Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 month ago, 18 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,358,998
@1,358,985 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
The only times in the last 20 years when there was deflation was 2009 during the height of the GFC and Spring 2020 during COVID when everything shut down. Deflation is a sign that the economy is in extreme turmoil.
> My caste doesn't own stocks, I hope it falls even more.
I normally agree with Robert. A crashed market does mean one can buy on the cheep and later much later make lots of $$$$
However a crashed market also means a company is NOT going to invest in new products or even in their current products and that does greatly effect the economy.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 21 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,359,058
@1,358,998 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
High inflation is bad. Disinflation is usually good, because of the aforementioned high inflation we are currently experiencing. Many people, such as OatmealFucker, confuse disinflation or price fluctuations due to temporary market conditions for deflation.
> Literally everyone on Reddit complaining about the "stock crash"
Anyone who isn't dirt poor (or just financially unknowledgeable/incapable) owns at least some stocks or has some investment vehicle(s) tied to the performance of markets.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,359,089
@previous (K)
You can download an app and get a free $1 investment in a stock, so this metric is completely meaningless.
For most people, a stock rising has no real positive impact for them. Actually, it's usually a sign of something bad: the less they can pay you, and the more they can rip off the consumer the higher the stock goes.
Technically most people are on both sides as employees or consumers on the one hand, and nominally owning some stock on the other. In practice most of their financial interests are as employees and consumers. Loosing $100 and gaining a $1 means you could claim in some sense they profited, but they are still at a net loss.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,359,160
@1,359,080 (K)
I don't mind with the 401K stuff or 20 shares of Starbucks I picked up or whatever. Market corrections wreck day traders and businesses that shouldn't even exist so I'm fine if they get flushed out. If my net worth goes up or down by 20 or 30% it's all relative!
What you are panicking about and calling a "crash" is the dip at the end. Compare this with a real crash in 2020 which everybody ignored because they were too busy going bonkers over Covid, and it's ok when Democrats crash the economy, because Biden good, Trump bad.
Calm down.
Stock market dip like this => reduced spending => lower interest rates => deflation => better environment for small businesses to grow, and you can afford your groceries again. It's almost like Trump actually does seem to know what he's doing.
> Stock market dip like this => reduced spending => lower interest rates => deflation => better environment for small businesses to grow, and you can afford your groceries again. It's almost like Trump actually does seem to know what he's doing.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 month ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,359,190
@previous (K)
The only consistently funny part of the Trump era is watching his followers try to make up reasons why his plainly stupid ideas are actually secretly genius 4d chess.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,359,240
@1,359,190 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I don't think that's funny, at least not always. I find it depressing. It shows that large swathes of humanity can be tricked into supporting stupid ideas, as long as they like the person proposing them, or if they think it will defeat their enemies.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,359,241
If only Liz Truss had had that kind of charisma. She could have had British citizens applauding her dumb economic ideas instead of pressuring her to resign.
Anonymous J replied with this 1 month ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,359,268
@1,359,238 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
Incorrect. The real world analogue would be me standing on a public sidewalk speaking with my friend Mark and you suddenly pop up from a sewer hole, foaming at the mouth, ranting about people talking to you through your amalgam fillings. I was talking, in passing and briefly, about you. Not talking to you.
If they see them as enemies, and if the left can't put forward ideas that can reasonably attract that demographic then they should reevaluate their strategy.
More spending, more money printing, and telling people "government debt isn't like household debt, don't worry" is irresponsible and the households on the right haven't felt any benefit from reckless spending.
Real people are going to suffer when the bill comes due, and they'll be dealing with poverty and the interest payments for the selfish generations that came before.
The mantra of "it's not my job to educate you" and other anti-dialectical rhetoric puts off anyone that actually wants to examine these issues rationally and methodically.
A mob of people that can't think past the here and now isn't a functional government