Topic: Definitely not a fascist dictator
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #123,615
Fascist dictators absolutely do not do things like this. Nope.(Edited 41 seconds later.)
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #1,346,299
perhaps it will be renamed the Nixon Center
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 18 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,469
If this is what a dictator does, what do you call it when the president ignores legal methods for amending the constitution and just declares unilaterally that he's decided to change it?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,502
@previous (C)
taking advantage of the abuses of the law that the previous fuckstick made for himself, as is traditional for republicans.
is there truely a "good" and "evil" in politics, or are they both on the same side? lol.
taking advantage of the abuses of the law that the previous fuckstick made for himself, as is traditional for republicans.
is there truely a "good" and "evil" in politics, or are they both on the same side? lol.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,679
@previous (D)
It was Biden that tried to simply dictate a change to the constitution.
Trump has never tried that.
It was Biden that tried to simply dictate a change to the constitution.
Trump has never tried that.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,690
@previous (C)
If Biden did that, then he was wrong, too. Now, back to the fact that fascist dictators always control and censor art and literature.
If Biden did that, then he was wrong, too. Now, back to the fact that fascist dictators always control and censor art and literature.
Meta joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,691
Why is he messing around with stuff like running the Kennedy Center? Wouldn't a fascist dictator be rounding up opposition politicians or deporting millions of immigrants or something?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,692
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,693
@previous (A)
But where's the actual fascist stuff? Why aren't the heads of the DNC popping up at GITMO and CIA black sites?
But where's the actual fascist stuff? Why aren't the heads of the DNC popping up at GITMO and CIA black sites?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 36 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,694
@previous (Meta)
He is doing things that fascist dictators do. It will increase and get worse and worse.
He is doing things that fascist dictators do. It will increase and get worse and worse.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,696
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,697
@previous (Meta)
He wanted to be, but sane people stopped him. This time around, they're all loyalists.
He wanted to be, but sane people stopped him. This time around, they're all loyalists.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,698
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,699
@previous (Meta)
Again, he wanted to. He tear-gassed protestors to hold a Bible upside down at a church. He said he wanted to shoot Mexicans coming over the border. When told he could not, he asked if they could just shoot them in the legs. He fomented an attack on the Capitol based on lies. Many other such things.
Again, he wanted to. He tear-gassed protestors to hold a Bible upside down at a church. He said he wanted to shoot Mexicans coming over the border. When told he could not, he asked if they could just shoot them in the legs. He fomented an attack on the Capitol based on lies. Many other such things.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,700
@previous (A)
Are you a Christian? I'm just trying to figure out why the bible thing upset you so much.
Are you a Christian? I'm just trying to figure out why the bible thing upset you so much.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,701
@previous (Meta)
It's not the Bible itself. It's the performative hypocrisy of teargassing peaceful protestors then pretending to be a Christian.
It's not the Bible itself. It's the performative hypocrisy of teargassing peaceful protestors then pretending to be a Christian.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,702
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,704
@previous (Meta)
Yes, if they do it legally, which they were. They had a permit and were peacefully protesting. He had them gassed. Stop defending this shit.
Yes, if they do it legally, which they were. They had a permit and were peacefully protesting. He had them gassed. Stop defending this shit.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,717
@previous (A)On June 1, 2020, amid the George Floyd protests in Washington, D.C., law enforcement officers used tear gas and other riot control tactics to forcefully clear peaceful protesters from Lafayette Square, creating a path for President Donald Trump and senior administration officials to walk from the White House to St. John's Episcopal Church.[1][2][3] Trump held a Bible and posed for a photo op in front of Ashburton House (the church's parish house), which had been defaced by graffiti and damaged by a fire set during protests the night before.
They were so peaceful... they burned down a church parish house and covered it with graffiti? That doesn't sound very peaceful. Or are you operating under the CNN definition of "peaceful protest"?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,718
@1,346,704 (A)
If the protesters were Republicans and were gassed so Biden could get through, the first thing you would do is compliment Biden, then say the Republicans should not have been there.
If the protesters were Republicans and were gassed so Biden could get through, the first thing you would do is compliment Biden, then say the Republicans should not have been there.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,719
@1,346,717 (Meta)
Not the same protestors. "peaceful protestors" is what it says
@previous (F)
Hell no I wouldn't.
Not the same protestors. "peaceful protestors" is what it says
@previous (F)
Hell no I wouldn't.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 11 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,798
@1,346,679 (C)
> It was Biden that tried to simply dictate a change to the constitution.
>
> Trump has never tried that.
Trump says no more Birthright which is in the 14th Amendment.
>
> It was Biden that tried to simply dictate a change to the constitution.
>
> Trump has never tried that.
Trump says no more Birthright which is in the 14th Amendment.
>
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 28 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,810
@1,346,717 (Meta)
It is always amusing to me that conservatives deliberately misunderstand the two halves of the sentence that reporter spoke, along the lines of "peaceful protest in the day were followed by riots at night."
Don't let the facts get in the way of a good narrative.
It is always amusing to me that conservatives deliberately misunderstand the two halves of the sentence that reporter spoke, along the lines of "peaceful protest in the day were followed by riots at night."
Don't let the facts get in the way of a good narrative.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 10 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,953
@1,346,798 (G)
For decades after the 14th amendment was ratified, that was not the case.
The original interpretation was that it wasn't enough to just be born here.
For decades after the 14th amendment was ratified, that was not the case.
The original interpretation was that it wasn't enough to just be born here.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 58 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,956
@1,346,810 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
where fax? all op has done is be retard.
where fax? all op has done is be retard.
(Edited 26 seconds later.)