Topic: RFK, JR. BANS Covid vaccines except in certain people
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 months ago #128,600
BANS them. This is fucking madness.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,386,554
They don't even work.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 10 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,555
@previous (B)
Oh? Which medical school did you graduate from again? I forgot. Oh, it was Harvard, right?
Oh? Which medical school did you graduate from again? I forgot. Oh, it was Harvard, right?
Meta joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 9 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,556
@previous (A)
Were Biden, Fauci, et al. lying or mistaken when they said "if you get vaccinated you will not catch this virus"?
Were Biden, Fauci, et al. lying or mistaken when they said "if you get vaccinated you will not catch this virus"?
Meta double-posted this 5 months ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,557
JUST TWO WEEKS SHOTS 😂😂😂
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,558
@1,386,556 (Meta)
No. You see, in science, conclusions change depending on the continued research. If you actually had a medical or science degree, you would know that.
No. You see, in science, conclusions change depending on the continued research. If you actually had a medical or science degree, you would know that.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 14 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,559
@previous (A)
> No. You see, in science, conclusions change depending on the continued research. If you actually had a medical or science degree, you would know that.
What continued research? NIH and CDC have been gutted by a Kennedy loser who believes in chemtrails and endorses every bit of granola hackery. He doesn’t even support measles vaccines. He’s in the “do your uninformed research” crowd.
> No. You see, in science, conclusions change depending on the continued research. If you actually had a medical or science degree, you would know that.
What continued research? NIH and CDC have been gutted by a Kennedy loser who believes in chemtrails and endorses every bit of granola hackery. He doesn’t even support measles vaccines. He’s in the “do your uninformed research” crowd.
Meta replied with this 5 months ago, 3 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,560
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,561
@previous (Meta)
I did. They drew the best conclusions they had with the date at the time. Again, if you had any college degree at all, you would have a small understanding of how science works.
I did. They drew the best conclusions they had with the date at the time. Again, if you had any college degree at all, you would have a small understanding of how science works.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 29 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,564
@previous (A)
Data was fucked up and Biden and Fauci should have kept their mouths shut until they had some facts. But nope. Then they just changed the definition of the word vaccine.
Data was fucked up and Biden and Fauci should have kept their mouths shut until they had some facts. But nope. Then they just changed the definition of the word vaccine.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,565
@previous (E)
Vaccines were never claimed to "literally stop all instance of the disease." What they do is train the immune system. Again, if you had any sort of medical or scientific training or education whatsoever, then you would not be such a living case of Dunning-Kruger.
Vaccines were never claimed to "literally stop all instance of the disease." What they do is train the immune system. Again, if you had any sort of medical or scientific training or education whatsoever, then you would not be such a living case of Dunning-Kruger.
Anonymous E replied with this 5 months ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,567
@previous (A)
Then Fauci shouldn't have told people that the covid vaccine would. And don't say he didn't say that because there are video clips all over the internet of him and Biden saying it. Then after all the people who took the shot started getting it they went and changed the definition of the word vaccine. And don't say they didn't do that, because there is proof of that too. Now keep blabbering on.
Then Fauci shouldn't have told people that the covid vaccine would. And don't say he didn't say that because there are video clips all over the internet of him and Biden saying it. Then after all the people who took the shot started getting it they went and changed the definition of the word vaccine. And don't say they didn't do that, because there is proof of that too. Now keep blabbering on.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,568
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 months ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,569
@1,386,567 (E)
No one "changed the definition of the word vaccine." It's been a standard definition for decades.
No one "changed the definition of the word vaccine." It's been a standard definition for decades.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,571
@1,386,556 (Meta)
> Were Biden, Fauci, et al. lying or mistaken when they said "if you get vaccinated you will not catch this virus"?
Yes they were. I heard Fauci say something similar. He should have said "people who get vaccinated will have better health outcomes than people who don't".
> Were Biden, Fauci, et al. lying or mistaken when they said "if you get vaccinated you will not catch this virus"?
Yes they were. I heard Fauci say something similar. He should have said "people who get vaccinated will have better health outcomes than people who don't".
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,572
Well you see, the vaccine did not eradicate the virus overnight and also suck all of our dicks to completion, so therefore it is entirely useless and should be disregarded entirely. See also gun safety laws
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,573
Anonymous E replied with this 5 months ago, 43 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,578
@1,386,569 (A)> No one "changed the definition of the word vaccine." It's been a standard definition for decades.
You're wrong of course. CDC and Merriam Webster both changed it in 2021 after Biden and Fauci both shot off their mouths.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,580
@previous (E)
https://historyofvaccines.org/blog/meaning-vaccine-same-it-was-1796-regardless-online-conspiracy-theories
https://historyofvaccines.org/blog/meaning-vaccine-same-it-was-1796-regardless-online-conspiracy-theories
Anonymous E replied with this 5 months ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,582
@previous (A)
No. You read those two definitions as that is what they were THEN and NOW and you tell me they have not been changed. Quit posting outdated conspiracy bs links. Just answer or stfu because you are wrong. The definition was CHANGED in 2021.
> No one "changed the definition of the word vaccine." It's been a standard definition for decades.
Check your Merriam-Webster dictionary.
No. You read those two definitions as that is what they were THEN and NOW and you tell me they have not been changed. Quit posting outdated conspiracy bs links. Just answer or stfu because you are wrong. The definition was CHANGED in 2021.
> No one "changed the definition of the word vaccine." It's been a standard definition for decades.
Check your Merriam-Webster dictionary.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,584
......
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,589
@1,386,582 (E)
Check your Dunning-Kruger. Merriam-Webster is not the "official" meaning of words. English, unlike French, has no official spellings or definitions. It's based on usage.
Check your Dunning-Kruger. Merriam-Webster is not the "official" meaning of words. English, unlike French, has no official spellings or definitions. It's based on usage.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 months ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,590
@1,386,582 (E)
It was not "changed". "Immunity" means and meant the same thing as "immune response" in MEDICAL SCIENCE. Again, you have no medical or scientific training whatsoever, so there is no way you know more than the consensus of the world's top experts. It's called the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
It was not "changed". "Immunity" means and meant the same thing as "immune response" in MEDICAL SCIENCE. Again, you have no medical or scientific training whatsoever, so there is no way you know more than the consensus of the world's top experts. It's called the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
Anonymous G replied with this 5 months ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,594
I remember the terrifying night when Joe Biden and George Soros broke into my house and scribbled in my dictionary, destroying the functionality of my vaccines in the process. Now I have measles
boof joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,596
this thread is a tard magnet
Anonymous B replied with this 5 months ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,600
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,602
@1,386,578 (E)
He'll never admit this even with the proof staring him right in the face. You must understand that you are talking to a radical liberal. Who is drunk and has on his Karen dress.
He'll never admit this even with the proof staring him right in the face. You must understand that you are talking to a radical liberal. Who is drunk and has on his Karen dress.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 55 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,604
How many booster does OP have?
boof replied with this 5 months ago, 4 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,630
@1,386,602 (J)
"radical liberal", that's like "tall dwarf"
"liberal" is one of the mildest fucking things going
"radical liberal", that's like "tall dwarf"
"liberal" is one of the mildest fucking things going
Anonymous F replied with this 5 months ago, 2 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,648
@previous (boof)
> "radical liberal", that's like "tall dwarf"
> "liberal" is one of the mildest fucking things going
I'm not American, apparently left wing is not the same as "liberal". So what's a liberal?
> "radical liberal", that's like "tall dwarf"
> "liberal" is one of the mildest fucking things going
I'm not American, apparently left wing is not the same as "liberal". So what's a liberal?
Meta replied with this 5 months ago, 52 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,651
Matt's gonna die now that he can't get his eighty-seventh booster against a cold virus 😂
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,653
Anonymous H replied with this 5 months ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,654
Meta replied with this 5 months ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,662
@1,386,653 (A)
What's the matter, buttercup? I thought you had already achieved "full vaccination" against the common cold virus??? 😂
What's the matter, buttercup? I thought you had already achieved "full vaccination" against the common cold virus??? 😂
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 10 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,663
Anonymous J replied with this 5 months ago, 7 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,664
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,665
How did a thread about RFKook become an argument about semantics? He’s unqualified and a threat to public health.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 months ago, 38 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,670
Anonymous B replied with this 5 months ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,677
Matt: expert on vaccines, sewer oil and eye candy.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 25 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,684
boof replied with this 5 months ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,740
@1,386,648 (F)
> > "radical liberal", that's like "tall dwarf"
> > "liberal" is one of the mildest fucking things going
>
> I'm not American, apparently left wing is not the same as "liberal". So what's a liberal?
an irrelevant creature of no consequence
> > "radical liberal", that's like "tall dwarf"
> > "liberal" is one of the mildest fucking things going
>
> I'm not American, apparently left wing is not the same as "liberal". So what's a liberal?
an irrelevant creature of no consequence
Anonymous H replied with this 5 months ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,796
@1,386,684 (N)
> > Im allowed to say whatever I want
>
> That’s the point of this place.
Unless you're Dave. He deletes what he doesn't like.
> > Im allowed to say whatever I want
>
> That’s the point of this place.
Unless you're Dave. He deletes what he doesn't like.
I am NOT "Matt"™ !aeNZeP7XP2 joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,808
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 21 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,387,047
@1,386,589 (A)
> Check your Dunning-Kruger. Merriam-Webster is not the "official" meaning of words. English, unlike French, has no official spellings or definitions. It's based on usage.
English has no official definitions or sprelings and it's all based upon usage, yet the definition of vaccine hasn't changed? How about the usage then? Has the usage of the American English word "vaccine" changed?
> Check your Dunning-Kruger. Merriam-Webster is not the "official" meaning of words. English, unlike French, has no official spellings or definitions. It's based on usage.
English has no official definitions or sprelings and it's all based upon usage, yet the definition of vaccine hasn't changed? How about the usage then? Has the usage of the American English word "vaccine" changed?
Anonymous P double-posted this 5 months ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,387,048
Vaccines, also known as "Clot-shots" are preparations that when injected, huffed nasally or applied as a topical ointment, cause your immune system to kill you and your family, and you can still get the disease that you were immunized against. Vaccines alone cannot stop the spread of deadly diseases.
It's all based upon usage, right? The definition changed.
It's all based upon usage, right? The definition changed.
boof replied with this 5 months ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,387,066
well, "woke" changed because of the deliberate efforts of a propagandist, aided by the general dislike of blacks
Meta replied with this 5 months ago, 42 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,387,076
“You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations”
Trust The Science™️!!!!! 😂👌
Trust The Science™️!!!!! 😂👌
boof replied with this 5 months ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,387,078
Meta replied with this 5 months ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,387,079
@previous (boof)
Dude you got sold a fraudulent vaccine that didn’t accomplish shit (and caused Long COVID also).
Phony Fauci lied to you. He is a terrible person and I’m sorry he misled you.
Dude you got sold a fraudulent vaccine that didn’t accomplish shit (and caused Long COVID also).
Phony Fauci lied to you. He is a terrible person and I’m sorry he misled you.