Topic: one of the shit states law enforcement, Oklahoma, in a tizzy over a 1985 Jackie Chan naked chicks in
boof started this discussion 11 months ago #128,330
a movie on a television set in the background of some bullshit online meeting. Groaw up fags.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgv8tw63vDU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgv8tw63vDU
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 months ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #1,384,025
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 months ago, 10 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,026
boof (OP) replied with this 11 months ago, 8 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,028
Gerald replied with this 11 months ago, 13 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,029
@previous (boof)
If a woman goes to a movie theater and a dick unexpectedly appears on screen during a full-frontal male nude scene, she cannot sue the movie or the theater. So you tell me why flashing is a crime.
If a woman goes to a movie theater and a dick unexpectedly appears on screen during a full-frontal male nude scene, she cannot sue the movie or the theater. So you tell me why flashing is a crime.
boof (OP) replied with this 11 months ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,033
well there's no prospect of getting raped by the screen image
Gerald replied with this 11 months ago, 40 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,037
@previous (boof)
Flashers aren't charged with attempted rape. You can't answer the question can you.
Flashers aren't charged with attempted rape. You can't answer the question can you.
boof (OP) replied with this 11 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,039
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 months ago, 21 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,040
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 11 months ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,043
@1,384,029 (Gerald)
Flashing is a crime because it forces someone to see sexual content without their consent in a real-life, threatening context, whereas a nude scene in a movie happens in a setting you’ve chosen and can expect based on ratings and content warnings.
Flashing is a crime because it forces someone to see sexual content without their consent in a real-life, threatening context, whereas a nude scene in a movie happens in a setting you’ve chosen and can expect based on ratings and content warnings.
Gerald replied with this 11 months ago, 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,044
See boof, that's how easy it was you sick fuck.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 11 months ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,081
@1,384,043 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
Also, movies warn you with the ratings system about what you may see on screen and sometimes fully list those things
Also, movies warn you with the ratings system about what you may see on screen and sometimes fully list those things
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 11 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,082
28 Years Later had so much zombie dong. It felt excessive
Gerald replied with this 11 months ago, 31 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,086
Meanwhile boof is walking around waving his dick about and saying "relax ladies, this is no different to a movie!" Hopefully this thread has set him straight.
boof (OP) replied with this 11 months ago, 5 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,384,115
@1,384,044 (Gerald)
why are you pretending to not know how to infer as if you have no powers of inductive reasoning
why are you pretending to not know how to infer as if you have no powers of inductive reasoning
