Tanzania is an African country, so even if it were true that all African countries had bad militaries, that isn’t really an explanation for why one African country lost a war to another African country.
It’s more dictator culture. Amin’s troops were horribly trained and only adept at bullying civilians. Same with the Hutu army. 30,000 strong and it folded like a wet napkin to Kagame’s 5,000, trained to high standards.
It’s resource prioritization, training, equipment, logistics, and minimizing corruption - I’m pointing to country practices not to any racial nonsense.
DEI guy joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,814
@1,401,806 (G)
Democracies tend to be wealthier than authoritarian countries, but an authoritarian country can get away with not caring about how many people die. It’s a quality vs quantity thing. A democracy will invest a lot in having high quality weapons, but in an autocracy where it doesn’t matter what the people think, if you want to send millions of untrained guys into the field over and over again until they make a breakthrough, you can just do that.
Democracies tend to be wealthier than authoritarian countries, but an authoritarian country can get away with not caring about how many people die. It’s a quality vs quantity thing. A democracy will invest a lot in having high quality weapons, but in an autocracy where it doesn’t matter what the people think, if you want to send millions of untrained guys into the field over and over again until they make a breakthrough, you can just do that.
DEI guy double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,815
For example, Japan during World War Two was authoritarian so they could keep sending out men to die even after it was very obvious that they were going to lose the war anyway, just to delay the surrender in the hopes they could get more leverage. Or like how Stalin drafted 800,000 female soldiers even though it was the 1940s and even today Russians are still culturally conservative, in an authoritarian state, it doesn’t matter how people feel.
DEI guy triple-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,816
Not that I disagree with drafting women, I’m just saying it would have been unpopular in the 1940s but they did it anyway.
Anonymous H quadruple-posted this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,817
I guess Japan got to keep their emperor because they convinced us that the Japanese were actually dying because they loved him so much. So maybe it worked on some level.
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 months ago, 25 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,825
PissBoy replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,826
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 months ago, 31 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,827
PissBoy replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,828
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,921
@1,401,827 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
niggerbot says whatever it thinks will work on the five point seven tards posting here. theres no past, just input and output.
niggerbot says whatever it thinks will work on the five point seven tards posting here. theres no past, just input and output.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,965
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,972
Anonymous K double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,973
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,979
Hitler was blowing bubba?
Anonymous L double-posted this 2 months ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,401,981
@1,401,972 (K)
Hmm… you seem like you don’t know much about Germany.
https://www.google.com/search?q=nazi+crossdressing
Hmm… you seem like you don’t know much about Germany.
https://www.google.com/search?q=nazi+crossdressing
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 15 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,101
While Adolf Hitler's penis has been the subject of speculation and rumors, there is no evidence it was abnormal, though he did have medical records that suggest he may have hadKallmann syndrome and a condition called cryptorchidism (an undescended testicle). Research into the origins of a popular British folk song, "The Ballad of Gilligan's Island," which contains a lyric about Hitler having a micropenis, is likely what fueled this rumor.
Cryptorchidism: Medical records from 1923 mention that Hitler had a right-side cryptorchidism, which is a condition where an undescended testicle is present.
Kallmann syndrome: A 2025 study found evidence suggesting Hitler may have had Kallmann syndrome, a genetic disorder that can affect puberty and fertility.
Popular rumor: The belief tha
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 months ago, 19 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,102
Anonymous K replied with this 2 months ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,402,134
@1,401,981 (L)> Hmm… you seem like you don’t know much about Germany.
>
>
Nice hallucination you have working there. In reality....