Minichan

Topic: CPT: Colored People Time

Anonymous A started this discussion 6 months ago #127,414

Discuss.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #1,376,343

TBH the term "colored" has so many meanings in different countries, I feel like the term is meaningless. Originally, in the United States, it meant black people, so it developed negative, although not necessarily as out right offensive connotations as the n word due to its association with signs during segregation that would say "coloreds only." But now, it’s used by politically correct people as a polite way to say "non white people" by saying "people of color" which can apply to all non-white Europeans including East Asians who have white skin. Then in South Africa, it doesn’t refer to fully black people, it only refers to people who are half white and half black and nobody else. It’s also a little but dumb if you think about it since from a scientific perspective black isn’t a color, it’s the absence of color, so technically white people have color and black people don’t so the term doesn’t really make sense. Unless you mean the presence of melanin in which case blacks have more of it than whites. But melanin isn’t really "color."

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 months ago, 38 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,344

Black people tend to be late.

Anonymous B replied with this 6 months ago, 20 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,345

So basically, colored can mean anything except white people, or it can mean white people if you’re a know-it-all Reddit atheist Mensa member sort of guy who likes saying, "Um, actually."

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,359

I don't know if it was but the term colored feels multicultural.
What about other terms like spook, coon, or darky. How did those terms come about?
Were they ever just valuations? I've heard livestock refered to as change.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,363

Well, i mean it is pretty well known that niggers are unable to perceive abstract concepts such as time. Thanks to their primitive brains that are only capable of supporting an average of three hundred words, they live in an a state of eternal present, much like a dog.
They do not have an understanding of the past(explaining why they so feverishly hold onto "muh slavery" despite it being something every other ethnic group has experienced and moved on from) or future. Actual pureblooded africans dont even seem to have a concept for being inbetween two states(such as being midway up a tree)

SakawaBoyGenius joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,366

@previous (D)
You literally just spelled a one letter word wrong and you’re talking about intelligence?

Anonymous D replied with this 6 months ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,368

@previous (SakawaBoyGenius)
The implications your making is rather hilarious coming from a gay.

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,371

I’m just going to point out that most African Americans are from west Africa and west African languages are tonal. Since tonal languages have more sounds than non-tonal languages, tonal languages usually have fewer homophones. So a speaker of a west African language would actually have to remember more words since they don’t have as many words that sound the same but have different meanings. And actually if you look at how many words west African languages have vs English, the difference isn’t really that large. For example, English is estimated to have between 170,000 and 1 million words (there are different ways to count, for example, are run and running two words or two versions of the same word). Yoruba has about 450,000 words. So they’re actually on the same order of magnitude in terms of vocabulary. (Which should be obvious if you’re not an idiot).

Anonymous D replied with this 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,373

@previous (SakawaBoyGenius)
So like beasts? GG

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 32 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,374

European languages also don’t have tone, so in a way west African languages are more complex, since they distinguish between sounds European languages don’t distinguish between. Before colonization, sub Saharan Africans also did have writing systems. The Igbo people in Nigeria for instance wrote using Nsibidi, which is a writing system where every word had its own character similar to Chinese (which also coincidentally is a country that has tonal languages). The memorization of a different symbol for every word is more complex than memorizing an alphabet with a fixed number of symbols.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nsibidi

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,375

> west African languages are more complex,

Faggots not complex, just terrible awful results.

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,376

@previous (F)
You don’t sound very smart.

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,377

So anyway, im about to get to work at the local honky tonk, tonight is my turn to be the main event, meaning im getting railed notstop by drunkards right in the middle of the main room, well into the night. If anybody uses my name for the next twelve hours assume their impersonators.

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,379

@previous (SakawaBoyGenius)
You do realize that it’s incredibly easy to tell when you’re impersonating me because my grammar is so much better than yours, right? You can’t fake being smarter than you actually are.

Anonymous F replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,380

@1,376,376 (SakawaBoyGenius)
Smart enough to spot a cock sucking asshole reaming idiot.

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,381

Anyway, a belief in racism shows that you’re not smart. Because hypothetically, let’s imagine a world where Africans actually were less intelligent than white people on average. Just because I’m black and you’re white, that doesn’t mean you have the average IQ for a white man and I have an average IQ for a black man. I can still be smarter than you. The mean average wealth or intelligence of a group says nothing about you as an individual because you’re a sample size of one. Even if it were true that blacks were low IQ (which is false by the way), I’m still smarter than you are so it doesn’t matter.

SakawaBoyGenius double-posted this 6 months ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,382

It’s the same fallacy of living vicariously through the wealthy and powerful. Yeah if you’re a white supremacist you might feel good about yourself because the British empire was the largest empire, and white majority countries have so much wealth and so much power. You might look at Elon Musk and think, "Wow, white people are so smart." Bro, none of that’s you. You don’t control anything. You’re not rich. You’re just a pawn in somebody else’s game. Maybe you’re one of the white chess pieces, and maybe you’re winning against the black chess pieces. You’re still just a pawn. It doesn’t mean you’re going to make it until checkmate. You’ll be gone long before that happens.

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

SakawaBoyGenius triple-posted this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,383

…that and the British empire doesn’t exist anymore. It’s not popular to say it. But think about it: white people had the most powerful empires in the past, now those empires don’t exist. If you had more yesterday than you have today, are you really winning? Nobody in the world is honest about this, and I’m not going to say it.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,387

Apartheid South Africa
Rhodesia
Nazi Germany
The Confederate States of America
The British Empire
The Spanish Empire
The Portuguese Empire
The French Empire

White supremacist empires and nations have a nasty habit of going extinct for some reason. I wonder why. Is it because the Jews control the world? Wait a minute, but if whites are superior because they can control blacks but no wait a minute, Jews are evil because they can control whites, what if Jews are actually racially superior to white people and white people aren’t honest about it?

Anonymous D replied with this 6 months ago, 54 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,398

@previous (G)
nazi germany, the confederaracy, and the british/french/spanish empires are still mostly alive, thanks.

SakawaBoyGenius joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,402

@previous (D)
On what level?

If you walk from the Brandenburg gate to the victory column in Berlin, you’ll come across two pride flag crosswalks, Britain is less than 50% Christian, France is just fucking France I don’t even know what you’re on about there.

SakawaBoyGenius double-posted this 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,403

And then the Confederacy… if you mention Trump, he’s in Washington, he’s not in Richmond.

SakawaBoyGenius triple-posted this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,404

If anything he’s making the federal government more powerful which is what the north was fighting for.

SakawaBoyGenius quadruple-posted this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,406

…and then he’s from New York now that I think about it.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,407

@1,376,387 (G)
Why did your narcissistic ass have to turn this into some jewy shit story? If the ugly noses stopped proving they are such manipulators and schemers from the only way they know how to interact and were truly eradicated, the world would be a better place.
Are you earning your OT shekels on this Saturday?

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,408

@previous (C)

> Why did your narcissistic ass have to turn this into some jewy shit story? If the ugly noses stopped proving they are such manipulators and schemers from the only way they know how to interact and were truly eradicated, the world would be a better place.
> Are you earning your OT shekels on this Saturday?

Blah blah blah, white people are superior because they controlled Africa, Jews are evil because they controlled Europeans, blah blah blah why do blacks call us evil.


You know how stupid this contradiction sounds? White people sound exactly like Jews.

SakawaBoyGenius double-posted this 6 months ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,409

https://youtu.be/L1qyu06Chek

Anonymous D replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,411

@1,376,402 (SakawaBoyGenius)
Britan was never christian, they worship the hellenic gods more than anything. Which is a bit funny considering how they resisted rome when it was around.
@1,376,403 (SakawaBoyGenius)
The south does not give a single fuck about some retarded yanks opinions
@1,376,402 (SakawaBoyGenius)
> I don’t even know what you’re on about there.
I am jacks complete lack of surprise.

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 0 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,412

Nothing against Jews by the way. Jews are awesome. They make good stuff… bagels… the Old Testament… bagels…

SakawaBoyGenius double-posted this 6 months ago, 34 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,413

@1,376,411 (D)
Well it seems like they gave a fuck when they surrendered to the federal government lol

SakawaBoyGenius triple-posted this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,415

The south has guns, the federal government has over five thousand nuclear weapons, the south never rose again, go figure.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 months ago, 53 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,416

jews aren't people. Can we go back to the linguistics of the thread. There's a lot of countries in Africa. ... Fuck is this really a jew problem with broad 'African-resident' rather than an Egyptian, Moroccan, or whatever African country.

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 56 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,417

The Supreme Court also decided that succession is illegal and statehood is eternal so succession from the United States would be considered and act of war, so the probability the United States would actually use those nuclear weapons is higher than one might think.

SakawaBoyGenius double-posted this 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,419

@1,376,416 (C)
Bleh, "Jews aren’t people." If you’re so superior why can’t you defeat these supposed sub-humans. Hell I’m black, if Africans are inferior, how come every single white empire in Africa failed? Up until the 1990s, Europe had a higher population than Africa. If Europeans are so smart and we really are just monkeys, how come Africa has twice as many people as Europe now and how come the fastest growing economies are in Africa?

SakawaBoyGenius triple-posted this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,420

I mean, white supremacists, the alt right, there’s all this talk of "oh the brown people are invading." Okay. Well if brown people are inferior, why are we winning? There are no brown countries getting overrun with white people. You know what percentage of Nigeria is white?

Anonymous D replied with this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,421

@1,376,416 (C)
Your letting a nigger coerce you into a debate, which is one of the least productive things imaginable.

SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 6 months ago, 43 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,422

@previous (D)
How can it be the case that white people are superior and white people are victims? Explain why you’re superior but you always lose.

SakawaBoyGenius double-posted this 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,424

And blah blah blah, nigger nigger nigger. Nigger isn’t an argument. It doesn’t prove anything. Name calling doesn’t make you right about anything, you just do it because you’re too stupid and lazy to come up with a real argument because you know you can’t make one because you’re wrong.

SakawaBoyGenius triple-posted this 6 months ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,428

And what about you is superior anyway? All you do is lie to make yourself feel better and act like a toddler. That’s not impressive.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 months ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,441

I'll break my issue down a little.

As an American nearly every other country has had an actual identity that corresponds through some form of history. Yes a lot of wars happened. Yes cultures overtook each other and interbred. The fights are still going. To me, it seems outside of my country people used to have a sense of identity, maybe solidarity, with their communities on a smaller scale, and within their country on a larger scale. Levels of civic pride.
Imperialism brought people back to origin countries. So what is the United States. We could probably throw Canada in there as well but it's beside my point.
Why are we identifying through colors? The U.S. was forced into this expansionist land. It feels like erasing heritage in exchange for ''equal' footing.' SBG you even seem to accept your color identity. Let's see, we have the colors black, white, brown, let's add yellow and red. Once travel seemed reasonable between Europe and North America it seems that imperialism took advantage of expansionist markets.
There aren't many distinctly nomadic cultures. Romani have their identity. So what was the need to erase the European lineage of those in the new world? A lot of locations around the United States held onto their communities. It has really only been recently that these communities have disintegrated. I bet the identity through color has changed in understanding in a different way in the last 80yrs than over a 100 years ago. So why does a first step towards dehumanization bring equality in some people's minds?

SakawaBoyGenius joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 10 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,376,444

@previous (C)
Tbh it’s been my experience that if you don’t look white and you go to a non-English speaking country, people don’t necessarily see you as an American. What people think of you is mostly determined by what culture they’re from. For example, if someone is only exposed to black people from Africa, they might just see a black person and start speaking to you in French instead of English.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.