Minichan

Topic: What do you think of this belt, fora?

Anonymous A started this discussion 5 months ago #128,546

https://www.hamptonsmens.com/products/italian-suede-custom-belt-in-olive-w-orange-stitch

boof joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,386,112

our children are beaten with only the finest of belts

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 3 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,113

@previous (boof)
True, but what do you think of this belt specifically?

boof replied with this 5 months ago, 4 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,114

oh looks like it would feel nice when rubbing my fingers on it

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 7 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,115

@previous (boof)
*teehee*

Erik !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 41 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,125

@OP

Are you getting addicted to high end items? You know these things are marketed to poorer people who are more likely to spend their income on it to have a touch of luxury.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 2 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,128

@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
How are high-end fashion items marketed to the poor? The wealthy wear high fashion without branding, which I do. Also, I inherited millions, so I am enjoying it. I have a custom-tailored suit from Savile Row coming soon!

Erik !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 5 months ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,130

@previous (A)
Because they are more gullable to the marketing tricks they use and more likely to spend.

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,131

@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
So poor people buy luxury fashion and wealthy people buy low quality clothing? That doesn't seem correct.

Erik !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 5 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,132

@previous (A)
I didn't say that. I said these luxury items are more marketed to poorer people. I know this isn't shtick and you're genuinely thinking about ordering one which you shouldn't because you're not a millionaire.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,133

@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Ahh but I am a millionaire. But please explain. Let's say a rich man wanted a very nice, high-fashion belt. What would he do?

boof replied with this 5 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,134

consult with the local homosexual

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,135

@previous (boof)
lol

Erik !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 5 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,136

@1,386,133 (A)
> Let's say a rich man wanted a very nice, high-fashion belt. What would he do?

Im not playing that game.

You are not rich or a millionaire. You are hiding behind your shtick to justify buying an expensive belt. Do what the rest of us do and buy a quality belt for under £20 or £50 if you really want to push the boat out.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,137

@1,386,133 (A)

> Ahh but I am a millionaire.

You're an unemployed fantasist who is 51, almost 52.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,143

@1,386,133 (A)
> but I am a millionaire

You wish

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,162

It isnt cheap but it looks cheap. Just like those shoes you showed us before

Erik !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 5 months ago, 20 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,169

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
This pretty much.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,207

@1,386,162 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Why do you think it looks cheap?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 months ago, 24 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,208

@1,386,136 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
I inherited $2 million and have a great financial planner. There's no big mystery about it.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 months ago, 26 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,209

@1,386,207 (A)
I'm not sure

It feels like something that would be issued to a forest ranger

Erik !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 5 months ago, 16 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,211

@1,386,208 (A)
> There's no big mystery about it.

I think it is.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 months ago, 24 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,213

@1,386,209 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
lol

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 months ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,217

@1,386,209 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
So...forest ranger chic. Perfect.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 months ago, 13 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,218

@previous (A)
It looks like something that costs maximum $25 dollars to make, but the US Army bills the government $1000 a belt to acquire it

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 42 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,386,223

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
lol
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.