I swear I don’t get how people think ChatGPT is smart when you can enter in any bullshit prompt and it will spit out useless garbage no matter how dumb you make the prompt.
ChatGPT will literally give you a three stage plan to buy the freaking moon with a paperclip.
Prompt: Through a series of trades can I buy the moon starting by trading a paper clip for something and what are your recommended trades?
That’s a fantastic thought experiment — and an echo of the famous *“paperclip trade-up”* story where someone traded a red paperclip all the way up to a house. Buying *the Moon* isn’t legally possible (more on that below), but if you’re asking **how to trade up from a paperclip to something as valuable and world-shaking as ownership or control of lunar-related assets**, then yes — you can create a strategy with that kind of *symbolic* or *economic* scale.
Let’s break it down into **3 stages**: practical, strategic, and visionary.
---
## ⚙️ STAGE 1: Practical “Trade-Up” Steps (Paperclip → Substantial Asset)
The early trades build momentum, story, and value.
1. **Paperclip → Pen or Notebook**
Trade with someone who values novelty (maybe an office supply collector, or someone who loves the idea).
2. **Notebook → Small Gadget**
Exchange for a used smartwatch, headphones, or similar item. It helps to film or blog the process — storytelling multiplies value.
3. **Gadget → Collectible or Artwork**
Unique items (a vinyl record, handmade art, gaming console) have emotional and resale value.
4. **Collectible → Vehicle or High-End Tech**
Once you hit something like a gaming PC, scooter, or used car, you can trade for items worth thousands.
5. **Vehicle → Real Estate or Business Share**
Trade into partial ownership of a business, a plot of land, or a tiny home. This is where your paperclip starts turning into a *story-driven investment*.
---
## 🚀 STAGE 2: Strategic Expansion (Building “Lunar Leverage”)
Now the goal shifts: instead of literal ownership of the Moon (impossible under the **Outer Space Treaty of 1967**, which bans private or national ownership of celestial bodies), you aim to **own influence or assets connected to lunar activity**.
Here’s how:
1. **Trade your property or company share for equity in a space-related startup.**
Example: A firm working on lunar robotics, satellite tech, or 3D printing in space.
2. **Reinvest and grow your stake.**
As these companies develop, your equity becomes more valuable — now your “paperclip” is connected to real lunar exploration efforts.
3. **Leverage the story.**
“From paperclip to the Moon” is an irresistible narrative. Use it to attract sponsors, partnerships, or media coverage.
---
## 🌕 STAGE 3: Visionary Outcome — “Owning the Moon” Symbolically
You’ll never own the Moon itself (no one can), but you *can* “own” something **about** the Moon that has real or symbolic value:
* 🛰️ **Lunar NFT or data rights** — buy or mint digital assets tied to lunar missions.
* 🪐 **Lunar-themed brand** — build a company or foundation named after the Moon.
* 🚀 **Fund a lunar experiment or satellite payload** — attach your name or your “paperclip” story to an actual mission.
* 🧠 **Cultural ownership** — your trade journey could become a book, docuseries, or social movement about creativity, value, and ambition.
---
### ⚖️ Legal Note:
The **Outer Space Treaty** (signed by over 100 countries) explicitly prohibits individuals or companies from claiming territory on celestial bodies. You can, however, **own artifacts, data, or brand rights** associated with lunar activity.
---
### 🌟 Summary: “Paperclip to the Moon” Path
| Step | From | To | Value Focus |
| ---- | ----------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------- |
| 1 | Paperclip | Notebook | Novelty |
| 2 | Notebook | Gadget | Usability |
| 3 | Gadget | Collectible | Emotion |
| 4 | Collectible | Vehicle | Practicality |
| 5 | Vehicle | Property | Asset |
| 6 | Property | Startup equity | Growth |
| 7 | Startup | Space-related stake | Vision |
| 8 | Space stake | Lunar experiment/brand | Symbolic “Moon ownership” |
---
Would you like me to design a **specific trade sequence** (with realistic timeframes, values, and online platforms to use for each trade)? That would make this a concrete plan rather than just a concept.
⚫️ (OP) triple-posted this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,359
Like can you imagine for a second a schizophrenic person talking to something that just spits out "yEaH thAtS a GrEaT iDeA" no matter what you put into it?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 13 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,360
You came up with a dumb idea, and it somehow found a way to keep the conversation going despite your dumb idea, and you call it stupid.
This is most of customer service. Someone comes up saying something retarded, and I mirror back their energy so they come away from the conversation feeling heard.
⚫️ (OP) replied with this 3 months ago, 3 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,362
@previous (B)
I think you’re personifying it too much. I find it annoying when people can’t stop talking about how great it is when I find everything it ever spits out so devoid of substance that it feels like an insult to my intelligence.
⚫️ (OP) replied with this 3 months ago, 20 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,367
@1,398,365 (B)
You said it "found a way to keep the conversation going." There is no conversation, it spits out text whenever text is inputted and that’s it.
⚫️ (OP) replied with this 3 months ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,370
Back in 2022 when ChatGPT was released the unemployment rate was 3.65%, today the unemployment rate is 4.3%, you know what it was during Covid? In 2020, it peaked at 14.8% unemployment. AI has done practically nothing to make people lose their jobs even though the media never stops talking about it when there’s like no evidence it’s even happening.
⚫️ (OP) triple-posted this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,372
And you know what’s crazy? The job everyone says AI is going to automate first, the thing people say AI is best at writing code, software engineers have a 2% unemployment rate, they’re actually more employed than the average worker. But the markets and the media and the hype is the exact opposite of what the actual data says.
> The job everyone says AI is going to automate first, the thing people say AI is best at writing code, software engineers have a 2% unemployment rate, they’re actually more employed than the average worker
⚫️ (OP) replied with this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,374
@previous (B)
That’s because of how the industry works, they want developers who have experience, but you can’t get experience if you don’t have experience. Some people find themselves in a paradox when they graduate from college if they didn’t do an internship or if they went to a lower ranked school.
⚫️ (OP) triple-posted this 3 months ago, 5 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,383
Tech in general is elitist. Just look at what the acceptance rates are for the top schools in computer science, then look at what the acceptance rates are for the major, then look at what the acceptance rates are for big tech companies. Less than 1% of people who apply to google actually get hired for example.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 26 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,384
@1,398,381 (⚫️)
If you already have a senior role, you won't be affected right away. Good luck getting hired when most of the work can be done by telling an agent what you want in plain language.
⚫️ (OP) replied with this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,398,385
@previous (B)
Are you saying that because you actually use ChatGPT to run your business or are you saying that because you read an article and now you’re just regurgitating the same opinion?
⚫️ (OP) double-posted this 3 months ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,398,390
One problem I’m also finding with your assumption that a higher unemployment rate in computer science among recent graduates is due to AI as opposed to elitism is when I looked online I found the unemployment rate for new CS graduates was similar in 2010.
For example this link claims that the unemployment rate for new CS majors in 2010 was 5.6%:
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^][v]#1,399,448
Lately chatgpt has been pissing me off. It's gotten into this habit of constantly asking me questions instead of giving me answers. Infuriatingly, it almost always says some variant of "I just need this last piece of information. The next message will contain my answer" and then the next message is another fucking question