Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#231,764
@231,753 (D)
none of those urls say anything about it being a botnet and one is just highlights from a week
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#231,766
@previous (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46) > can't even read a title
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^][v]#231,769
@previous (D)
Those links are just stupid.
The title in the first, which is what I assume you refer to, is two separate items. "Chrome and More Chrome", dealing with lots of Chrome news, and "That Pesky Botnet", referring to an actual botnet, as seen in item 2 in that list.
And the next one is just some dude's opinions on browsers.
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^][v]#231,770
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^][v]#231,795
@231,793 (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
I've posted more evidence than you ever will. If you want to continue discussing this, you'll at least have to provide your own references to back your misinformed side.
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#231,798
@previous (D)
im not the one making ridiculous claims without sources though
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#231,800
@previous (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
I've provided sources. Now it's your turn.
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#231,801
@previous (D)
no you didn't, you posted random articles with the word chrome in your title
lrn2burden of proof
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#231,803
@previous (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
beware the troll
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#231,804
@previous (Fox !FXYGNx1XR.)
no i wont sleep until he posts a source
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 double-posted this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#231,805
disclaimer
good night im going to bed
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#231,809
@231,801 (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
It's easy to be an armchair critic isn't it? I consider this a concession unless you can provide sources supporting your outlandish claims.
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#231,814
I have edited this posting to make the links work and removed that huge Youtube embed. I believe that Google are using Chrome to spy on users as the whole Google system is based on Data Mining. That is how they gain information about their users.
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 10 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#232,109
@previous (H)
it does, but most of it is opt-in or opt-out but that doesn't qualify as a botnet