Notice: Welcome to Minichan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can restore your ID.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,101
Malema: Kill the boer, shoot to kill, kill the farmer!
Trump: Why don't you arrest that guy?
Ramaphosa: But rainbow nation, blah blah.
Bleeding heart racist liberal left: DOES NOT COMPUTE! Orange man bad! Orange man ambushed black man with unfair questions! Real problem orange man, not black man inciting violence!
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,200
If whites are so proud of being white, be white. You’re not black. Why are white people trying to be black? Blacks come from Africa, whites come from Europe. If you get shot where you don’t belong, that’s not a crime, that’s called trespass and self defense.
Anonymous D triple-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,201
After all the disrespect, why should anyone care if white people die? It is of zero concern to me and it shouldn’t be or any concern to you if you are a white person living in a white country where you belong. Don’t worry about it, it’s not your problem and you don’t want to make it into your problem.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,232
@1,367,198 (D) > Yeah, they should be killed. Whites think they own Africa. That’s not okay. We will deal with them however we want to in self defense.
OK, as long as you are aware and understand that this kind of attitude is what separates a civilised person from a savage.
@1,367,200 (D) > Blacks come from Africa, whites come from Europe. If you get shot where you don’t belong, that’s not a crime, that’s called trespass and self defense.
So in that case you'd also be perfectly OK if British people were to go around shooting all the hordes of Nigerian immigrants currently occupying their country? Got it.
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,235
@1,367,232 (C)
Nigerians are 0.4% of the UK’s population. Whites are 7% of South Africa’s population. Although whites are about 0% of Nigeria’s population. You have a different definition of how many people a hoard is than I do, but whatever. Facts don’t matter to racists, only feelings.
Anonymous E triple-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,236
It would really make more sense for whites to complain about Nigeria than South Africa since Nigeria is basically a 100% ethnically black society and foreigners aren’t allowed to own land in Nigeria. White people are doing better in South Africa, they own 80% of the land there! South Africa is the best country for white people in Africa so why complain? You have it better there than anywhere else.
Anonymous E quadruple-posted this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,237
And white people have more rights in South Africa anyway simply by virtue of it being a democracy. There are plenty of authoritarian dictatorships in Africa white people could be complaining about. Why do white people never complain about Central African countries? At least in South Africa racism is illegal. This website is gonna mess the link up because it has a comma in it I already know and I’m not gonna bother with it.
Anonymous E quintuple-posted this 1 week ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,238
There are also way more Nigerians on planet earth than there are British people it’s like 200 million vs 60 million. So that shouldn’t be surprising that it looks like they’re hoarding in. They’re not, there are just more of them on Earth. It’s not personal, they have like five kids per woman, you have less than two. Figure that out and you’ll notice things will be different.
Anonymous E sextuple-posted this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,240
And if you do the math on that, all the women are having five kids, half the population is women, you’re having less than two, your population is going to shrink, the next generation they’re going to have 100 million times 5 more people. So they’ll be about 10x larger than your country, so it’s going to get a hell of a lot worse than it is now.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 23 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,247
@1,367,235 (E)
Let me give you some facts and statistics:
White people arrived in Africa before they set foot in North America. How far back in history do you need to go before it's OK to say your family is "from" somewhere? Is 500 years OK?
The Dutch arrived at the Cape in 1652. Between then and about the next 80 years, the white population grew from a few hundred to around 3000. If you really think they went around killing all the locals (the Khoisan) instead of trading with them you must be out of your mind. Sorry, it didn't happen.
The British defeated the Dutch and took the cape from them in 1806. Note that this is Europeans fighting Europeans for land controlled by them for over a century and a half.
In 1834 the British emancipated tens of thousands of slaves and repealed a bunch of laws, so that effectively made the Khoi equal citizens to the Europeans. By then the population was roughly an equal mix of black/white/Asian (Cape Malay) - a truly multicultural society.
This paints a very different picture to the one you seem to believe, doesn't it? But as you said, facts don’t matter to racists, only feelings. So I guess I'm wasting my time.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not the one making the argument that one particular race group belongs in one particular corner of the world and should stay put there. You are the one saying, quote:
"Blacks come from Africa, whites come from Europe."
And also saying therefore it's ok to murder people based solely on the fact that in your twisted opinion they have the wrong skin colour for their location.
I am highlighting how disgusting and despicable your argument is by turning it around on you... and you sure as hell don't like it.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,254
@previous (C)
That sentence is true though. White people are not from Africa. I think whites can visit Africa, obviously, but it isn’t valid to just show up and say you own something when you weren’t invited. White South Africans aren’t victims.
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,255
There is a double standard though. When the Japanese attacked America, didn’t the United States kill Japanese civilians? And has the American government ever apologized for that? So why can whites decide that killing civilians is justified but blacks don’t have the permission to decide for themselves their own morality the way that the west does?
Anonymous E triple-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,256
If the Japanese had arrived on the beaches of the pacific coast of the United States, and they won, and 7% of the American population was ethnically Japanese, but the Japanese owned 80% of the land, and the Japanese invented nuclear weapons first, that’s South Africa. It’s different.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,258
@1,367,254 (E) > That sentence is true though. White people are not from Africa. I think whites can visit Africa, obviously, but it isn’t valid to just show up and say you own something when you weren’t invited. White South Africans aren’t victims.
Can you not see how massively racist it is to advocate for murdering somebody based entirely on the colour of their skin?
If you can't then I have nothing more to say to you. You are beyond the pale and utterly morally bankrupt.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 40 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,259
And if whites showed up to South Africa originally, and moved there without fighting wars, and they were 7% of the population, they owned 7% of the land, they never built nuclear weapons, and instead of apartheid, they created a democracy and kept 7% of the seats in government, I wouldn’t have a problem with it. But that’s not what they did!
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 week ago, 49 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,260
@1,367,258 (C)
It’s not based on the color of their skin, it’s based on them being foreigners. I don’t have a problem with white people, I have a problem with foreigners showing up in other countries and taking control of everything.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 43 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,261
@previous (E) > It’s not based on the color of their skin, it’s based on them being foreigners. I don’t have a problem with white people, I have a problem with foreigners showing up in other countries and taking control of everything.
So you're xenophobic as well as racist then. Got it.
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,264
If Japanese people showed up on the beaches of California in the 1940s with guns, the white people would sure as hell fight them off now wouldn’t they? And that would involve killing them now wouldn't it? How is that racist?
Anonymous E quadruple-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,266
In the American constitution, doesn’t it say you have to be born in the United States to be the president? Why? Is it xenophobic to you? There’s a reason for it.
Anonymous E quintuple-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,268
And I don’t care whether blacks were already living there or not. If the empire of Japan was like "welp, California is a desert, it’s basically empty north of Los Angeles," nobody would ever buy that argument.
Anonymous E sextuple-posted this 1 week ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,367,271
In fact, a hundred years from today, today will be a hundred years ago. If Nigerians conquered the United Kingdom today, could someone say, "Well nobody was living in the field west of Nottingham a hundred years ago so actually the Nigerians that built a hydrogen bomb and threatened to drop it on London if the white people ever wanted a representative democracy are victims." Like how could you believe that?
> If Japanese people showed up on the beaches of California in the 1940s with guns, the white people would sure as hell fight them off now wouldn’t they? And that would involve killing them now wouldn't it? How is that racist?
> Malema: Kill the boer, shoot to kill, kill the farmer! > Trump: Why don't you arrest that guy? > Ramaphosa: But rainbow nation, blah blah. > Bleeding heart racist liberal left: DOES NOT COMPUTE! Orange man bad! Orange man ambushed black man with unfair questions! Real problem orange man, not black man inciting violence!
How come white people say hate speech is free speech until a black man does it? You white people are always telling blacks to be less sensitive when whites say we are animals and we should all be enslaved and killed. So what? Why should I care? I can’t feel it in me to care. I just don’t. I can’t.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,367,333
It’s worth pointing out it’s not "because of their skin color." Apartheid ended in 1994. These are the SAME people who did these crimes that are still alive today. We aren’t talking about original sin here.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 days ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,367,356
@1,367,329 (H)
Incitement to violence does not fall under the category of free speech, dummy. I'd have exactly the same problem if a white person did it, and completely disagree with those assholes you are talking about who say it's ok. So, nice attempt to play the "you're racist" card, but bad luck.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,367,380
@1,367,356 (C)
Every country has different laws about speech. If threats of violence are never justified, and we could really never make threats of violence, the United States wouldn’t exist because we would never be able to declare war against the British because that would be a threat of violence.
Anonymous M double-posted this 6 days ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,367,381
@1,367,356 (C)
In your description of the history of South Africa, you completely ignored the crimes committed by white South Africans who are still living. That’s why it was completely meaningless to me.
Anonymous M triple-posted this 6 days ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,367,384
There are a lot of wealthy South Africans, who outwardly portray an image of "I did this all myself." But if you do a little bit of digging into their family history, and I’m not talking about hundreds of years, I’m talking, look into what their parents did, look into what their grandparents did, a lot of them got their wealth from treating black workers in ways that would be considered human rights violations, and a lot of them come from family backgrounds with ideologies that could be considered either Nazism or close to it. And the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. You can’t pretend there is no evil there at all. It’s not the same as white Americans.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,367,388
And, if you want to disagree with this, disagree with this. But if a minority of a country decides to exploit the resources of that nation and force segregation on the native black population, and make the majority of the country live in worse conditions, it could be the case that someone who violated the human rights of black people does not feel safe living around black people. And maybe that person wants to live in a community that excludes black people because of it. My belief is that such a person does not have the right to do that on African soil. You can’t exclude blacks from anything ever in the continent black people originate from. I consider that mentality to be an existential threat to the existence of our race, and I have zero empathy for people who are that way. And if I’m wrong for that, then oh well, I guess I’m just going to be wrong.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,367,443
In the past, Europe used to have a higher population than Africa. In the late 90s, that changed. Now, Africa is about twice the size of Europe in terms of population. In the past, Europeans had more people, they had guns, we didn’t. So the Europeans told themselves they could exploit us because we were inferior even though guns were a technology invented by the Chinese so it can’t be attributed to European intellect. Just a lucky accident of trade routes going from China to Europe first before Africa due to geography. But now that’s different, now African nations have guns, planes, tanks, Egypt has 8 submarines, South Africa still has enough highly enriched uranium left over from the apartheid regime to create gun type nuclear weapons at will should they ever choose to do so. White nationalists can talk about "defending their people" in the homeland of their people, but if you think you’re going to get away with "defending your people" in Africa, it will not go the way you want it to go. It just won’t.