Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 50 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,346,765
@1,346,748 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Yes! One of them was. Luke Farritor, along with two other guys (who AFAIK aren't involved in the DOGE stuff), developed a method to virtually unravel burnt Roman scrolls found in Herculaneum.
Erik !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,346,767
@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
Do you think one of the reasons for them being smeered is because they'll understand government documents more then the previous people in charge?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 34 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,346,812
@1,346,773 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
I mean these kids have no substantial experience doing accounting or auditing of any kind, especially not government accounting, so letting them run wild across the US government seems ill-advised.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,346,817
@previous (B)
If we have career professionals doing the work then we do not need 21 year olds there learning what double entry bookkeeping is for the first time.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,346,822
@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Any corruption that isn't accompanied by an email that says FW:Re:Re:Bribe Payments to Zambia will likely be missed by these people so I am less sanguine on them finding anything of import.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 1 year ago, 31 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,346,838
@1,346,812 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You would think this is common sense, but in today's world, this is actually quite a controversial opinion. Should we let inexperienced amateurs lose on important government systems, because their boss is friends with the President? Well, it's really debatable!