Minichan

Topic: Has anyone here watched one of Traci Lord's underaged pornographies?

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic started this discussion 15 years ago #1,281

I've heard that most of the prints were destroyed, is this true?

The Continental !!+bfOgzYS+ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later[^] [v] #24,843

We had one circulating in high school, but that was long ago.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,854

Has anyone here ever seen one of her movies?

The Truth replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,856

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
Yes. We had one circulating in high school. It was called, "The Pleasuredome."

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,859

Are you looking for somebody to hook you up?

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,861

@24,856 (The Truth)
Do you know how old she was when it was filmed? Also, tell me about the content.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,865

@24,859 (C)
Well, that certainly wasn't my original intent.

The Truth replied with this 15 years ago, 5 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,866

@24,861 (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
She was 16. Basically, the plot was, she was some sort of "new star" who was recruited by some dirty pornographers, to enter the ultimate in pornography: the Pleasuredome. I think it was a play off of Mad Max III. Anyway, she finally enters it, they enter her, and that's it.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,868

Why?

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 42 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,871

@24,866 (The Truth)
Was it very obviously filmed in the 80's?

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #24,875

@24,868 (D)
I have no idaa why. The thought just popped into my head, and I figured it might make for interesting conversation.

AC !tyLmN8C16E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,029

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
It’s an interesting question, and you’ve managed to not make this a shitfest.

10/10

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,033

@previous (AC !tyLmN8C16E)
Also, barely anyone replied, so it was still a fail.

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,035

yes 1980s feel to it

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,039

@previous (B)
With big feathered hair and thick makeup? I love it.

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,040

@25,033 (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)

> Also, barely anyone replied, so it was still a fail.

I do not think many people would admit to watching child pornography....

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,043

@previous (D)
She wasn't a child.

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,045

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
She was a kid.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,046

@previous (D)
She was 16.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,047

@25,043 (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
You know what some people are like. If they're a day under 18 it's instantly DISGUSTING CHILD-RAPE PORN.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,048

toto, do you think pornography is a good or bad thing?

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,049

@25,043 (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)

It's still legally defined as such, though. She was under 18 except for one film. She later recanted her whole career and basically claimed it was all footage of her "being raped on film."

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,050

@25,047 (G)
I know, people are weird about sex.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,051

@25,048 (H)
It's a neutral thing. As long as something doesn't hurt anyone or negatively affect your daily life, it's fine.@25,049 (I)

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,053

@25,049 (I)
Yeah, it was basically rape. The producers made her take drugs. It's no different than kids trafficked for sex.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,054

@25,049 (I)
She sounds like a liar.

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,055

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
Yeah, discount the word of the person who was actually involved and substitute your own reality!

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,058

@previous (D)
She made some money and then regretted it.

Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,060

@25,055 (D)
Just because she claims she was 'raped', doesn't make it 'reality'. She could easily be lying.

Anonymous G double-posted this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,061

@25,058 (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
Exactly.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,064

@25,060 (G)
Linda Lovelace was probably lying as well.

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,066

@25,058 (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
She was hooked on drugs and raped on camera. She's stated that it was terrible.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #25,068

@previous (D)
Being hooked on drugs does not make it rape.

Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,087

@25,053 (D)

Horsefeathers. Apparently you can't see the angle of 'Oh, I want to be a serious actress now, so now I'll start claiming these things about my ugly past history in order to gain media attention and look like a victim in the process'. Many people quietly exit the adult entertainment industry with fair worse scenarios (like AIDS) than her and they don't try to use it as a cover story to get publicity.

jump !VIfloDyEYo joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,548

The porn industry does have a sleazy side. I'm sure she feels like she was raped now.

Only the people who were there can say differently. Does it look like she's heavily drugged to those who have seen it?

Jack !gOStA1p7Pc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,550

@OP
I'm not falling for this again, Hansen.

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,563

@25,029 (AC !tyLmN8C16E)
Some posters seem to radiate serenity which keeps people from getting mad.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,606

@24,866 (The Truth)
@24,856 (The Truth)

Funny how Truth rages like a faggot over lolicon, yet admits that he's watched actual child porn.

Fucking hypocrite.

psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,608

/r/ing links to said porn

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,618

@previous (psychopath !PSYCHOhc32)
do_your_own_research.mkv

@25,606 (L)
> hypocrite
That's the way people work.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,675

@25,606 (L)
That's Matt, posting as The Truth.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 44 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #25,692

@25,548 (jump !VIfloDyEYo)
There is a difference between being drugged and taking drugs.

Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #26,882

@25,675 (N)

Anybody on this board can type "The Truth" into a namefield. Provide IP addresses for comparison and I'll believe you.

Anonymous L double-posted this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #26,916

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Whatever. Just ban the whining little faggot already.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.