r04r joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,011
@OP
No for the embed because embedding images from external sources allows IP harvesting and we all know how much channers dislike that. Uploading multiple images to the site and them embedding them within your post is a lot of work on my side, so no.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,013
@previous (r04r) > any amount of effort besides superficial stylesheet changes = too much work
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,014
@previous (A)
I haven't even touched the stylesheets myself beside a few minor changes, actually.
inb4 > any amount of effort = too much wor
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,016
@previous (r04r) > wor
Writing a full post is too mu
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,017
@226,011 (r04r)
Such is why I have "<img src=" filtered.
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 43 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,019
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,023
> bar users from image embed for IP harvesting > uses image embed herself for...
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 36 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,024
Also, there were boards in the 90s which allowed multiple images in a post.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 53 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,025
@226,019 (r04r)
He only takes you when you've said his name fully, you newfag. I will sacrafice myself to demonstrate how to do it properly. Candlejack. Oh hey, looks li
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#226,026