Minichan

Topic: Two questions for Kook

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #123,696

Catholics firmly believe in the concept of transubstantiation: this is the phenomenon whereby upon saying the words "this is my body" a piece of bread immediately becomes the actual body of Christ, and a cup of wine turns into the actual blood of Christ simply when it is declared so, with the words, "this is my blood".

My first question is, do you think this is complete and utter unbelievable nonsense, and if so, why?

Next, transgender people firmly believe that despite their genetics, if a man simply says "I am a woman", he immediately ceases being a man and becomes an actual woman. And similarly, a woman is actually a man just by declaring it so.

My second question is, do you think this complete and utter nonsense, and if not, why not?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later[^] [v] #1,347,019

Im ignoring the first part

Not all transgender people believe that and I wouldn't say even most do

A large percentage of trans people are truscum or transmeds

Feel free to look up what those terms mean

(Edited 13 seconds later.)

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,029

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Why did you ignore the first part?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,032

@previous (C)
Because it isn't relevant to me in the slightest

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,033

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> this is the phenomenon whereby upon saying the words "this is my body" a piece of bread immediately becomes the actual body of Christ, and a cup of wine turns into the actual blood of Christ
That is high powered oral satisfaction.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,034

@previous (C)
It's gruesome. A lot of religious things are gruesome

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 44 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,036

@1,347,019 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> A large percentage of trans people are truscum or transmeds
Call it what you like, it involves the belief that you can make a thing true and real simply by declaring that it is.

> Im ignoring the first part
I am genuinely interested in your reasoning as to why the one thing is gruesome/irrational/unbelievable but the other is not. Both involve strikingly similar patterns of belief when you boil them down.

I agree that the cannibalism in Catholicism is gruesome. The Greek word used for "eat" in this context is actually best translated as "gnaw" as in on a piece of meat.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,037

@previous (A)
You haven't looked up those terms and so the conversation cannot continue

It's gruesome because of the cannibalism, so no, they aren't the same

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,043

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You haven't looked up those terms and so the conversation cannot continue

You never ever criticize La Catalina, yet you turn shrew at OP.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,046

Biology and gender are on a spectrum, and gender is a social construct. Your comparison is not valid. One is based on science, and the other, on faith.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,048

@1,347,043 (C)
Weird thing to type

I've criticized Catherine very harshly

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,050

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I've criticized Catherine very harshly

Show me an example.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,055

@previous (C)
My god. You want me to comb through 10 years of posts?

Get a life

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,056

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I am sure the task would be difficult.
Can you think of examples where you disagreed with him.

boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,057

religions develop habits of mind, what Dawkins referred to as memes, the term deliberately evocative of the word gene. couple that with habits of action, that is, rituals. these habits persist or don't, and by analogy to biological evolution, may change or not, according to adaptive value. people tend to adapt or not, persist or not, and we get what we get, doing what we can to deal with what we got

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,058

@1,347,019 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

Truscum is the only rational philosophy.

Anon replied with this 1 year ago, 15 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,059

@1,347,057 (boof)
Do you practice cannibalism?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 38 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,062

@1,347,056 (C)
Find nearly any post she's made and I've said something in disagreement

We used to fight horribly

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 15 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,063

@1,347,058 (F)
I agree

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 58 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,064

@1,347,059 (Anon)
not yet

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,066

@1,347,056 (C)
*her

Anon replied with this 1 year ago, 39 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,067

@1,347,064 (boof)
I have tried it a couple of times. The bread in Catholic churches is a super thin cracker and the wine is 98% water.
In Greek Churches they serve real chunks of very tasty Greek bread. Even offer chunks on the way out. Wine is not watered down.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 second later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,068

@1,347,066 (D)
him

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,070

@previous (G)
Absolutely. At best a HeShe.

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 44 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,072

@1,347,067 (Anon)
the bread is suppose to be unleavened

Anonymous D double-posted this 1 year ago, 15 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,073

@1,347,068 (G)
*her

Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 11 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,074

@1,347,070 (C)
Not even a heshe... He is, and always will be, a male, just like kook

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,076

@1,347,067 (Anon)
I like to joke that some boys got into trouble by breaking into the tabernacle and "eating all the Jesus"

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,077

@1,347,072 (D)
Good point. Odd how Catholic Church does not use Matzo.
No way could the Greeks make such bread unleavened.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 50 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,079

@1,347,074 (G)
Creep

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,081

@1,347,037 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You haven't looked up those terms and so the conversation cannot continue
Already knew what transmeds meant. Truscum I believe is considered derogatory for somebody who believes in gender dysphoria... and is irrelevant to my question.

I'm the one asking the question by the way, and I've chosen the words quite deliberately. The key part of each main word is "trans" which is latin for "across" / "over"... it implies the belief that something can change over into another thing. I know it's quite difficult for you, but please do try to understand the question I'm asking and give an answer to that question, instead of inventing your own question and answering that instead.

> It's gruesome because of the cannibalism, so no, they aren't the same
My question did not focus on the cannibalism part, it focused on the part (once again) where something can change over, physically, into something else. In that regard, transubstantiation is related to transgenderism.

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,085

it would seem that some people have a peculiar mismatch of selves, which is difficult to comprehend for us who barely think about it

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,086

@1,347,081 (A)
Idiot

Trans people don't believe you just say you're a gender and you are

Many are transmeds

Learn to communicate properly

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,087

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Trans people don't believe you just say you're a gender and you are
Same for the Furries who wake up one day and think they are a Dog or Fox and they instantly become such.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,088

@1,347,086 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Idiot
Ad hominem - ignored.

> Trans people don't believe you just say you're a gender and you are
Oh but they do. They also get very angry and upset, especially men who think they are women, when you tell them they're being irrational or that they are physically still male.

> Many are transmeds
Yes, i.e. they believe they can physically change their gender through medication and/or surgical procedures... the same sort of mental gymnastics is required to believe this.

> Learn to communicate properly
Learn to read and comprehend, instead of skimming over and leaping to wrong conclusions. You come across as quite badly educated and you are not half as smart as you think you are. You are also extremely rude and arrogant.

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,089

@previous (A)
It isn't the same. Sorry

And I love being rude and arrogant towards you. It's what you deserve

(Edited 26 seconds later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,092

@1,347,046 (D)
trannies exist solely on faith, and eventually that sustaining faith will run out, and they will join the fellowship of the 41.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,093

@1,347,089 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Sorry you feel that way. Going to have to conclude that you won't answer my question either because you can't comprehend it or because you don't have any rational answers.

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,095

@1,347,092 (H)
No, it is based on biology and sociology

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,098

@OP

> Catholics firmly believe in the concept of transubstantiation: this is the phenomenon whereby upon saying the words "this is my body" a piece of bread immediately becomes the actual body of Christ, and a cup of wine turns into the actual blood of Christ simply when it is declared so, with the words, "this is my blood".

To be clear the bread and wine only become the body and blood of Christ when the Eucharistic offering is performed by we priests, or a bishop. It wouldn't work if a layperson were to attempt it. You'd still just be eating plain old bread and drinking plain old wine.

Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,103

@1,347,095 (D)
*cope and grift

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,112

@1,347,098 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
You are not a priest.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,118

@previous (D)
He says he is. Of course he says a lot of things that turn out to be lies. So he has the prime qualification to be a Priest.

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,120

@1,347,112 (D)

> You are not a priest.

Yes I am. I can prove it.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,347,151

@1,347,093 (A)
I did answer. Thanks
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.