Topic: My mom is a lying fucking cunt.
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 months ago #127,440
Every time I asked her for details concerning my father's business. It's always contradiction after contradiction or just a flat out lie that doesn't correlate with her story of getting beaten by her ex-husband.
When confronted with this, she gets defensive, and it pisses me off. I think she's keeping something from me like a fucking bitch.
When confronted with this, she gets defensive, and it pisses me off. I think she's keeping something from me like a fucking bitch.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 10 minutes later[^] [v] #1,376,651
No one cars.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 52 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,660
Could be white collar crime. Pretty common.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 12 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,777
Shockingly OP is not the Angry Asian Anon.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,787
Parents are allowed to keep secrets from their children, especially adult children and vice versa.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 33 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,792
Probably he was something embarrassing like a whore.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 months ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,793
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,795
cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 16 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,797
lol you fucking retard
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,798
Why do you need to know?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 7 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,800
OP might have a point - I'm generally an open book so I don't get it either. I can't keep up with what family doesn't talk to who at this point and it stung a little when I found out I was kept out of the loop on some stuff.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,801
@OP> Every time I asked her for details concerning my father's business. It's always contradiction after contradiction or just a flat out lie that doesn't correlate with her story of getting beaten by her ex-husband.
>
> When confronted with this, she gets defensive, and it pisses me off. I think she's keeping something from me like a fucking bitch.
It is NONE of your beeswax. Privacy is what it is.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 months ago, 20 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,809
@OP
Please explain further.
Please explain further.
boof joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,817
is the business waste management
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 3 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,852
Observational Analysis
1. Emotional Dysregulation
The language and tone of the message suggest a pronounced difficulty with emotional regulation. This is not uncommon in individuals on the autism spectrum, particularly when confronted with perceived inconsistencies or ambiguity in interpersonal communication. Vulgarity and aggressive phrasing may function as unfiltered emotional output rather than a calculated attempt to offend.
2. Cognitive Rigidity and Demand for Consistency
The reaction to perceived contradictions appears to stem from a cognitive style that prioritizes logical coherence and factual alignment. When confronted with narrative inconsistencies, the subject may default to an interpretation of deceit or concealment, rather than consider psychological factors such as trauma or memory fragmentation in the other party.
3. Direct Communication Style
The message is expressed in a highly literal and unrestrained manner. Such communication may be indicative of a reduced tendency to engage in social masking or the modulation of tone to align with neurotypical expectations. The individual does not appear to filter or temper emotional content, which may reflect a communication preference grounded in directness over diplomacy.
Perspective-Taking Capacity
Despite the emotionally charged content, the subject demonstrates a basic awareness that another person may be acting with intent or motive. While this may suggest a functional, if emotionally dysregulated, theory of mind, the inferred motives are framed in hostile or accusatory terms. This may indicate a tendency toward misattribution of intent under stress.
Cognitive Engagement and Reasoning
The individual is clearly engaged in pattern recognition and comparative reasoning, evaluating statements for internal consistency. There is evidence of motive analysis and hypothesis testing, albeit filtered through an emotionally volatile lens. From a cognitive standpoint, this reflects intact, if emotionally compromised, executive functioning.
Contextual Considerations
If the mother referenced in the message has experienced trauma, inconsistencies in her recounting may be a consequence of psychological defense mechanisms rather than conscious deception. The subject's failure to account for this possibility may reflect either a lack of awareness or a limited capacity for trauma-informed interpretation.
Conclusion
The communication does not suggest a lack of intelligence or self-other differentiation. Rather, it reflects a combination of emotional dysregulation, cognitive rigidity, and direct communication style often associated with autism spectrum presentations. The hostile tone likely arises from internal distress and a failure to reconcile interpersonal ambiguity with a preference for logical coherence.
1. Emotional Dysregulation
The language and tone of the message suggest a pronounced difficulty with emotional regulation. This is not uncommon in individuals on the autism spectrum, particularly when confronted with perceived inconsistencies or ambiguity in interpersonal communication. Vulgarity and aggressive phrasing may function as unfiltered emotional output rather than a calculated attempt to offend.
2. Cognitive Rigidity and Demand for Consistency
The reaction to perceived contradictions appears to stem from a cognitive style that prioritizes logical coherence and factual alignment. When confronted with narrative inconsistencies, the subject may default to an interpretation of deceit or concealment, rather than consider psychological factors such as trauma or memory fragmentation in the other party.
3. Direct Communication Style
The message is expressed in a highly literal and unrestrained manner. Such communication may be indicative of a reduced tendency to engage in social masking or the modulation of tone to align with neurotypical expectations. The individual does not appear to filter or temper emotional content, which may reflect a communication preference grounded in directness over diplomacy.
Perspective-Taking Capacity
Despite the emotionally charged content, the subject demonstrates a basic awareness that another person may be acting with intent or motive. While this may suggest a functional, if emotionally dysregulated, theory of mind, the inferred motives are framed in hostile or accusatory terms. This may indicate a tendency toward misattribution of intent under stress.
Cognitive Engagement and Reasoning
The individual is clearly engaged in pattern recognition and comparative reasoning, evaluating statements for internal consistency. There is evidence of motive analysis and hypothesis testing, albeit filtered through an emotionally volatile lens. From a cognitive standpoint, this reflects intact, if emotionally compromised, executive functioning.
Contextual Considerations
If the mother referenced in the message has experienced trauma, inconsistencies in her recounting may be a consequence of psychological defense mechanisms rather than conscious deception. The subject's failure to account for this possibility may reflect either a lack of awareness or a limited capacity for trauma-informed interpretation.
Conclusion
The communication does not suggest a lack of intelligence or self-other differentiation. Rather, it reflects a combination of emotional dysregulation, cognitive rigidity, and direct communication style often associated with autism spectrum presentations. The hostile tone likely arises from internal distress and a failure to reconcile interpersonal ambiguity with a preference for logical coherence.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,863
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,377,128
You can contact whoever was in charge of will/probate/whatever I assume