Topic: r04r
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #12,597
can the headline of threads which have unread replies to my replies be italicized? i realize you're only capable of making minor changes to pre-existing code, but this should be within your range of capabilities.
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #226,078
way to ask for something
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 34 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,082
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,088
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,089
@226,078 (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
I'm not asking her to do it, I'm asking if she can do it. I'm seriously not sure.
I'm not asking her to do it, I'm asking if she can do it. I'm seriously not sure.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 8 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,090
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,098
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,099
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,103
Pretty good idea though
Handel !khEOdtKF56 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 35 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,154
Use the extension asshat.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #226,158
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #226,218
@previous (A)
show the botnet code in the source wiseass, im sure you know howto unpack the extension and inspect the source
show the botnet code in the source wiseass, im sure you know howto unpack the extension and inspect the source
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #226,226
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #226,228
@226,218 (G)
Let me know when she releases an uncompiled version compressed using a non-propitiatory, non-password protected file format
Let me know when she releases an uncompiled version compressed using a non-propitiatory, non-password protected file format
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 16 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,624
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 37 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,678
LOL OP IS A HERO
r04r joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 44 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,707
@226,228 (A)
Derp. Download the http://minichan.org/chrome-extension/minichan.crx file (Use another browser so you can save it), rename it to .zip and voila. Code. Orrr, click on the wrench->tools->extensions, enable developer mode on the top right, scroll down to the MinichanNotifier (after installation, ofc), click the background.html and tadaah, use the chrome inspector to see everything. To inspect the popup right click the icon and choose inspect popup. To inspect the settings page go there and right click, inspect element.
@226,624 (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
The header of the file is slightly different to include additional data like the file signature and public key it's signed by (IIRC), but after that it's plain regular zip.
Derp. Download the http://minichan.org/chrome-extension/minichan.crx file (Use another browser so you can save it), rename it to .zip and voila. Code. Orrr, click on the wrench->tools->extensions, enable developer mode on the top right, scroll down to the MinichanNotifier (after installation, ofc), click the background.html and tadaah, use the chrome inspector to see everything. To inspect the popup right click the icon and choose inspect popup. To inspect the settings page go there and right click, inspect element.
@226,624 (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
The header of the file is slightly different to include additional data like the file signature and public key it's signed by (IIRC), but after that it's plain regular zip.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,769
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,774
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,778
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,779
r04r double-posted this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,781
@226,778 (A)
Also, yes:
http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/report.html?id=2ea3253d6bba221566b917d3a68d60fe2047f5e8fc573ff594a6cac8ae804531-1317766863
http://www.virustotal.com/url-scan/report.html?id=da1cd1700e5c270933d935d4a8613f03-1317759183
Also, yes:
http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/report.html?id=2ea3253d6bba221566b917d3a68d60fe2047f5e8fc573ff594a6cac8ae804531-1317766863
http://www.virustotal.com/url-scan/report.html?id=da1cd1700e5c270933d935d4a8613f03-1317759183
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,787
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,788
@previous (A)
Not a very believable threat name, is it? I expected something better from you :/ Click more info.
Not a very believable threat name, is it? I expected something better from you :/ Click more info.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,791
@previous (r04r)
Don't kid yourself thinking they'd have an individual entry just for you. They probably easily detected your juvenile attempts using their advanced algorithms. But more likely they probably recognized it because you probably didn't even write the code in the first place, just copied and pasted it from some script kiddie website and slapped MC's logo on it.
Don't kid yourself thinking they'd have an individual entry just for you. They probably easily detected your juvenile attempts using their advanced algorithms. But more likely they probably recognized it because you probably didn't even write the code in the first place, just copied and pasted it from some script kiddie website and slapped MC's logo on it.
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,792
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,795
@previous (r04r)
"tactic"? If you knew anything about antivirus software (which you should if you're going to try and build a botnet), then you should know antivirus software has evolved past recognizing exact copies of malware, it's how they catch self-modifying code. Your copy/paste code was far below even a textbook example of what they can do.
"tactic"? If you knew anything about antivirus software (which you should if you're going to try and build a botnet), then you should know antivirus software has evolved past recognizing exact copies of malware, it's how they catch self-modifying code. Your copy/paste code was far below even a textbook example of what they can do.
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,796
@previous (A)
First you claim that it's closed source and encrypted, you're given an explanation on how to access the source and change tactic that AVG shows that alert, and then you say that it didn't and I shouldn't flatter myself because my copy-paste javascript code (Which you can see for yourself, again) which is ran in a sandbox by chrome and can't do any harm to the operating system is detected by a heuristics scanner.
What'll be next? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvfD5rnkTws
First you claim that it's closed source and encrypted, you're given an explanation on how to access the source and change tactic that AVG shows that alert, and then you say that it didn't and I shouldn't flatter myself because my copy-paste javascript code (Which you can see for yourself, again) which is ran in a sandbox by chrome and can't do any harm to the operating system is detected by a heuristics scanner.
What'll be next? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvfD5rnkTws
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,801
@previous (r04r)
I was only assuming it was closed sourced and encrypted, given who "wrote" it I didn't think it would be worth my time to check.
I was only assuming it was closed sourced and encrypted, given who "wrote" it I didn't think it would be worth my time to check.
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,802
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,803
@226,796 (r04r)
> AVG shows that alert, and then you say that it didn't
never said it didn't. I was only explaining why the threat name
> AVG shows that alert, and then you say that it didn't
never said it didn't. I was only explaining why the threat name
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,804
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 34 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,805
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,806
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,807
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,808
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,809
implying anyone would share a botnet via a plugin for an obscure bbs
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,810
@previous (dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46)
implying anyone would care about a footer link for an obscure bbs
implying anyone would care about a footer link for an obscure bbs
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 7 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,811
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 18 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,812
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,814
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,817
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,818
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,820
> mfwAnonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,821
@226,818 (r04r)
If presenting syntax to users was a good design, we'd just be reading html files. No need for a renderer!
If presenting syntax to users was a good design, we'd just be reading html files. No need for a renderer!
(Edited 30 seconds later.)
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 0 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,822
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,823
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,828
@previous (r04r)
Because you're implying the "correct" way to display the message is use some technical syntax. Humans don't read syntax. We read natural language, despite what you wnat to believe.
Because you're implying the "correct" way to display the message is use some technical syntax. Humans don't read syntax. We read natural language, despite what you wnat to believe.
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,830
@previous (A)
syn·taxNoun/ˈsinˌtaks/
1. The arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language.
syn·taxNoun/ˈsinˌtaks/
1. The arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #226,831
dreamworksage !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #226,832
what is happening
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #226,864
The Editor !FuckWtfW8M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #226,888
sluggy joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #227,063
I'd join r04r's bonnet before I'd join OP's pity party
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #227,079
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #227,087
What's going on here?sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #227,100
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #227,103
I still havent seen the actual code that does the botnetting. @OP is a troll.