Topic: FAO: Oldheads
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #126,181
Not that there's new blood. I may as well be saying "FAO: Everybody".
Does anyone have a more complete archive of AnonTalk? I have the Authorizedtroll archive and IWAB to cross-reference, but AnT had a ton of snippet text to describe slightly obtuse features. The unique features that didn't get cloned/were added after cloning, and the text describing them are seemingly completely lost, including exclusion from the Wayback Machine.
Does anyone have a more complete archive of AnonTalk? I have the Authorizedtroll archive and IWAB to cross-reference, but AnT had a ton of snippet text to describe slightly obtuse features. The unique features that didn't get cloned/were added after cloning, and the text describing them are seemingly completely lost, including exclusion from the Wayback Machine.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 day later[^] [v] #1,366,490
*sigh*tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 hours ago, 1 month later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,374,225
I take it you've seen the Wiseguy screenshots (pic related)? Imgur gallery here.And the Handbook? https://bulletins.iwantabro.com/pages/handbook
I'll check if I have anything else archived. I probably still have the original .7z Savetheinternet gave me, somewhere—not everything made it onto IWAB, although I'm pretty sure it's just the threads that didn't make the cut (I had no interest in hosting an archive of CSAM discussions lol).
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 hours ago, 8 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,374,226
> Not that there's new blood.
We actually had a few new peeps when 4chan went down
Most of them seem to have left
Couple new faces these last couple months tho
We actually had a few new peeps when 4chan went down
Most of them seem to have left
Couple new faces these last couple months tho
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 5 hours ago, 22 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,374,231
@previous (D)
> We actually had a few new peeps when 4chan went down
Despite the decent spike in traffic, that initial period only saw us gain ~20 newfriends who actually posted -- and the majority of those didn't hang around longer than a day. It's hard to say how many actually stayed because newcomers don't tend to stick to one UID and I don't really care to stalk users, but the quiet /bumps page kinda speaks for itself. I know a few are still posting though.
> We actually had a few new peeps when 4chan went down
Despite the decent spike in traffic, that initial period only saw us gain ~20 newfriends who actually posted -- and the majority of those didn't hang around longer than a day. It's hard to say how many actually stayed because newcomers don't tend to stick to one UID and I don't really care to stalk users, but the quiet /bumps page kinda speaks for itself. I know a few are still posting though.
epoch flicker !!//ofCutyg joined in and replied with this 3 hours ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,374,252
Does 2022 count as a newfag?
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 3 hours ago, 24 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,374,263
@previous (epoch flicker !!//ofCutyg)
No longer classifies as a newfag IMO but I wouldn't say oldfag either.
No longer classifies as a newfag IMO but I wouldn't say oldfag either.