Notice: Welcome to Minichan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can restore your ID.

Minichan

Topic: How come people love Cars now?

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 months ago #124,996

They used to shit all over these films and even called the original the first blunder Pixar ever made.

Now they're willing to suck dick for more content.

Why?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 28 seconds later[^] [v] #1,356,093

The auto industry, really. They killed public transit.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,094

Kids really like those movies and Disney had been doing very well with Cars merchandise for a long time now

(Edited 6 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 51 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,095

@1,356,093 (B)
There should be a spin-off series in the Cars universe that follows the day-to-day lives of public transportation vehicles. How the automotive industry killed their hopes of one day transporting, whatever the fuck they transport, from point A to point B.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,096

It's not that those older movies are getting better or growing on people, it's that the new movies coming out by comparison are a whole new level of complete and utter dogshit.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 7 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,097

@previous (D)
The live action Disney remakes?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 16 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,098

@1,356,095 (A)
hows a bus or train even work as a Car™? second movie shows the fact that a single tow truck is half the size of a heli so in order for a mass transport vehilce to work theyd have to go shadow of the colossus on that shit.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 11 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,102

@previous (E)
They already made a series of movies called Planes.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,104

@previous (A)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 6 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,107

Because these films are targeted toward young children, and as people who were young at the time grow to the age that dominates cultural discourse (teens to twenties), you'll start to see many more positive opinions of it. In 2007 or whenever it came out, five year olds weren't posting film reviews online, it was people who were well outside the targeted age range. This happens all the time with a lot of media aimed at kids.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 10 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,115

Catherine, you are a grown adult. You should not be getting worked up like this over movies for children.

boof joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 47 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,117

because there fags

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,125

Disney should build Cars Land somewhere else!!!!!

#BoycottCorporateGreed

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,157

I didn't mind this stuff at the time, had enough relatives at that age so this stuff was always on. They usually toss in a PG rated joke or two for the adults if you can survive the viewing.

I think they were worried it'd turn into Shrek 12 or something and decided to just swim in the hundreds of millions they made instead of watering down the IPs.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 months ago, 14 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,365

@1,356,097 (A)
Especially those. The new Snow White is utter trash.

> Because these films are targeted toward young children
That's a rubbish argument. Just because it's a movie for kids doesn't mean it's ok for it to be shitty brain rot.

Compare for example with Aladin - Howard Ashman and Alan Menken knew what they were doing. Newer writers and execs do not.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 3 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,393

@1,356,125 (I)
Disney’s California Adventure.

@previous (D)
Snow White should’ve been a light-skinned Latina. The original character could’ve always passed for one. Especially the clothing.

boof replied with this 2 months ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,416

I like a chick with real eyebrows

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,422

Catherine

Anonymous D replied with this 2 months ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,465

@1,356,393 (A)
> Snow White should’ve been a light-skinned Latina. The original character could’ve always passed for one. Especially the clothing.

Nah, the look of Snow White in the original cartoon was based on Hedy Lamarr - an Austrian actress - and the costume was a 1930s interpretation of 16th C German fashion, modified to look more like a (then) modern day movie star. It's also a Grimms Brothers story, so German/Austrian/Bavarian would be appropriate, not Hispanic.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,487

@1,356,393 (A)
nah man, its really only the wide eye gap that hints at a latino

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,752

Cussy

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 17 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,921

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Cursed.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,927

@1,356,752 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
@previous (M)
Bussy

(Edited 57 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,945

@1,356,465 (D)
Learn the clothing of Latine culture and get the fuck out.

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 2 months ago, 55 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,962

@1,356,921 (M)
I know, I'm sorry.

Dead !Pool..v42s double-posted this 2 months ago, 33 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,356,963

@1,356,927 (E)
I'm unsure how to feel

Anonymous E replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,357,003

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)

Anonymous D replied with this 2 months ago, 4 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,358,167

@1,356,945 (A)
> Learn the clothing of Latine culture and get the fuck out.
You seem upset.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,358,179

I will shit on my face!
:

You are required to fill in a captcha for your first 5 posts. That's only 5 more! We apologize, but this helps stop spam.

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.