Minichan

Topic: We are now ruled by a president who was the least popular in history.

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 months ago #130,595

At least 49.9% of voters (allegedly) decided to give him a second chance. What could go wrong?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,400,446

Probably not a wise idea for the Dems to put a cackling imbecile up against him.

boof joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,448

yeah, one cackle and you're the "cackling imbecile"

but several rapes, and your just some guy

Anonymous B replied with this 2 months ago, 13 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,450

No, one years-long history of being a vacuous retard who evades every single remotely tough question by cackling like a moron and you're the "cackling imbecile".

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 9 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,451

Breaking his own records.

boof replied with this 2 months ago, 13 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,455

@1,400,450 (B)
oh?

Anonymous B replied with this 2 months ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,460

k?

Anonymous D replied with this 2 months ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,461

Approval currently circling the toilet drain.

https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker

Anonymous D double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,462

I wonder if it’s ever gonna hit 60% disapproval.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,483

@1,400,448 (boof)
In a civil country you don't treat someone like a criminal until they've been duly convicted of the crime.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,484

@previous (E)
He was found guilty of rape though…

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,485

@previous (F)
No, he was never convicted for rape.

He was "found liable" in a civil case. You dont even need a unanimous vote in a jury, no burden of proof. A panel decided he owed her money, he wasn't "found guilty".

Anonymous F replied with this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,486

@previous (E)
Such a great justice system we have isn’t it? If he was brown you’d be complaining they didn’t give him a harsher punishment.

Anonymous F double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,488

If the exact same thing happened with Obama, the right would never shut up about how Obama is a rapist. It’s all double standards.

Anonymous F triple-posted this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,489

There’s a reason why all the republicans voted against releasing the Epstein files and all the democrats voted in favor of releasing it.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,490

@1,400,486 (F)

> Such a great justice system we have isn’t it?

Glad we could be clear that one side believes in due process, and one doesn't.

> If he was brown you’d be complaining they didn’t give him a harsher punishment.
Making up scenarios in your head and blaming me.

Anonymous E double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,491

@1,400,489 (F)
He was a socialite who knew everyone, showing a list of people he met with tells us nothing.

Any nonprofit rep that scheduled a sit-down to ask for money would be on it, any random celebrity who shook his hand at a party, a plus one who came with a spouse to a summer dinner where most of the guests had no idea.

One party knows its meaningless, and the other is willing to throw innocents in the bin to stop the only man who challenged the deep state.

(Edited 55 seconds later.)

Anonymous F replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,493

@previous (E)

> One party knows its meaningless, and the other is willing to throw innocents in the drain to stop the only man who challenged the deep state.

It’s impressive how much brainrot you have that you’ve actually deluded yourself into thinking that Trump is doing the honorable thing by not releasing the Epstein files. Didn’t you see what Elon Musk said?

Anonymous F double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,494

I swear, it pisses me off how right wing white guys always say blacks have low IQs and aren’t qualified to do anything, shouldn’t be in college, blame every aviation accident on us even when the pilots are white, and then you people are the most foolish brain dead idiots in the world. You people could fall for freaking anything.

Anonymous F triple-posted this 2 months ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,495

The whole world is against the "only man" who can stop some mysterious group of people who are secretly controlling the world… that screams "I’m in a cult and I believe in crazy shit."

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,496

@1,400,493 (F)
Musk was mad at the generous spending bill, and missing out on his liberal electric car credits.

If it was so bad, and incriminated Trump, why didn't Biden and the democrats release it before Trump took over for his second term? 🤔

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,497

@previous (E)
Donald Trump campaigned on releasing it. The most charitable interpretation is he’s a liar.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,498

@1,400,494 (F)

> say blacks have low IQs

Are you the one who thought all the white teachers rigged the NLSY to make it appear that way? lol. that is conspiratorial

> and aren’t qualified to do anything, shouldn’t be in college

The right-wing view is that race shouldn't be taken into account. The left wing view is that it should.

You'd deny that, but if a bill to make college/corporate hirings race blind it would be the DEI lefties who would get mad.

> you people are the most foolish brain dead idiots in the world. You people could fall for freaking anything.

Wow, then you blacks should take over the #1 spot for once, and show us how its done.

If those IQ tests are rigged, then you can demonstrate your intellectual ability by becoming the most advanced society and leading benevolently.

Anonymous E double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,499

@1,400,497 (G)
Who cares? You don't need to be perfect when there's two options, you just need to be better than the alternative.

Most Americans decided Harris would run this country into ground.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,500

@1,400,498 (E)
That’s an incredibly childish way to look at the world. It’s like you think that luck doesn’t exist.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 54 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,501

@previous (G)
How does luck repeatedly give white kids higher scores on IQ tests?

Anonymous G replied with this 2 months ago, 57 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,502

@previous (E)
The IQ of Americans has increased over time.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,503

@previous (G)
Is that your factoid to avoid the question?

What luck is there in whites scoring better than blacks on IQ tests?

Luck is one test taker making a good guess, not a consistent pattern of whites outperforming blacks.

(Edited 42 seconds later.)

Anonymous G replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,504

The biggest predictor of how much money you’ll make in your lifetime is how much money your parents made.

I don’t think that you understand that your intelligence is a product of your environment. Black Americans and white Americans don’t live in the same environment. Even though segregation doesn’t exist anymore, black neighborhoods and white neighborhoods still exist and black neighborhoods are more likely to have underfunded schools and are more likely to have a higher exposure to lead.

Real life isn’t simple, you want this simple easy explanation that IQ is an objective measure of intelligence (it’s not) and that IQ can only be caused by one thing (it’s not).

Anonymous G double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,505

Black Americans are also more likely to live in areas with higher pollution because when it was legal to discriminate based on race when selling homes to people homes near industrial areas were designated for black families and areas further away from highways and factories were designated for white families.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 10 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,506

@1,400,504 (G)

> The biggest predictor of how much money you’ll make in your lifetime is how much money your parents made.

The NLSY showed that IQ was a better predictor than family income.

> I don’t think that you understand that your intelligence is a product of your environment. Black Americans and white Americans don’t live in the same environment. Even though segregation doesn’t exist anymore, black neighborhoods and white neighborhoods still exist and black neighborhoods are more likely to have underfunded schools and are more likely to have a higher exposure to lead.

That's an explanation for why blacks have low IQ, not a refutation that their IQ is low.

> Real life isn’t simple, you want this simple easy explanation that IQ is an objective measure of intelligence (it’s not) and that IQ can only be caused by one thing (it’s not).

IQ is an objective measure.

I never said it must be caused by one thing (thats a strawman).

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

Anonymous G replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,507

@previous (E)
It is a refutation for your Nazi biological determinist argument that blacks are unsuccessful because they’re biologically inferior to whites instead of because of a history of systematic oppression against blacks.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,508

@previous (G)
You should decide which you like more: calling whites inferior, or explaining why blacks fail all the time.

Doing both is a tad ironic, monsieur negro.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,509

@previous (E)
You’re a white supremacist. I never said that white people are inferior and I never said that blacks fail all the time.

Anonymous G double-posted this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,510

If your entire worldview is based around a belief in a racial hierarchy where you should have power over me for the way I was born, how can I coexist with you exactly? It seems like it’s you or I. And I like me a hell of a lot more than I like you.

Anonymous G triple-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,511

Whatever you are, you’re not a Christian.

Anonymous G quadruple-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,513

Because how could you be a Christian? Christians believe we were created in the image of God. How could you hate God’s image and be a Christian? The constitution says all men are created equal. You can’t be an American. If you’re not a Christian and you’re not an American, then what the hell are you? An enemy of both.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,514

@1,400,494 (F)

> I swear, it pisses me off how right wing white guys always say blacks have low IQs and aren’t qualified to do anything, shouldn’t be in college, blame every aviation accident on us even when the pilots are white, and then you people are the most foolish brain dead idiots in the world. You people could fall for freaking anything.

Yes, we should be in awe of superior white guys who are legacies and owe their wealth and station in life to what they inherited. They are mediocre otherwise.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,517

@previous (H)
Tbh I just hate this two faced shit they pull where they blame blacks for not being successful then actively say we don’t deserve to be successful and try to stop us. They’re so obviously just doing it because they’re evil. There are no facts, there’s no forbidden knowledge, it’s just psychopathic cowards who never got hit hard enough

Anonymous G double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,518

If I could hit them hard enough, I’d send them through a concrete wall.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 23 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,525

@1,400,514 (H)
Would you support a race-blind testing process for colleges and corporate jobs?

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,677

@1,400,446 (B)
"cackling idiot" literally describes the entire party, thanks.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.