Topic: I will not tolerate people who harp on the age difference between Aisha and Muhammad.
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 months ago#127,969
You're saying this to someone who is English and likely has an ancestor in my family lineage who married a cousin or a sibling around the same age (6) who likely ended up dead or maimed.
Try harder, brah.
Also, interesting how nobody holds "The Brits" socially responsible yet they always point fingers to the brown people. Hmm, hmm, hmmmmmmm, what could it be?
Meta double-posted this 6 months ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,517
Also expressing outrage at a grown man marrying a six year old girl is not racist. I think you would have a hard time finding anyone, even in the KKK, who thinks child marriage is fine when white people do it.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,518
@previous (Meta)
Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Donald Trump, Stephen Hawking, and Jeffery Epstein would like a word with in the US Virgin Islands.
Anonymous E quadruple-posted this 6 months ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,524
Neo Nazis also have been known to commit sex crimes against children. Acting like racists, some of the most immoral people in society are somehow more upstanding when it comes to pedophilia is obviously stupid to anyone with a brain. Obviously a lot of Nazis are pedophiles.
Anonymous E triple-posted this 6 months ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,531
Like for real, bringing up the KKK, a terrorist organization that has killed thousands of people that set black people on fire acting like that’s a moral standard, go fuck yourself.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 months ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,600
@1,380,525 (F)
Most sources from a quick Google search suggest she was six, but I'm a little disappointed because that would've put those British kings on notice more for selecting wives younger.
T-34 triple-posted this 6 months ago, 5 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,637
There are some people who think the age of consent in Nigeria is 11, but it’s actually because somebody made it up on Twitter and it went viral and nobody fact checked it so it ended up at the top of the google search results for some number of years but it was never actually true though. The Japan 13 thing was true until they changed it though. Go figure.
> There are some people who think the age of consent in Nigeria is 11, but it’s actually because somebody made it up on Twitter and it went viral and nobody fact checked it so it ended up at the top of the google search results for some number of years but it was never actually true though. The Japan 13 thing was true until they changed it though. Go figure.
Why are you so interested in the very young being raped?
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 36 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,675
@1,380,669 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Go ahead and explain to me in as much detail as possible why you think marrying a 12 year old is less bad than marrying a 6 year old.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,686
@1,380,681 (T-34)
Yes. A female child closer to puberty is more equipped to survive the trauma of penetration and childbirth. Also the trauma of being ripped from their family. This is obvious
Im not defending anything, but your ego makes you carry on
> Men always want to blame other races as being the ones who are the actual predators. And it makes victims of their own race leas likely to get justice
> Yes. A female child closer to puberty is more equipped to survive the trauma of penetration and childbirth. Also the trauma of being ripped from their family. This is obvious > > Im not defending anything, but your ego makes you carry on
When you’re talking about a 12 year old this kinda makes you sound like a pedophile. Imagine if some woman was talking about a woman being married at 12 and a dude said that in response. 🤣
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,690
@previous (Anon)
No, I was showing why I didn’t answer your question. It was a leading question based on a false premise. I can’t answer it for the same reason you can’t answer the question "Why do you support Adolf Hitler?" It’s a stupid question and you’re a stupid person.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,694
@previous (T-34)
How am I lying when I've stated multiple times in this topic that child sexual abuse is rampant amongst every race, and men of every race point a finger at outsiders instead of looking in their own houses?
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,695
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Because you’re accusing me of supporting pedophilia because I said you’re wrong when you said that white people don’t rape 6 year olds. Then you said that men defend rape when it’s done by the same race as them. Except, I’m not Muslim, I’m not Arab, but you’re white and you seem really pressed about proving that white people raping children is less bad than Arabs raping children because at least when white people rape children they’re a little bit older. You’re a giant hypocrite.
FYI you cited an article that was published when segregation was still legal where this is in the first paragraph, "It involved two clans of the illiterate, pagan Izi (pronounced easy) tribe…"
I can’t imagine that this article was written by somebody with racist or religious prejudices at all. (Sarcasm)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,706
@1,380,704 (Anon)
Its definitely a huge problem there, but other areas may have higher rates than reported because of efforts from law enforcement and others to suppress this info
Anon replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,713
@1,380,709 (T-34)
Don't know why you insist on derailing the topic. Start a new topic on math or science. I think you are trying to avoid Kook and I from pointing the finger, at your need for child abuse.
T-34 double-posted this 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,722
Oh wait, you can’t because one of the very first things I said is that I’m not defending marrying 6 year olds and I only have a problem with hypocrites pretending that Europeans are superior and don’t rape children.
Anon replied with this 6 months ago, 9 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,727
@1,380,721 (T-34)
Looking at the sum total of your replies to Kook.
That is how I made the conclusion.
Also your lie re Hitler and then defending the lie as you did.
Brain Transplant. Now back to work and perhaps some net play at lunch.
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 21 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,731
And by the way, I’m not a physicist, but I know people who are, and I’ve taken physics courses. "I do calculus with physics" isn’t impressive. The second calculus course people take in high school usually is physics with calculus. Or if they don’t take it in high school, the introductory physics course in college that covers mechanics usually involves calculus. Acceleration is the derivative of velocity and velocity is the derivative of position.
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,733
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
If you’re lying to pretend you’re smart, in my view, that’s not very impressive. Especially if you think "calculus" is a "smart person word." People take calculus in high school. I did it when I was 16.
I'm still waiting, where are the people who say Edmund Tudor was a person of perfection, who was blessed in the eyes of God and lives in paradise forever?
> He must be Black enough for you to defend this nonsense
He was from Saudi Arabia. There was an Arab slave trade where Arabs enslaved black people from Africa. I’m not defending Muhammad or Arabs. I’m saying capitalizing on it as an opportunity to prove the superiority of white people is gross.
> I also NEVER said that white people dont rape 6 year old. But I have said many times that this issue happens amongst all races > > Yet he was quick to defend Africans. Suspicious
> Its definitely a huge problem there, but other areas may have higher rates than reported because of efforts from law enforcement and others to suppress this info
> I didnt say that whites dont rape 6 year olds > > And yes, in your haste to defend your race, you came across as supporting child rape > > You consider yourself African and scrambled to point the finger at others, which is typical of men of every race > > I do not blame any race more strongly for child rape than another
> How am I lying when I've stated multiple times in this topic that child sexual abuse is rampant amongst every race, and men of every race point a finger at outsiders instead of looking in their own houses?
> Yes. A female child closer to puberty is more equipped to survive the trauma of penetration and childbirth. Also the trauma of being ripped from their family. This is obvious > > Im not defending anything, but your ego makes you carry on
> Men always want to blame other races as being the ones who are the actual predators. And it makes victims of their own race leas likely to get justice
T-34 double-posted this 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,749
I’m just going to post all the contradictions I see in that:
1. You said you didn’t say that Europeans didn’t rape 6 year olds after you said that Europeans didn’t rape 6 year olds.
2. You said that only men will defend rapists just because the rapist is the same race as they are. Except you’re white, you’re not a man, and you said Europeans didn’t rape 6 year old.
3. You said you’re not defending rapists and I am defending rapists even though the first thing I said is I’m not defending rapists and you felt the need to argue that raping a 12 year old isn’t as bad as raping a 6 year old as if you think there’s any difference.
4. You assumed I was defending Muhammad because Muhammad was African even though Muhammad wasn’t African, I’m not Muslim, and the first thing I said is I’m not defending Muhammad.
T-34 triple-posted this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,750
5. You accused me of saying that I’m defending child predators even though I explicitly stated that I’m not defending it, and when I asked you to quote where I said that I support child predators, you said that I didn’t say it but you deduced it from everything that I wrote which essentially admitting that you’re making a straw man argument.
T-34 quadruple-posted this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,751
6. You (keep in mind now I’m talking about Anon as well), said that I’m making my argument because I’m racially motivated because "Muhammad must be African enough for you" even though I said that Muhammad wasn’t African, he was Arab, Arabs enslaved blacks from Africa, and you posted a link to an article from 1960 talking about "illiterate pagan tribes" in Nigeria eating people, like that doesn’t make you look way more racist than I am.
T-34 quintuple-posted this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,752
I could go on, but at this point I’m bored. The point is, both of you are fucking idiots who don’t know how to form a logical argument without lying and gaslighting and making hypocritical accusations. All your accusations you made against me are more accurate descriptions of your own behavior. And you know what? Maybe you have another little "clever" comeback accusing me of something I never said, but you know what? You’re still stupid and just because you lie to yourself that you’re smart doesn’t change anything about reality.
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 13 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,762
If your comeback is going to be "but I was talking about the British royals." Name one African English king and then you’ve proven you weren’t talking about white people.
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 55 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,768
@1,380,766 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Well, lucky for you I’m an American, so I don’t need to defend the British royal family. Defending the moral character of the British royal family is the dumbest thing ever. They’re just the descendants of the most violent family. And you’re a weirdo for caring about them so much.
T-34 triple-posted this 6 months ago, 49 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,772
Kook, you must think everyone is stupid, but I know which people you defend. I’m not stupid, I know what your motivation is. And I don’t like who you are because of it.
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 3 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,774
All I’ve ever said is Muhammad was a rapist and the British royals were rapists. And you’re mad at that because you don’t want me to say whites are equal to Arabs. It’s as clear as day to me.
T-34 double-posted this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,775
You’re exclusively getting mad about only what I say about white people and not getting mad about anything anybody says about people who aren’t white. It’s so obvious.
T-34 joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 10 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,786
I’m just gonna point out that you all accused me of supporting Muhammad because you think Muhammad is an African and of being a Trump supporter. Even though I’m a Christian.
T-34 triple-posted this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,789
And to think I’m defending Muhammad because he’s a "person of color." Think about what that means for a second, you’re saying I’m defending Muhammad because he’s not white and I’m not white, so that must make us similar somehow. But that would be like me accusing you of defending Asians because you’re white and Asians and whites aren’t black. It doesn’t makes sense.
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,791
Muslim also isn’t a race, Indonesia is a Muslim majority Asian nation, Russia is majority white, but 10% of Russians are Muslim, which works out to about 14 million people. There are Muslims in Africa, but there are also countries like the DRC that are almost completely Christian.
T-34 double-posted this 6 months ago, 54 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,792
@1,380,790 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I think you’re just a racist honestly. I never defended Muhammad. I just said that Europeans are hypocrites for pretending they don’t rape people. And you got mad at that. But I never once said Muhammad wasn’t a rapist. You won’t quit with the straw man.
T-34 joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,797
I’m Christian not Muslim, I’ve been a Christian my whole life, but I believe in freedom of religion, and all the Muslims I’ve met have been way more respectful to me than any of you have.
I saw Meta say that even someone in the KKK wouldn't say that raping children is okay earlier in this thread, but the subtext of that is to suggest that KKK members are bad people. So I wouldn't call that defending the KKK.
T-34 replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,380,805
@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
That is defending the KKK. He’s suggesting the moral character of a terrorist organization that killed people for being black (I’m black by the way) is better than that of Muslims. Can you not see how that might piss me off as a black person at least a teeny tiny bit, or are you just a complete psychopath?
> He’s suggesting the moral character of a terrorist organization that killed people for being black (I’m black by the way) is better than that of Muslims
I see how you could take it that way. But do you also see how he may have intended his message? Perhaps you could substitute the KKK for another group of people known for being quite evil.
T-34 joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,380,930
@1,380,915 (Q)
You know what? There is a reason why Stephen Hawking. But as chronically online as minichan is, I think going into detail about the Stephen Hawking conspiracy is just too terminally online even for this website.