Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,700
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,763
@previous (E)
Mostly dictionaries and encyclopedias, I think? Also, how many of them have you actually read more than a few pages out of?
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,766
@previous (F)
lol @ dictionaries
no encyclopedias either.
left bookcase is penguin classics, middle is hardcovers (Britannica's Great Books collection, A series by Churchill, and some belonging to the Left Book Club can be seen there (not encyclopedias lol), and right is religious works.
Why would I keep books I have read (unless they're pretty)? I gave away about 1000 earlier this year that I have read. Haven't have much reading time since I started college.
EDIT: I may actually have a 4 volume encyclopedia called "The World of Children" that I purchased for it's lovely embossed covers.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
hamfist !!snnYcROO9 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,847
I was going to buy Infinite Jest today but I figured I should finish at least Crime and Punishment
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,951
@225,635 (hamfist !!snnYcROO9)
These are ones I always read portions of, but never actually sit down and read all the way through.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,953
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I like how you have a Richard Dawkins book and a guide on how to read the Bible.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,954
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yeah, I'd throw my KJV Bible in there too, but it hasn't shown up in the mail yet. Neither has The Selfish Gene. I like to think that I am open-minded.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,956
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Fair enough. I've flipped through a Bible myself, but purely out of curiosity.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,958
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I find that if you don't have a guide alongside you (either a book or a teacher/scholar), the Bible can seem impenetrable and/or boring. Once you have a better understanding of how, why, and when it was written (from a purely academic and non-religious perspective), it starts to make sense and becomes readable.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,968
Why would you do that? Do you also engage in masochism? If yes, I can understand buying a KJV to read. If not, I'm at a loss.
Also, every decent Bible prefaces each book with who, why, when (as far as it is known).
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,972
@previous (E)
I really like the language used in the KJV, so I bought it. If you have a version that has similar flowery prose, but is more intelligible, then I'd love to hear a recommendation. Also, none of the Bibles that I've ever seen have that preface in them.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,980
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,981
@225,972 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Not really. The bible wasn't written in flowery prose, so most translations don't try to add it in. You could get the NKJV I guess?
KJV won't have prefaces because it's marketed towards cults &c. Almost all modern translations will at least have a very basic preface to each of the books, briefly touching upon the facts, but focusing on the spiritual lessons. I thought it was special when I got a New English Bible which doesn't have prefaces or chapter/verses breaks &c.
I prefer Catholic translations. They're not as fundamentalist as a lot of the other sects, and usually have really useful footnotes and prefaces. Plus you get the Apocrypha, so it's better value.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 13 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,982
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,984
@225,951 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You don't have much room to criticize Hamfist with a library that pathetic son...
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,985
@225,981 (E)
Ah, okay. The "How to read the Bible" book is a completely academic exploration of the books of the bible though, so it probably is more in-depth in the actual history and scholarly conclusions than what is found in prefaces in the Bible.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,988
@225,984 (I)
I'm not bringing my whole book collection to college dude. There's just no way that could work out logistically.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,989
@225,985 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yes, they are necessary for further study, but one should not get lost in a casual reading (unless one is reading a 400 year old translation of faulty manuscripts lol).
We have to read a lot of that kind of thing for college.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,991
@225,988 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What do you have against Klosterman and Vonnegut?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,992
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#225,993
@225,991 (I)
I have nothing against them, and Vonnegut is one of my favorite authors. It's just that in America, pretty much every high school assigns them as required reading, and I was dicking around with Hamfist.
@225,989 (E)
I don't think that the Bible is divinely inspired in any sense, so I have no problem with a casual reading of a partially inaccurate version of it.
hamfist !!snnYcROO9 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 54 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#226,065
hamfist !!snnYcROO9 (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#226,073
@225,993 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Pfft, I wish high schools assigned Vonnegut
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#226,175
@226,065 (hamfist !!snnYcROO9) > Book on evolution by a world-class evolutionary biologist > Collection of other people's philosophical works by an erudite man
Fixed bro.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#226,309
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#226,331
@previous (K)
That's it? How many bad books does one about or by Ron Paul cancel out? Let's say that I have one Madea book, Paris Hilton's biography, the whole Left behind series and one very battered V.C. Andrews. How many Ron Pauls would I need to redeem myself?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#226,333
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
7 copies of every edition of every book he's ever written, at least.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#226,338
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Damn that's a lot of libertarian.
hamfist !!snnYcROO9 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#226,340