Minichan

Topic: UK to ban porn that shows women being choked or strangled.

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 months ago #130,511

"Conservative peer Baroness Bertin warned earlier this year that there has been a "total absence of government scrutiny" of the pornography industry.

Her independent review, published in February, cited an account of a 14-year-old boy asking a teacher how to choke girls during sex"

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyk3qzq7k7o
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
3 43%
4 57%

Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,399,994

> Her independent review, published in February, cited an account of a 14-year-old boy asking a teacher how to choke girls during sex"
This is one of those things that I really shouldn't laugh at, but do anyway. What a dumb kid.

boof joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 24 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,399,998

now how the hell did this bitch acquire this account and from where? and then use it to justify controlling what adults can look at

chainsaw murders still fine for her, but fictional fuck chokes, oh heavens

Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 2 months ago, 9 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,000

@previous (boof)
I don't think those are really the same thing. Nobody who isn't already a violent psycho would ever actually imitate a chainsaw murder, but a lot of young people do get access to porn and it can in turn influence what they think is normal in sex or encourage them to do things they wouldn't have otherwise.

I'm a little on the fence about this ban, though. Adults should generally have freedom of media and all that, and I'm sceptical how much porn can really be regulated. But I can't help but sympathise with the basic idea behind it a little bit.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 10 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,001

@1,399,994 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)

> > Her independent review, published in February, cited an account of a 14-year-old boy asking a teacher how to choke girls during sex"
> This is one of those things that I really shouldn't laugh at, but do anyway. What a dumb kid.

Chances are it never happened. A convenient and invented anecdote to set off a moral panic.

I remember discussing sex. I told my sons that porn would set false expectations unless they became a hedge fund manager or a drummer in a rock band.

Anonymous D double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,003

@1,400,000 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)

> I don't think those are really the same thing. Nobody who isn't already a violent psycho would ever actually imitate a chainsaw murder, but a lot of young people do get access to porn and it can in turn influence what they think is normal in sex or encourage them to do things they wouldn't have otherwise.
>
> I'm a little on the fence about this ban, though. Adults should generally have freedom of media and all that, and I'm sceptical how much porn can really be regulated. But I can't help but sympathise with the basic idea behind it a little bit.

A VPN negates all age verification bullshit. This is moral panic stuff. Most people can read an espionage book without killing someone, enjoy a video game without indulging in a subsequent spree shooting, or wank it to porn without becoming a drooling rapist.

Those predisposed to these inclinations will find succor in any content. Pre-Internet a local man was arrested for taking Polaroids of sunbathing teens and taking more through a gym locker room window. Nobody clamored to ban Polaroid cameras.

A blackity black man joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 7 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,008

I know that white people think blacks are stupid, but I’m smart enough to know that I’m not gonna be the one defending men jerking off to women getting choked. Nope!

Anonymous D replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,010

@previous (A blackity black man)

> I know that white people think blacks are stupid, but I’m smart enough to know that I’m not gonna be the one defending men jerking off to women getting choked. Nope!

I don’t watch that shit. It’s like all of the porn ruined by Max Hardcore and friends who put women’s heads in toilets. These are genres for extreme misogynists and deeply closeted self-loathing gays.

A blackity black man replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,011

@previous (D)
I’m not the most conservative person in the world, but we all have to pick our battles and I’m just gonna say, protesting not being able to jerk off to BDSM ain’t it.

A blackity black man double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,013

Like if they ban porn, you really gonna do this? You’re really gonna just be out with that and let everybody know you’re a freak?


…are you sure about that? 🤨

https://youtu.be/Mk2l_1yd130

boof replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,014

@1,400,011 (A blackity black man)
first they came for the BDSM content....

.... but there was no one left to defend me for the getting-peed-on porn

A blackity black man replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,015

@previous (boof)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,016

@1,400,003 (D)
yeah but unfortunately these are the idiots running the place sadly. Imagine some rando moralfag dictating my life just cause I want to goon in peace after a long day of being a wage slave. I hate humans.

A blackity black man replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,017

Tbh I’m completely fine with the government regulating the internet, it’s a net negative to society.

boof replied with this 2 months ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,018

@previous (A blackity black man)
regulation yes, but for ensuring privacy rights and anti-monopoly measures

I support making ISP contracts only for adults, like alcohol sales. why does a fucking kid need an adult-content device? why don't they made kid-content ISP contracts if those god damn kids need them so much

A blackity black man replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,019

@previous (boof)

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

A blackity black man double-posted this 2 months ago, 44 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,020

You know what? It’s probably better to keep my opinions to myself.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 47 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,025

@1,400,000 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
It's a slippery slope to banning hairless twinks in the marble arts.

Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,026

@previous (G)
Look, you, ancient Greece and Rome did not just make statues of twinks, there are also statues of big, manly, muscular bears surviv-

Um. But nevermind that, what's more important is that they made statues of naked ladies! Yes, that's the stuff. Sorry, what were talking about?

Anonymous G replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,027

@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
Obscenity laws will keep encroaching, you'll be arrested for posessing androgynous busts. Decapitation, they will say, is an extreme form of choking and you won't be able to defend yourself in court because defending an accused pervert is hate speech.

You hate free speech, you didn't write to your MP about digital ID, and only good Anglicans go to heaven.

A blackity black man joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 34 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,034

@previous (G)
Libertarians are funny.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 35 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,043

@1,400,017 (A blackity black man)
🐵 opinion

A blackity black man joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,049

@previous (J)
You’re a great example of why the internet is a net negative for society.

Anonymous J replied with this 2 months ago, 19 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,052

@previous (A blackity black man)
🐵 opinion

A blackity black man replied with this 2 months ago, 58 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,053

@previous (J)
You know, I’ve never seen you say anything smart.

Anonymous J replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,054

@previous (A blackity black man)
> You know, I’ve never seen you say anything smart.
a self aware negro? such novelty!

A blackity black man replied with this 2 months ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,055

@previous (J)
If the only thing you can do is call people names, that’s a sign of low intelligence.

Anonymous J replied with this 2 months ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,056

@previous (A blackity black man)
> If the only thing you can do is call people names state objective faces, that’s a sign of low intelligence
lol
> is call people names
> implying blacks are people
lol

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,094

@1,400,027 (G)

> Obscenity laws will keep encroaching, you'll be arrested for posessing androgynous busts. Decapitation, they will say, is an extreme form of choking and you won't be able to defend yourself in court because defending an accused pervert is hate speech.
>
> You hate free speech, you didn't write to your MP about digital ID, and only good Anglicans go to heaven.

The church ladies and performative moralists want everyone to be as miserable as they are.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 23 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,107

It must apply to literature to actually work.

Green !!bO/s3MBcD joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 21 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,116

It's just a prelude to banning all online porn. Time to print Playboy magazines again!

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 42 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,117

@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
I’m a prayboy

Anonymous O double-posted this 2 months ago, 16 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,118

🙏🕊️

Anonymous J replied with this 2 months ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,400,159

> karen lawmakers ban exclusively karen goonmaterial
nature is healing.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.