Minichan

Topic: Trump is going to make computer games great again.

Erik !saAqdaazn2 started this discussion 1 year ago #123,631

Lefties mad. No more pronounes and no more trans scars in the character creation section.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 54 seconds later[^] [v] #1,346,400

The great invisible hand of the market is doing that, not Trump.

Erik !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 11 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,405

@previous (B)

> The great invisible hand of the market is doing that, not Trump.

Trump has given people the strength to make it happen.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,406

Nothing says "not a fascist dictator" more than trying to control the arts.

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 27 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,412

I don't play computer games but my hot take on this issue is that the only thing dumber than having "trans scars in the character creation section" of a game is not being allowed to have them.

boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,436

how about that woke Pac-Man game, Ms. Pac-Man

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,459

@1,346,406 (C)
thats basically what the cianiggers did to the arts to twist them into todays propaganda mill, trumps just helping the arts heal.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,486

@previous (F)
You can create any art you want legally (with some extreme exceptions like snuff films, etc.). Trump wants to actually legally control the arts. That is totally different.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,487

@previous (C)
lol

Green !!bO/s3MBcD joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 35 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,496

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,512

He/him and she/her are pronouns you dickweed

Dead !Pool..v42s double-posted this 1 year ago, 31 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,513

If you want to get rid of pronouns, you're unironically a gender abolitionist.

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,524

Erik !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,526

USAID was supporting gamergate and they have been fou d out.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,527

@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Link to a reliable source?

Erik !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,528

@previous (C)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0neM4fxEhDA

Meta joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,529

@1,346,512 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
I think he meant selection of pronouns separately from sex.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,530

@1,346,528 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
I said "reliable" source, not some YouTube video.

Erik !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,534

@previous (C)
Did you even watch it?

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,536

@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Yes, and it's not a reliable source. I am asking for a link to something like Reuters, BBC, AP, etc. I am, not saying you are wrong, but just asking for a reliable source.

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

Erik !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,539

@previous (C)
So you only want bias sources that recieved USAID? LOL

Erik !saAqdaazn2 (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 51 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,540

@1,346,536 (C)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2025/02/05/bbc-media-action-charity-received-usaid-funding/

Bbc recieved usaid

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 26 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,545

@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Ok. what did they receive it for, exactly? Was it for subscriptions, which the government pays for for many new channels?

Erik !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 45 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,551

@previous (C)
Politico was paid by usaid to smeer gamergate

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 59 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,553

@1,346,536 (C)
> asks for reliable source
> gives unserious fraud rags as examples
lol
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.