Topic: Anyone seen ''A Serbian Film''?

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #12,640

Is it worth watching or just hyped shit?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #227,236

I thought that it was gory and funny.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,237

It does have a lot of child sex scenes, so if you can't handle it, I wouldn't watch it.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,238

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

I guess I can handle that. I just spend 30 minutes searching for a decent download mirror, a ridiculous time for a movie on the internet. I hope that was a good investment.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,240

@previous (A)
It's on Demonoid. The movie did have kind of a ridiculous storyline but if you are a fan of shock cinema (as I am), it's worth a look.

dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,241

i wanted to watch it but then i realized i dont want to be scarred for life

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,242

@previous (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
You must have prior issues if a fictional movie can scar you for life.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,244

yes

dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,245

@227,242 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
that depends on your definiton of scarred for life

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,246

@227,244 (D)
Why do you have Peter Pan as a background?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,247

@227,245 (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
What is your definition?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,250

@227,237 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Errr... Wouldn't that make it illegal?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 21 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,251

@227,246 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
because anonymous d is a faggot

Anonymous F double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,252

@227,250 (E)
the sex scenes are not graphic, just very heavily implied. if you dont have a high tolerance for the insinuation or gore or those kinds of taboos, dont watch it.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,253

@227,250 (E)
He's right, they aren't graphic. Also, perhaps Serbia has different obscenity laws.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,254

@227,251 (F)
Is he toaster?

Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 8 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,255

@227,252 (F)
I wasn't interested in watching it anyway, but thank you for clarifying.

Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,257

@227,254 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
i have no idea.
@previous (E)
yeah no prob, bud.

orc !WBRXcNtpf. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,260

@227,244 (D)
Fapfapfapfapfap

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,261

@227,246 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Why not? :3

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,262

@previous (D)
It's a little odd. Do you like that version of Peter Pan? Have you read the books?

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 11 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,263

@227,254 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> Is he toaster?
lolno

Anonymous D double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,264

@227,262 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Never seen Peter Pan, or read it. Or even know the story tbh...

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,265

@previous (D)
Maybe you should. That movie is filled with that little boy,if you like him. It's also a pretty entertaining story.

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,266

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> little boy

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #227,268

I didn't like it at all. It was a really disturbing, and depressing movie for me. If you're interested though, might as well just watch it.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #227,271

@227,266 (D)
He seems like a little boy to me.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #227,272

@227,268 (H)
It had one of the most depressing endings ever.

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #227,277

@227,271 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> Born February 5, 1989
> little boy
> age 22

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #227,285

> a film of Rasa helping a woman give birth to a baby girl; Rasa then proceeds to rape the newborn in what the director calls "newborn porn".
WTF

Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #227,287

@previous (I)
it's just sensationlism, dude.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #227,296

@227,277 (D)
Well, he was 17 when the movie was made but he does look much younger. That's kind of the point though.

(Edited 28 seconds later.)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #227,297

@227,285 (I)
They don't show it.

Minichan