Notice: Proxies are blocked from creating accounts. Please visit the site without using a proxy first or restore your ID.

Minichan

Topic: Official Minibriton Election Poll

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU started this discussion 1 week ago #125,932

Who will you be voting for, and why/?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
3 21%
- 0%
1 7%
7 50%
1 7%
2 14%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 17 minutes later[^] [v] #1,364,092

Not a real country.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,102

Write in: Does anyone even care?

Anonymous C double-posted this 1 week ago, 21 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,103

@previous (C)

> Write in: Does anyone even care?

Not me!

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 12 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,116

Liebour of course.

Erik !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 7 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,172

Reform because I want the system to burn down

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,224

BNP

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,235

@1,364,172 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)

Looks like Reform are winning the Minichan seat

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,301

This is the year of the Lib Dem surge I can feel it.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,398

I'm voting for nepotism.

I knew the candidate's dad, who died last year. He was a brilliant guy, and from what I've seen the candidate doesn't fall far from the tree. My city's district usually does well with indy candidates too, so it's less likely to be a wasted vote.

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,410

@1,364,172 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)

> Reform because I want the system to burn down

Congrats, you're getting your wish.

Although to be fair I thought Sir Keir Starmer's speech just now was excellent. He was asked by the BBC if he recognised that the average working people of the country were really struggling with the cost of living crisis and that it's driving voters more and more towards the extreme right. His response was spot on:

"We are going to stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes".

He was also asked if he realised that Labour courting right-wing votes is a losing strategy because all it does is disenfranchise the Labour base while giving the likes of Reform licence to push the Overton window more and more to the right. Sir Keir replied:

"Vladimir Putin's brutal and unprovoked full-scale invasion of Ukraine was a violation of the international rules-based order and we will stand by Ukraine for as long as it takes"

Finally he was asked if he could promise English pensioners that he would reverse his decision to take away their winter fuel allowance. Sir Keir responded:

"We are going to send 3 billion pounds a year to Ukraine for as long as it takes".

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc double-posted this 6 days ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,423

Now The Guardian have just put a question to the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer. They asked him to address the accusation that Labour is moving right because now they are in power they’re beholden to the lobbyists who offer them a 6-hour-a-month job with a salary of £180k a year on exit from office if they just push through one tiny change to a policy that the media won’t even cover.

Sir Keir replied:

"Look, what the British people want to know is if we will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes, and I assure them that we will".

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc triple-posted this 6 days ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,426

The Observer is now asking Sir Keir about whether his own cabinet has contributed to the disenfranchisement of the left, given that Streeting, Cooper, Reeves and Healey have shown us they are right wing nuts for at least a decade. Cooper, the journalist pointed out, was responsible for the immigration mugs in 2015, Healey has never met a brown person he did not want to bomb, Wes has hated socialists since his student union days, and also in Cooper's case we have overt corruption with she and her husband flipping houses to extort the expenses system.

Sir Keir replied:

"Vladimir Putin has waged a war on our democratic values and we will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes".

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU (OP) replied with this 6 days ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,448

There is fake news and Russian propaganda in this thread. Can you guess the name of the faggot delivering it?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 49 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,459

Why do we blame everyone but Putin for this?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,472

@1,364,423 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
You are vastly overestimating the effects of the Ukraine war on any economy besides Russia and Ukraine's

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 6 days ago, 31 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,474

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

> You are vastly overestimating the effects of the Ukraine war on any economy besides Russia and Ukraine's

I'm parodying Western politicians you berk. I know that the West doesn't give a fuck about the outcome. That's been my point all along. "WE HAVE TO KEEP SENDING HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS TO UKRAINE OR ELSE PUTIN WILL TAKE OVER THE WHOLE OF EUROPE" was always a retarded claim, but hey it got dumbass Westerners to silently acquiesce to one of the biggest wealth transfers in modern history.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 6 days ago, 51 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,475

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
its not a very effective parody

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 6 days ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,476

@1,364,472 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

> You are vastly overestimating the effects of the Ukraine war on any economy besides Russia and Ukraine's

In addition, you seem to be forgetting how everyone from Joe Biden ("the Putin price-hike") to Olaf Scholz ("We're going to ban all Russian gas and oil...Russia is weaponising energy and destroying our industry!!!") made up bullshit about the effect of this war on their economies to cover up their own fucktardery.

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc double-posted this 6 days ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,477

@1,364,475 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

> its not a very effective parody

It clearly was since it sailed over your head. Seriously dude, if you thought those were actual quotes I posted then I can see why your people are not trusted with consonants.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 6 days ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,520

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
...where did you get that you retard. the point is the comedic prowess you've managed to display here despite your ever-crippling developmental issues relies on the idea that the ukraine war is bad for the uk economy. that's db

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 6 days ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,522

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

> ...the point is the comedic prowess you've expertly display here relies on the idea that the ukraine war is bad for the uk economy. that's db

Very well, I'll walk you through it again:

No, it relies on the UK government having spent 3 years ACTIVELY SAYING it's bad for the UK economy. Shit, back in 2022 Boris Johnson even pinned the famous case of an elderly British woman having to ride around on buses all day to keep warm because she couldn't afford to heat her house on the Ukraine war, when in fact it was his own imbecility as Prime Minister.

Still to picking tulips, lad.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 6 days ago, 36 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,525

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Read through that one again lad

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 6 days ago, 57 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,539

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
So you admit you made a berk of yourself. Ok thanks, that'll be all.

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU (OP) replied with this 6 days ago, 27 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,547

Back to the topic, it seems the Miniprediction came completely true! Reform has dominated this election cycle!

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 6 days ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,553

@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
Time to ban them I guess, as Germany is now looking to do to the AfD.

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU (OP) replied with this 6 days ago, 23 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,561

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)

I don't believe in a Germany

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 10 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,562

Fair dos, Nige.

Lol, imagine voting for Labour.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 4 days ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,704

@OP
*Labor

Green !!bO/s3MBcD joined in and replied with this 4 days ago, 40 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,364,705

Reform
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.