Topic: Black Snape
Green !!bO/s3MBcD started this discussion 3 months ago #124,501
Are you ready?| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 2 | 25% | |
| Alan Rickman | 3 | 38% | |
| No | 3 | 38% |
You need more posts to be allowed to vote.
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) double-posted this 3 months ago, 22 seconds later[^] [v] #1,353,215
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,222
That's some very sallow skin...
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,239
Snape's hair looked the way it did because it was greasy and not taken care of. It's part of his tragic backstory. As a poor Briton from the 1960s he suffered classism and became bookish and unkempt. Not a sociable or clean fellow. This snape looks like he's just been to the combination Salon/Hospital/Dance Club. A black Snape should probably have knappy-ass dreadlocks tbh
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,240
@previous (C)
Now Harry Potters father will look like more of a piece of shit because the bullying has a racial element
What in the hell were they thinking?
Now Harry Potters father will look like more of a piece of shit because the bullying has a racial element
What in the hell were they thinking?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 7 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,290
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I wonder if they will dare do the scene where James Potter hangs him upside down.
I wonder if they will dare do the scene where James Potter hangs him upside down.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 6 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,293
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,295
i do not give a flying shit about harry potty, because its a poorly constructed story even by the standards of young adult fiction, so full of plotholes that it makes a sponge look solid in comparison, and its interesting points are routinely neglected or never go anywhere. the fact that its written by a feminist is just so hilarious to me though, because of course someone so defective would write something that makes startrek slash fanfiction look like high art in comparison.
HOWEVER, i do find it amusing that wokism has gone so far into retardation that its somewhat looped back into normalcy again. perhaps if this adaptation is successful we can see soon see a rebirth of national socialism, or the no-nonsense ideas of the founding fathers. either one is quite fantastic, honestly.
HOWEVER, i do find it amusing that wokism has gone so far into retardation that its somewhat looped back into normalcy again. perhaps if this adaptation is successful we can see soon see a rebirth of national socialism, or the no-nonsense ideas of the founding fathers. either one is quite fantastic, honestly.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
A User joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,296
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,299
@1,353,295 (F)
Its funny how you type how you do and still manage to feel superior to so many people
Its funny how you type how you do and still manage to feel superior to so many people
Anonymous F replied with this 3 months ago, 1 second later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,300
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 25 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,301
Just admit to being a racist.
A User replied with this 3 months ago, 7 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,302
Anonymous F replied with this 3 months ago, 24 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,305
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 15 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,306
Meta joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,308
They should have blacked Harry instead.Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 30 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,331
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 9 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,381
What is this?!?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 8 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,384
Anonymous E replied with this 3 months ago, 26 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,387
@1,353,293 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What about the scene where Neville's greatest fear is Snape. Or how Harry, Ron & Hermione are all immediately suspicious of the black professor?
How are they going to do any of this without making nearly all the main protagonists appear to be giant racists?
What about the scene where Neville's greatest fear is Snape. Or how Harry, Ron & Hermione are all immediately suspicious of the black professor?
How are they going to do any of this without making nearly all the main protagonists appear to be giant racists?
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 22 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,388
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,394
Anonymous F replied with this 3 months ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,412
@1,353,384 (B)
how is the rest of the world reacting to the british wizard governments vast incompetence? considering the entire global magic community is in this pact to keep magic secret from the normies, surely they have a vested interest in preventing a nutcase hopped up on immortal murder magic from gaining power? old moldybutt is like the second uber powerful dark wizard in recent memory(third if you count the adult duology in america) youd think theyd be locking shit down in brit-wiz-istan after any one of these events, but especially after moldybutt gets magic cylindered, considering how he apparently fucking traumatized everybody living at the time, but no.
and this is probably a minor one, but despite wands being stated to be made of magical variants of trees, joke rowling never thought in her twenty years of making halfasses poststoryline content and revisions, of making a wiggentree wand, despite it being a magical tree by default and widely used as a potion ingredient.
i could probably come up with tons more if i needed, but the story annoys me in a completely different way every time i take a close look so i wont.
how is the rest of the world reacting to the british wizard governments vast incompetence? considering the entire global magic community is in this pact to keep magic secret from the normies, surely they have a vested interest in preventing a nutcase hopped up on immortal murder magic from gaining power? old moldybutt is like the second uber powerful dark wizard in recent memory(third if you count the adult duology in america) youd think theyd be locking shit down in brit-wiz-istan after any one of these events, but especially after moldybutt gets magic cylindered, considering how he apparently fucking traumatized everybody living at the time, but no.
and this is probably a minor one, but despite wands being stated to be made of magical variants of trees, joke rowling never thought in her twenty years of making halfasses poststoryline content and revisions, of making a wiggentree wand, despite it being a magical tree by default and widely used as a potion ingredient.
i could probably come up with tons more if i needed, but the story annoys me in a completely different way every time i take a close look so i wont.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 43 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,416
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,426
@1,353,412 (F)
> how is the rest of the world reacting to the british wizard governments vast incompetence
The story is told from the perspective of Harry Potter, a teenager in Britain, and focuses on his personal journey. As such, the diplomatic actions or reactions of other countries aren’t explored in the novels. This isn’t a plot hole but rather a gap in world-building that could inspire a spin-off.
> despite wands being stated to be made of magical variants of trees, joke rowling never thought in her twenty years of making halfasses poststoryline content and revisions, of making a wiggentree wand
This also isn’t a plot hole... it’s more of a missed opportunity or an unexplored detail in the world-building. Not every magical tree necessarily needs to be represented as a wand wood for the story to remain consistent.
These points aren’t plot holes but rather examples of nitpicking, which often happens when fans are passionate about a series. It’s fun to consider these gaps, but they don’t detract from the story’s internal logic.
> how is the rest of the world reacting to the british wizard governments vast incompetence
The story is told from the perspective of Harry Potter, a teenager in Britain, and focuses on his personal journey. As such, the diplomatic actions or reactions of other countries aren’t explored in the novels. This isn’t a plot hole but rather a gap in world-building that could inspire a spin-off.
> despite wands being stated to be made of magical variants of trees, joke rowling never thought in her twenty years of making halfasses poststoryline content and revisions, of making a wiggentree wand
This also isn’t a plot hole... it’s more of a missed opportunity or an unexplored detail in the world-building. Not every magical tree necessarily needs to be represented as a wand wood for the story to remain consistent.
These points aren’t plot holes but rather examples of nitpicking, which often happens when fans are passionate about a series. It’s fun to consider these gaps, but they don’t detract from the story’s internal logic.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,431
@previous (B)
Also I believe that pieces from magical creatures are what gave the wands most of their power
Also I believe that pieces from magical creatures are what gave the wands most of their power
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 3 months ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,433
@1,353,290 (E)
Snape will be gay for James Potter and Lily will do the bullying in the new version. The classic line will be changed to "you have your father's eyes". I don't care if they want to make some characters black, Morgan Freeman as Dumbledore would've been cool and a black Quirrel would've still been canon, but Snape is the one character it really doesn't fit. Adam Driver would've made a great Snape.
Snape will be gay for James Potter and Lily will do the bullying in the new version. The classic line will be changed to "you have your father's eyes". I don't care if they want to make some characters black, Morgan Freeman as Dumbledore would've been cool and a black Quirrel would've still been canon, but Snape is the one character it really doesn't fit. Adam Driver would've made a great Snape.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 months ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,436
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
Yeah, that could work. They'll also have to remove the bit where Snape calls Lily a mudblood - can't have a black guy being racist. Lily could call him a dumb nigger instead... no wait, that won't work either, though it would lend itself nicely to the new trope defining itself where all the Gryffindors are, at their core, far right racist Quidditch hooligans.
Yeah, that could work. They'll also have to remove the bit where Snape calls Lily a mudblood - can't have a black guy being racist. Lily could call him a dumb nigger instead... no wait, that won't work either, though it would lend itself nicely to the new trope defining itself where all the Gryffindors are, at their core, far right racist Quidditch hooligans.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 53 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,441
Everyone was really racist in the 60s, they probably called this guy Snigger
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 3 months ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,486
@1,353,436 (E)
Also having Snape as the Half-blood Prince is just going to sound even more racist now. Half-blood Prince of Bel Air.
Also having Snape as the Half-blood Prince is just going to sound even more racist now. Half-blood Prince of Bel Air.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 months ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,492
Oh lawdy, Harry! Voldemort be's a'comin'! Broom, don' fails me now!
Anonymous E replied with this 3 months ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,571
@1,353,486 (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
> Also having Snape as the Half-blood Prince is just going to sound even more racist now. Half-blood Prince of Bel Air.
Even that doesn't make sense cos Paapa looks full on black, not mixed race.
@1,353,441 (B)
> Everyone was really racist in the 60s
*70s - Harry had young parents, but hey, it's another detail of the canon nobody cares about I guess.
> Also having Snape as the Half-blood Prince is just going to sound even more racist now. Half-blood Prince of Bel Air.
Even that doesn't make sense cos Paapa looks full on black, not mixed race.
@1,353,441 (B)
> Everyone was really racist in the 60s
*70s - Harry had young parents, but hey, it's another detail of the canon nobody cares about I guess.
türk joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 57 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,579
@previous (E)
> > Also having Snape as the Half-blood Prince is just going to sound even more racist now. Half-blood Prince of Bel Air.
> Even that doesn't make sense cos Paapa looks full on black, not mixed race.
>
>
> > Everyone was really racist in the 60s
> *70s - Harry had young parents, but hey, it's another detail of the canon nobody cares about I guess.
@1,353,436 (E)
> Yeah, that could work. They'll also have to remove the bit where Snape calls Lily a mudblood - can't have a black guy being racist. Lily could call him a dumb nigger instead... no wait, that won't work either, though it would lend itself nicely to the new trope defining itself where all the Gryffindors are, at their core, far right racist Quidditch hooligans.
haha
> > Also having Snape as the Half-blood Prince is just going to sound even more racist now. Half-blood Prince of Bel Air.
> Even that doesn't make sense cos Paapa looks full on black, not mixed race.
>
>
> > Everyone was really racist in the 60s
> *70s - Harry had young parents, but hey, it's another detail of the canon nobody cares about I guess.
@1,353,436 (E)
> Yeah, that could work. They'll also have to remove the bit where Snape calls Lily a mudblood - can't have a black guy being racist. Lily could call him a dumb nigger instead... no wait, that won't work either, though it would lend itself nicely to the new trope defining itself where all the Gryffindors are, at their core, far right racist Quidditch hooligans.
haha
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,597
@1,353,571 (E)
Harry Potter was born in 1980 when Lily was 20 years old, meaning she was born in 1960. Yet another fail from the self-proclaimed lore expert.
Harry Potter was born in 1980 when Lily was 20 years old, meaning she was born in 1960. Yet another fail from the self-proclaimed lore expert.
boof joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,353,609
@1,353,384 (B)
> >so full of plotholes that it makes a sponge look solid in comparison
Your a spongebob Harry
> >so full of plotholes that it makes a sponge look solid in comparison
Your a spongebob Harry
Anonymous E replied with this 3 months ago, 2 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,002
@1,353,597 (B)
> Harry Potter was born in 1980 when Lily was 20 years old, meaning she was born in 1960.
Yes, so she was at Hogwarts in the 70s, idiot.
> Harry Potter was born in 1980 when Lily was 20 years old, meaning she was born in 1960.
Yes, so she was at Hogwarts in the 70s, idiot.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 53 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,008
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,014
Everyone in this thread is a racist except me as I am part African.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 months ago, 10 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,016
Anonymous E replied with this 3 months ago, 5 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,044
@1,354,008 (B)
You said (retardedly, spraying cottage cheese out of your mouth as you said it):
> in the 60s, they probably called this guy Snigger
Who is "they"? We were talking about the Marauders, Lily & Black Snape when they were at school... in the 70s, because Hogwarts isn't a kindergarten, you utter spoon.
You said (retardedly, spraying cottage cheese out of your mouth as you said it):
> in the 60s, they probably called this guy Snigger
Who is "they"? We were talking about the Marauders, Lily & Black Snape when they were at school... in the 70s, because Hogwarts isn't a kindergarten, you utter spoon.
boof replied with this 3 months ago, 17 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,046
You know, that school has quite a name does it not. Was the founder Mr. Hogwarts?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,059
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 3 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,085
Anonymous E replied with this 3 months ago, 38 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,095
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,108
Anonymous E slinking off in defeat. I accept your unspoken apology, dweeb.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 5 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,109
Anonymous E replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,120
@1,354,108 (B)
lol, did you really expect me to respond to your last lame response? That was you realising (at long last) that you look like a complete tool and now you're trying to save face.
It's ok, you were a bit retarded. Don't let it get to you.
lol, did you really expect me to respond to your last lame response? That was you realising (at long last) that you look like a complete tool and now you're trying to save face.
It's ok, you were a bit retarded. Don't let it get to you.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,129
@previous (E)
Now you have to keep replying to this topic forever or you lose. You have confirmed your agreement with this arrangement.
Now you have to keep replying to this topic forever or you lose. You have confirmed your agreement with this arrangement.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,150
@1,354,120 (E)
The fat lady doth protest too much - you apparently think it's normal for someone under the age of 10 to be non-verbal and at "kindergarten" level education.
The fat lady doth protest too much - you apparently think it's normal for someone under the age of 10 to be non-verbal and at "kindergarten" level education.
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 3 months ago, 4 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,206
Anonymous H replied with this 3 months ago, 7 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,207
Wand, don' fails me now!
boof replied with this 3 months ago, 5 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,354,256
what, no voodoo jokes?