Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Meta joined in and replied with this 11 months ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,350,817
I tried to tell these ni🅱️🅱️as 11 years ago not to fuck with Russia and I tried to warn my fellow Americans not to get involved in an intra-Slavic conflict that's been going on for hundreds of years at this point and which we should have absolutely zero to do with.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 11 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,351,171
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
Starmer also handed Zelenskiy his latest cheque for 2.26 billion pounds and vowed to stand with Ukraine "for as long as it takes". These people are simply not serious and it's why Ukraine has been functionally destroyed.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 11 months ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,351,192
Thomas Jefferson: "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations—entangling alliances with none."
Everyone seems to have forgotten that the United States didn't just want independence from Britain, it wanted to rid itself of all the European wars Britain was involved in due to alliances and treaties.
Why the hell should Trump attack Putin / ally with Zelensky when he has said from day one he wants the war to end, and that it should never have started in the first place? Why shouldn't he try negotiate a peace deal, as he said he would all along?
Anonymous D replied with this 11 months ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,351,367
i unironically wouldnt mind that happening, i mean zelensky was pretty much cooked before his autistic screeching, and was probably even cooked years ago, but that would guarantee that zelensky gets burnt far beyond trumps questionable steak preferences, and that would be extremely amusing to watch.
> Thomas Jefferson: "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations—entangling alliances with none."
That made sense when Britain was the hegemon, but in a post-WW2 context it would mean being a fairweather friend to Europe and letting the Soviets (and today the Chinese) dominate the world. "Entangling alliances" are really about convincing others that they can count on your help when they need it. I don't deny that they can also escalate foreign wars, but I don't think it's really possible to avoid those sorts of alliances while also contesting hegemony.