Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: The Japanese

A black guy started this discussion 4 months ago #129,468

The Japanese are weird because they’re the most racist kind of Asian but also the kind of Asian the most types of Asians are racist against. They’re also the only non-whites to ever get nuked by white people which makes them the biggest victims ever, but then they also allied with Hitler which makes them the biggest villains ever.

On the one hand, the Japanese are more privileged than I am as a black man since whites like the Japanese more than they like me. On the other hand, black people never got nuked. The white South Africans built nukes, but black people still came out on top in the end. Nuclear weapons can defeat the Japanese, but apparently they can’t defeat the Zulus.

So are the Japanese privileged or oppressed?

(Edited 28 seconds later.)

Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
- 0%
- 0%
2 100%

A black guy (OP) double-posted this 4 months ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,393,029

It is very ironic that when white people went to war with Japan, they dropped two nukes instead of just one. But in South Africa, white people made six nukes, but then when the blacks started rising up, the white people chickened out and dismantled the nuclear bombs and gave up.

A black guy (OP) triple-posted this 4 months ago, 8 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,030

I guess they made the nuclear bombs because they were like "holy shit, were a tiny minority ruling over a much larger population because we have guns and they don’t as soon as these people get guns they’re all gonna kill us, we need a nuke." But they didn’t think about step 2 which is, you can’t really nuke your own country. So when it came down to it they were like, either we can blow ourselves up, we can let black people have these bombs, or we can take them apart and give the blacks the highly enriched uranium since uranium is an element and U235 has a 700 million year half-life so it turns out you can’t really get rid of it.

Meta joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,056

@1,393,029 (A black guy)
Why didn't the blacks just make their own nuclear weapons?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,059

@previous (Meta)
The answer to that is actually kind of interesting. The main barrier to acquiring nuclear weapons is obtaining uranium enriched to about 90% U-235. Natural uranium is mostly U-238 and U-235 and U-238 are chemically identical so the only way to separate them is through their mass difference which is what centrifuges exploit in order to enrich uranium. It is possible to create nuclear weapons with uranium that is not enriched to 90%, but the more enriched the uranium is, the smaller the critical mass needed to produce a nuclear weapon which makes it easier to transport and deliver to a target, etc. South Africa doesn’t really have any enemies, so they don’t need nuclear weapons since nuclear proliferation would draw negative attention to them. But they have consistently refused to give up their supply of highly enriched uranium despite signing a treaty that they agree to never produce nuclear weapons. Their strategy is basically, they don’t have nuclear weapons, but they always refuse to give up the ability to produce nuclear weapons if they ever need to, while using the excuse that they just keep the uranium for medical research.

Meta replied with this 4 months ago, 52 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,068

@previous (C)
Yes, Africa is famous for its utter lack of uranium and being generally barren in most natural resources. Apparently also no African country has been able to achieve American 1945 (or Soviet 1949) levels of nuclear industry since the white man left.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,069

@previous (Meta)
Ethiopia and Egypt are both building nuclear power plants.

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russia-ethiopia-sign-document-calling-construction-nuclear-plant-2025-09-25/

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/egypt

Anonymous D double-posted this 4 months ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,070

The reason why more developed countries tend to have more nuclear power plants than poorer countries is that nuclear power plants tend to be very expensive to build, and in poorer countries that usually isn’t worth it. However, countries that are poorer tend to have a habit of creating nuclear power plants that aren’t actually large enough to produce a significant amount of electricity as an excuse to enrich uranium in order to produce nuclear weapons.

Anonymous D triple-posted this 4 months ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,071

For example, that’s what Iran does.

Anonymous D quadruple-posted this 4 months ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,072

On the one hand, it’s stupid to ask why the poorest continent isn’t spending billions of dollars on building nuclear power plants. But on the other hand, it’s even more stupid to ask why the poorest continent isn’t spending billions of dollars on building nuclear power plants when the poorest continent is actually spending billions of dollars on building nuclear power plants. At least base your implied sarcastic racism on a premise that isn’t false. Literally just google stuff before you say it, it’s not hard.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,073

Bill Gates is also building a nuclear enrichment facility in South Africa for some reason.

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/gates-backed-reactor-company-asp-isotopes-plan-plant-make-nuclear-fuel-2024-10-30/

https://www.terrapower.com/terraPower-announces-strategic-agreement

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerraPower

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 3 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,393,577

@previous (E)
Time for Fallout: Fukushima
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.