Topic: Socialism with manhattan characteristic
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 months ago #130,569 Discuss.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 months ago , 22 minutes later[^] [v] #1,400,321 Socializing the 1% profit margins of grocery stores, discuss.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 months ago , 5 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,322 @previous (B)
Grocery stores don’t produce anything.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 months ago , 38 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,323 Here’s my idea: we use the military as a replacement for Instacart.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 months ago , 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,325 @1,400,322 (A)
Then we can finally socialize them and take back those 1% profits for the people!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 months ago , 2 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,327 @previous (B)
Tbh with industrial farming, we don’t need as many people living in the country. It would be better for the environment and the economy if we forced half the farmers off their land and made them move into cities.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 months ago , 20 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,328 That would also make it easier to distribute food to people, you wouldn’t need so many rural Walmarts.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 2 months ago , 37 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,329 I mean, the most common crop farmers grow is corn, and it’s subsidized by the federal government. That’s not efficient.
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 2 months ago , 2 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,330 There’s actually an argument to be made that farmers would make more money if they produced less food.
↕