Topic: Zelensky should have punched Trump in the face
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 months ago #124,117
Trump is a Russian asset.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 52 seconds later[^] [v] #1,350,750
Trump is a traitor
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 29 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,751
Trump is such a piece of shit
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,781
zelebooty got that main character syndrome bad
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,791
Anonymous D replied with this 3 months ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,792
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,795
Meta joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,817
I tried to tell these ni🅱️🅱️as 11 years ago not to fuck with Russia and I tried to warn my fellow Americans not to get involved in an intra-Slavic conflict that's been going on for hundreds of years at this point and which we should have absolutely zero to do with.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,845
@OPedo
You just wish your felon daddy can extract wealth from the corrupt Ukrainian government
@1,350,751 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Trump is such a piece of shit
Much like yourself
You just wish your felon daddy can extract wealth from the corrupt Ukrainian government
@1,350,751 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Trump is such a piece of shit
Much like yourself
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,848
Anonymous F replied with this 3 months ago, 34 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,857
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,859
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,860
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,862
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,874
He is the trash
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,901
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,934
Green !!bO/s3MBcD joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 6 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,958
Then the secret service would've made him regret that and Ukraine would get nothing.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 months ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,959
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,961
@1,350,958 (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
> Then the secret service would've made him regret that and Ukraine would get nothing.
Ukraine's already getting nothing so Action Man should have just cut his losses and taken a swing at Vance live on air.
> Then the secret service would've made him regret that and Ukraine would get nothing.
Ukraine's already getting nothing so Action Man should have just cut his losses and taken a swing at Vance live on air.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 29 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,350,962
Green !!bO/s3MBcD replied with this 3 months ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,168
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,171
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
Starmer also handed Zelenskiy his latest cheque for 2.26 billion pounds and vowed to stand with Ukraine "for as long as it takes". These people are simply not serious and it's why Ukraine has been functionally destroyed.
Starmer also handed Zelenskiy his latest cheque for 2.26 billion pounds and vowed to stand with Ukraine "for as long as it takes". These people are simply not serious and it's why Ukraine has been functionally destroyed.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,172
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 3 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,176
@previous (N)
Because it will mean the West has lost, which in turn will signal the end of Western hegemony.
Because it will mean the West has lost, which in turn will signal the end of Western hegemony.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,185
Vance is a fucking headache.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,192
Thomas Jefferson: "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations—entangling alliances with none."
Everyone seems to have forgotten that the United States didn't just want independence from Britain, it wanted to rid itself of all the European wars Britain was involved in due to alliances and treaties.
Why the hell should Trump attack Putin / ally with Zelensky when he has said from day one he wants the war to end, and that it should never have started in the first place? Why shouldn't he try negotiate a peace deal, as he said he would all along?
Everyone seems to have forgotten that the United States didn't just want independence from Britain, it wanted to rid itself of all the European wars Britain was involved in due to alliances and treaties.
Why the hell should Trump attack Putin / ally with Zelensky when he has said from day one he wants the war to end, and that it should never have started in the first place? Why shouldn't he try negotiate a peace deal, as he said he would all along?
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,193
Anonymous B replied with this 3 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,194
@previous (Q)
In their mind, something like a Nazi Europe is not their concern, it's in Europe not america
In their mind, something like a Nazi Europe is not their concern, it's in Europe not america
Anonymous P replied with this 3 months ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,309
@previous (B)
Exactly. The other thing people have forgotten is that America only joined WW2 after Pearl Harbour was attacked.
Exactly. The other thing people have forgotten is that America only joined WW2 after Pearl Harbour was attacked.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 months ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,367
i unironically wouldnt mind that happening, i mean zelensky was pretty much cooked before his autistic screeching, and was probably even cooked years ago, but that would guarantee that zelensky gets burnt far beyond trumps questionable steak preferences, and that would be extremely amusing to watch.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 3 days later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,930
@1,350,961 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 59 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,934
@1,351,192 (P)
> Thomas Jefferson: "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations—entangling alliances with none."
That made sense when Britain was the hegemon, but in a post-WW2 context it would mean being a fairweather friend to Europe and letting the Soviets (and today the Chinese) dominate the world. "Entangling alliances" are really about convincing others that they can count on your help when they need it. I don't deny that they can also escalate foreign wars, but I don't think it's really possible to avoid those sorts of alliances while also contesting hegemony.
> Thomas Jefferson: "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations—entangling alliances with none."
That made sense when Britain was the hegemon, but in a post-WW2 context it would mean being a fairweather friend to Europe and letting the Soviets (and today the Chinese) dominate the world. "Entangling alliances" are really about convincing others that they can count on your help when they need it. I don't deny that they can also escalate foreign wars, but I don't think it's really possible to avoid those sorts of alliances while also contesting hegemony.