We report what is believed to be the first photographic recording of a quaternary rainbow in nature. It appears on the Sun side of the sky with its red arc at a radius of about 45° from the Sun. The original pictures have been subjected to various forms of image processing to reveal the tertiary rainbow as well as the quaternary rainbow, which are separated by only a few degrees with their colors reversed and their red arcs adjacent to each other.
You can definitely see the third one to the right if you look in the clouds. The fourth (on the left) is less visible, but it is there. Here is an article with more descriptive analysis.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,359
@previous (A)
Yup! I see it now (the third one). I've seen a few double rainbows in my time, makes me wonder if I wasn't looking close enough and seen one of these quads before. I even drove through the bottom of a rainbow once, I know they aren't supposed to have bottoms usually, but this one did, the bottom was on a 4 lane highway. There was no fucking gold.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
The Editor !FuckWtfW8M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,360
Paul Vasquez just krame so hard.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,362
sluggy joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,363
@228,359 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
You were at the beginning. It's not the bottom, but the END of a rainbow. Please, don't discount historically accurate information when you are ignorant of even the basic science behind it
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,371
@previous (sluggy)
But a rainbow doesn't have a beginning or end, only bottoms. Science has trolled all of you.
The Editor !FuckWtfW8M replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,373
@228,362 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
God damn. He is so fucking ecstatic. Like he's on ecstasy, but he isn't even on ecstasy, man. I don't know what his deal is, but I envy him. I really do. :')
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 47 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,376
@previous (The Editor !FuckWtfW8M)
Replace the word "rainbow" with "penetration" and that video is so much more hilarious.
sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,379
@228,373 (The Editor !FuckWtfW8M)
He wasn't even high. He smokes marijuana, but hadn't before seeing the double rainbow.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#228,388