Notice: Welcome to Minichan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can restore your ID.
Topic: Belief in God and Christians currently in Texas.
Anonymous A started this discussion 23 hours ago#127,276
Christian parents send children to a Christian camp. Gods weather not so much so good. DOGE laid off thousands of weather forecasters. 27 Christians are not returning to Christian homes.
Still blows my mind people actually believe in this so called God.
PS: Over the top sarcasm mixed in.
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 23 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,375,566
27 young girls drowned to death... imagine how terrified they must've been in those final moments. And your first instinct is to use that to score internet points? You don't have to believe in God, but basic human decency shouldn't be that hard.
> 27 young girls drowned to death... imagine how terrified they must've been in those final moments. And your first instinct is to use that to score internet points? You don't have to believe in God, but basic human decency shouldn't be that hard.
> but basic human decency shouldn't be that hard
I feel the pain of the parents. I feel the pain at loss of life. The many INCELS of this forum will feel...
This reminds me of the World Trade center disaster. The millions who were praying to God while they watched the 2nd plane head in for Islam victory. Apparently the terrorists who prayed to Allah, got what they were after.
Because if someone is seeking to take a higher moral position they should probably strive to be better than the people they are criticising. In this case, Republicans. Your rationale of "why should Syntax be held to a higher standard than the shitbags whose indifferent cruelty he's mocking?" is idiotic.
> You can mock someone for stupidity without being moral
Yes, you can, and so I again ask you: which kind of "higher standard" were you referring to in the post I quoted, if not moral? A higher standard of intelligence?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 20 hours ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,375,599
@previous (F)
You of course are intitled to your opinion. One can be sure of the many soon to be funerals, a pastor is going to use the cop out - We don't know what Gods master plan is.
SakawaBoyGenius replied with this 20 hours ago, 33 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,375,606
@1,375,600 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Tbh I really wish liberals would distinguish between Catholics and Protestants because I don’t like Evangelicals either. But using Christian and Evangelical interchangeably creates a false dichotomy between atheism and extreme Christianity. I don’t know any Catholics that believe that natural disasters happen when people don’t believe hard enough. I mean, we all die in the end anyway, so I don’t think death is particularly a sign of anything at all. God promised us one thing. Some people call it the great equalizer. You think you’re better than me? Well we’re both going to be worm food…
I’m not gay but I’m not homophobic either. Pretending to be a gay black dude as a white dude for days on end saying you like cocks over and over again is extremely gay though. Not saying I hate gay people, but like… just because you say it with my name doesn’t mean it’s not still you saying it Meta. It’s extremely gay of you.
SakawaBoyGenius triple-posted this 20 hours ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,375,610
Tbh the belief that your luck in life is a sign of whether you’re going to Heaven is a Protestant belief. Catholicism is actually the other way around. Poverty is considered to be a virtue. I mean, the Protestant belief has some benefits, like this whole workaholic American culture did create a lot of prosperity. It also sorta justifies racism though because if you believe how rich you are is a sign of how much God loves you, that makes it easy to look down on people poorer than you which tends to keep them poorer. Which is pretty unethical.
> Should he be held to a higher standard of intelligence? Of decency?
That's what I'm asking you.
> Why must the non religious go high when the religious constantly go low?
To elevate yourself above the level of the people you're disdaining. Otherwise you're no different to the people you're mocking and you might as well spend your time holding yourself in contempt instead of them.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 20 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,375,614
@1,375,606 (SakawaBoyGenius) > God promised us one thing.
If you look it up you will discover science has found the most ancient of bones with arthritis in the joints. This God of yours created man and cancer.
Clearly God failed genetics 101.
> I'm not a racist. You're the one always shouting about being a gay black Japanese boy.
I’m not gay or Japanese. That’s a guy impersonating me. Although if I was, black, gay, and Japanese, if you had a problem with that, that would make you a racist though. A lot of people have sarcasm deficiency though.
I don’t think I ever said I was Japanese. I think I said I was Chinese as a joke one time because somebody said I wasn’t black so it was a sarcastic thing.
> >God promised us one thing. > If you look it up you will discover science has found the most ancient of bones with arthritis in the joints. This God of yours created man and cancer. > Clearly God failed genetics 101.
I was referring to death. Death is natural. So brining up disease as a counterargument to me saying God promised us death doesn’t really make sense. If anything that supports what I was saying lol. Also I believe in evolution. Genetic mistakes are a part of nature. Just because God exists doesn’t mean radiation can mess up your DNA and cause cancer. God isn’t bending the trajectory of every little stray proton to perfectly miss a biological organism.
SakawaBoyGenius double-posted this 18 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,375,658
The whole reason the Japanese thing was funny though is because a sakawa boy is a slang term originating from Ghana that means internet scammer, but there’s also a World War Two era Japanese battleship that was coincidentally called the Sakawa.
> So just to be clear, you don't think we should kill whitey?
I think we should kill Nazis. White people are not Nazis. Most Nazis are white people. Most of them, but not all. There is also Kanye West and some obnoxious people in Japan who try to spread the message that immigrants are destroying the peace by being way more problematic and loud and disruptive than the foreigners are.
SakawaBoyGenius joined in and replied with this 18 hours ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,375,679
Although tbh I find it hard to take white nationalists seriously, because they try and talk all this talk to seem though, but then they’re always the most bitchy people. Like they’ll say Europe should be white but then if you bring up South Africa they start crying about how unfair it is for these poor poor colonizers who own 80% of the land that get killed occasionally for absolute no reason and totally not because they’re a tiny minority controlling the majority of a nations resources.
SakawaBoyGenius double-posted this 17 hours ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,375,680
Not saying murder is justified: just saying, white people don’t get killed in South Africa because white people in Africa never did anything wrong. Not saying it’s justified, it’s not, just saying, you don’t have to be that intelligent to put two and two together. Maybe people don’t appreciate being murdered and enslaved for hundreds of years and then being told by wealthy people who stole all their resources that they should be thankful because the white man is so much smarter.